Comments on: Virtual Child Porn in Second Life

By: les

les — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:38:51 +0000

I THINK ITS GREAT.

WHERE CAN I GET IT?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:25:18 +0000

This topic and the comments amuse me. I’m sorry, but they just do xD

By: Sasami

Sasami — Sun, 13 Apr 2008 08:28:43 +0000

Why are you guys saying that my porn is illigal??? Its super horny so fuck off and make your own porn, then we’ll see if thats illigal.

By: a

Sun, 02 Mar 2008 21:37:10 +0000

wow go gizz on your self DANG

By: mrmr

mrmr — Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:12:28 +0000

Nothing technically illegal here if all participants are of age. Its just weird…. i feel like its neither here nor there. Sex in 3d world is just a weird thing. at most, I just wanna go to a 3d porn shop and buy some 2d movies….and watch it offline….sex involves…flesh and the closest thing to this would be shared video so you can SEE the flesh of the other person. Avatars…as they stand now…are cartoon characters. Perhaps if avatars ARE you (some sort of live video of you placed into a shared vr environment ) then… I can see your flesh and your movement.

but cartoon characters?

By: Vincent F.

Vincent F. — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:07:45 +0000

Sasami has clearly broken copyright laws and should be punished to the full extent of the law. Regardless of him/her acting out “child pornography fantasies”.

By: Chris

Chris — Sat, 29 Sep 2007 09:50:57 +0000

Even if the pavatar is 708 yrs old I think this crap shouldn’t be allowed. I’m digusted to hear all these news of perverted child porn. I looked up in google for virtual child, to play a game of nursery or of taking care of a virtual child. But no, all I see are these child porn cases which should obviosly be in one decision. Eliminate all child porn and anything related to it. 708 yr old avatar is technically legal, but it shouldn’t be alowed.

By: rocky

rocky — Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:03:22 +0000

ok according to us law the onlything thta you can get in trouble for with someting like this is if you are found to have porn of real lifee kids on your hard drive or in your home then this only adds to the sentence but by itself the us government doesnt care about virtual or fantasy characters engaging in sexual acts

By: Summja

Summja — Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:15:12 +0000

I agree with many of the people who have already posted. You are unprofessional, mentioning a specific person was unnecessary. You could have just mentioned that people were using what YOU felt was child pornography and mentioned that the issue needs to be addressed.

Furthermore as an outsider to this game and this fourm I must say when I first read you article I honestly thought you were a 12 year old who was just trash talking, because any respecting journalist would not be so bluntly biased. Your job is to be objective.

Also, please remember that Second Life is a game. Would you consider a 25 year old who looks young child pornography? No. This is very similar. His/her character is an adult who looks young.

Finally, I suggest “Sasami” and anyone else who may be targeted in the future should not take this article (or any article by this journalist) seriously because he/she is just an amature who is unprofessional and obviously very immature.

By: Alex

Alex — Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:01:00 +0000

This is completely legal, does not create a problem… and keeps pedos from harassing real children.
This is perfectly fine, let’s continue having it exist in the world.