The only person buried here is you: You made a comment that – even at face value – mistakenly paints everyone in a demographic as something you yourself hate. when someone comes in to challenge your viewpoint and points out to you the irony of using your current nickname while making this comment, you make an attempt to blow it off by citing useless facts.

Now here are the facts for you, and please – don’t bother responding (even though I know you will):

1.) You were called out on your own lack of understanding, in particular the irony of signing your comments as ‘King” Frederick. You then attempted to combat this (which really goes to show: you apparently know nothing at all about how such things are seen) by citing useless facts about an era that does not even enter into the original comment calling you out on your own nickname. (In short Freddy boy, you held up a flimsy excuse).

2.) You attempt to liken this practice you loathe so much to other things which have no bearing whatsoever on the subject matter. Nice try though – next time stick to the matter at hand.

3.) when faced with (possibly) mistaken data you jump all over it as if it was the crowning and shining verification you needed to give your argument the boost it needed. doesn’t work that way Freddy boy.

4.) when I said that all I want at this point was for you to admit you made a mistake …. you continued in a fashion true to those that haven’t a bloody clue.

5.) My most recent comment was, as per usual when dealing with your ilk, scanned for anything you could jump on and (attempt) to use to your advantage. did I say anything about being a furry? Nope – not a word. I intentionally used that example because I have noticed that furries are another of your little pet peeves.

Now, since you’re incapable of being civilized and not resorting to labeling based on the most circumstantial of items, or your own personal thoughts – as said before, I’m done with you.

I really do hope you run into the wrong person to pull these stunts with in real life Freddy boy – if only to show you that people like you invariably end off getting their head handed to them.

Lawl.

Okay, you haven’t “abandoned” them, you’ve simply stopped asserting them in the face of a mild rebuttal.

“I really don’t give a damn what the article contained,”

Then STFU because I’m commenting on the article.

“one that makes an assumption about an entire demographic ”

Only if you read shit into it.

“Yes, there was a classified out – about a month or so ago actually, it’s not there anymore and as I already said – or perhaps you missed it? – I may have you confused with”

In otherwords, you’re a dizzy ditz who doesn’t know here from there.

“modern ‘Kings’ do not enter into the equation – these days most of them are little more that a mouthpiece or a figurehead”

Yes, that’s nice, and how do you know that my “character” isn’t just one of these? Or a King from a purely fantasy world? You don’t. You just made a shitty argument. You assume that because I use the term “king” that my “character” (lol) must be imitating some specific European king in a wooden-literal fashion.

You made a laughably idiotic point, deal with it.

“Nope, the era of Kings was the Medieval Ages”

Yes, because there were no kings in other parts of the world like Europe, there were no kings in the bronze age, there were no kings in Asia, etc. And there certainly isn’t a rich literary tradition of fictional kings ruling over fictional realms, boy howdy.

“ou refuse to admit you made a mistake: fine”

Irony explosion

“You’re not worth my time or energy anymore”

It’s painfully obvious that you’re just covering your ass here to preserve your e-honor. Rest assured that I won’t even remember having this conversation a week from now, nor will I recognize your moniker. However, your embarrassment remains here as a monument to your inability to ‘defend’ the people you’re ‘defending,’ mighty black knight of the pedophile round table.

“this post alone shows you knowingly mistook said demographic”

No, that post qualifies my statement to show that I know that there are some people who just weirdly like to pretend their babies with no interest in having sex. And that post refutes your point that I am “slandering an entire group of people” rather than one specific section of people, pedophile ageplayers.

Please, continue to bury yourself.

“commonly seen as sex crazed players of Animals – when in reality that is a small segment of the group ”

Lawl. You got buffetted by Second Life Safari didn’t you? Don’t worry, we’re done with your ageplaying, diaper-wearing, dog penis-wearing section of the community … for now.

Just tell your buddies to keep their groups sectioned off by banlines… Civilization doesn’t want to lose its lunch by accidentally seeing their activities.

Have a Merry Christmas. Try not to copulate with something that can’t consent, okay?

“Yes, for the record, though I’m using the term “ageplayer” I’m not referring to people who just like to play in child avatars, I’m talking about people who get off on child avatars having sex — aka child pornography.”

Pedophilia is pedophilia, not Age Play, despite what some may think. Like other types of role Play, there are extremes and differing groups within the group, take for example (often the most misunderstood) Furries. commonly seen as sex crazed players of Animals – when in reality that is a small segment of the group – and scorned by the vast majority, in fact some go so far as to say that that segment isn’t even a part of the group, all thanks to the negative spin the media and others put on it.

Call a spade a spade Freddy boy, not a shovel (or in this case, digging implement).

I haven’t ‘abandoned’ anything at all – I’ve made my points and frankly anyone reading this is only going to have two opposing person’s words to contrast.

I read the article – it’s just another one of those “ask (insert name here) pieces of trash that are in every publication.

frankly I really don’t give a damn what the article contained, that’s really not what I’m here about Freddy boy, I’m here due to your initial comment – one that makes an assumption about an entire demographic by it just being here.

Yes, there was a classified out – about a month or so ago actually, it’s not there anymore and as I already said – or perhaps you missed it? – I may have you confused with another pretentious SL user that refers to himself as a King.

As for the rest? Sorry Freddy boy but modern ‘Kings’ do not enter into the equation – these days most of them are little more that a mouthpiece or a figurehead – no power, no bearing on anything at all. Nope, the era of Kings was the Medieval Ages.

