“BTW, I realize I’ve been terribly remiss, given my belief that slavery is abhorent and that consent is dubious when expressed by the BDSM crowd, in announcing that I am refusing to continue talking to a sub/slave, and yet continuing to debate a domme/owner, as if a domme owner is free, and her sub isn’t free, and a free person in a free society can talk to an owner as if they are inhabiting some kind of free sphere still. How terrible of me! That was just due to pure thoughtessness on my part. That’s going to end right now. Good-bye Maria. ”

I think i hit a nerve here.
Roughly Translated, Dyer can no longer offer any Valid debate on his position so he shall cease to debate all together.

Mistress Maria LaVeaux Bows and sheaths her Rapier keen wit as her opponent concedes defeat and retreats to lick his wounds.

My toy, There was never any hope of Dyerbrook answering your questions. Not because he felt himself above you (Though he will tell that to himself in a Vain attempt to preserve his own ego) but because your questions cut to the very Marrow of his arguements and he indeed had no answers. Faced with the Hypocracy of this paper thin Veneer of superiority, Dyer chooses not to continue debate, but rather, to turn tail and run.

A final (I hope) word for the very estimable Mr. Dyerbrook; I DID warn you chere, as follows.

“Chere,, I would have thought you had had enough humiliation from the last thread, why don’t you take your Moral Majority of One, and find a more surmountable “Sin” you are just not intellectually up to this one.”

You should have Listened from the start and saved yourself the Embarassment of crawling from the fields with your empty and unconvincing cries of “I am Too Good to continue arguing with you”
I don’t buy it and neither i think does anyone else.

Your worthy Opponent.
Maria LaVeaux

flara kajira toy

But again, We have seen Dyer has a problem at times with simple linear thinking and therefore, this bit of logic may be lost on him.

Maria.

You have asked for private correspondence between members of our community and EA. The answer is simple… No.

Now go choke on it.

And frankly, I am not interested in your opinion about it.

Oh I know.. I’ll save you the trouble of your witty and intellectual response… “Lady J is an ass.” There, I have done your job for you. Now you don’t need the information.

BTW, I realize I’ve been terribly remiss, given my belief that slavery is abhorent and that consent is dubious when expressed by the BDSM crowd, in announcing that I am refusing to continue talking to a sub/slave, and yet continuing to debate a domme/owner, as if a domme owner is free, and her sub isn’t free, and a free person in a free society can talk to an owner as if they are inhabiting some kind of free sphere still. How terrible of me! That was just due to pure thoughtessness on my part. That’s going to end right now. Good-bye Maria. I do not condone slavery in any form.

toy

~kettle looking over at black pot and smirking~

in any case the critical letter, Dyerbrook, is the one noted and quoted in the lead article above. There are others as well, perhaps others would be willing to share them .. i will not share them because they were not communications with me.

kelli