You have attempted to use arguments that have nothing at all to do with this issue, you refuse to admit you made a mistake: fine.

I’m done with you Freddy boy – on this one anyway: why? You’re not worth my time or energy anymore – or at least not the time or energy it would take to get you to admit to posting a comment you (probably did not) know would be taken in a context other than what you had intended – something I myself have done on occasion, and quite frankly I don’t hesitate to admit when something has been taken out of context.

—
“”Amazing how you are a “holy roller” if you find pornographic images depicting children being raped disgusting.”

which, when put into context with everything else that follows, shows you associate Age Play with child Pornography,”"
—

Did you not read the article?

ARTICLE: ““They ask things like ‘What if one of you was a real kid?’ but that’s stupid. I’ve seen underage kids sneaking on the grid”

If no sexual pederasty/pedophilia is involved, then why does it matter if the other avatar is a real kid or not? That’s what I was commenting on, sport.

I was commenting on the article and the person invovled in the article who admittedly engages in child pornography using second life avatars.

You swagger in and make a justification for child/pederast pornography using historical merit — but you’re not defending child pornography, right?

Now you’re backpedaling at the speed of light. I notice you dropped your fanficul accusation that I own a “castle” somewhere.

“”….. attempting to change what you have said, attempting to put words where there are none”"

Here’s a recap of all the points you abandoned, much of it through backpedaling:

1. You made a shitty argument from history, I rebut it, you drop it entirely.

2. You say that because I use the title “King” that I have to give credence to pedophilia because in some cultures in some times kings reigned over civilizations where pedophilia was present. I point out that kings have ruled over civilizations with slavery, racism, jingoism, cannibalism, etc. And you drops this point entirely.

3. You make the claim that I have a castle build — not only that, but I have a classified out! Where is this castle build? Where is this classified? And why would should this mean anything even if it wasn’t just the blathering imagination of a pedophile apologist? Who knows! You drop this point entirely

4. Now you are saying that I am in the wrong because I assosciated ageplay with child pornography, when this article is about _child pornography in ageplay_. Can you just drop this one too and spare yourself further eMbarrassment?

Oh, here, I’ll write your rebuttal: You are like prokofy and you are TRYING to sound smart, but you are not, you are dumb, so there!

Do yourself a favor – stop posting. Here is your first comment to this article:

“Amazing how you are a “holy roller” if you find pornographic images depicting children being raped disgusting.”

which, when put into context with everything else that follows, shows you associate Age Play with child Pornography, just as the rather deluded author of this article, and the person writing to said author, has done.

with that said, kindly get over yourself: You’ve done nothing more than rate yourself up with Prok ….. attempting to change what you have said, attempting to put words where there are none, and labeling others based on your own deluded notion of what is being said.

So sorry to have to point out to you what you (probably unknowingly) opened yourself up to.

Now if you’re done attempting to be intelligent, I do have a few things to do – so kindly admit that your initial comment was aimed at Age Players (as the title of this article suggests) or admit that you made a mistake in not making it clear from the onset.

I was, since it was her original post that sparked a long angry debate. Hence the word “age-player” was mentioned, even in a fairly positive context and still managed to spark a long angry debate.

1. He makes a shitty argument from history, I rebut it, he drops it entirely.

2. He says that because I use the title “King” that I have to give credence to pedophilia because — get this — in some cultures in some times kings reigned over civilizations where pedophilia was present. I point out that kings have ruled over civilizations with slavery, racism, jingoism, cannibalism, etc. And he drops this point entirely.

3. He continues to make the claim that I have a castle build — not only that, but I have a classified out! Where is this castle build? Where is this classified? And why would should this mean anything even if it wasn’t just the blathering imagination of a pedophile apologist? Who knows! Welcome to “Just a thought” land, a roleplaying realm for people who live in fantasy dimensions where logical thought does not apply!

“You’re just proving more and more that you don’t even think before you post”

You post this without any sense of irony at all.

“I defend groups that are persecuted based on a mistaken vision perpetuated by little maggots like you”

Persecuted Groups = Pedophiles
“Maggots” = People who think child pornography is disgusting

Do you do this in public, “Just a thought”? Do your co-workers and family members know that you defend child pornographers on the Internet? Or are you only shining Sir-Lancelot of the Ageplay Table Online?

“you do have a Medieval Castle build – the design of the castle cannot be compared to anything modern at all, despite your having put up a classified”

You’re such a moron. Not only do I not have a castle, I don’t even own land to put it on! Pedophiles, despair, your apologist is a moron who can’t even do cursory research before making unfounded accusations. Oh what a friend we have in the ironically named “Just a thought”

“looking for some club DJ and having it teleport people to your little build”

Hahahahaha, so please, tell me where my land is? Tell me where this “castle” is and what my “build” is? The only place I hang out is in Baku, not in whatever drug-induced hallucinatory version of Second Life you’ve been playing.

“by all means keep responding to me”

It’s just too funny. You don’t have anything substantial. You claim shit that doesn’t exist (my mysterious magical castle where I host DJ-driven raves, apparently), you make bullshit, fallacious arguments using ‘history,’ you have shitty logic (“You’re a king, all kings reigned over pedophiles)… and yet you keep attacking *my* intelligence.

By all means, hammer away, you’re making the ageplay community look fantastic.

“he fact that you so blatantly lump people together like ”

like ‘Kings’?

“you’re too blind and too arrogant to admit that not everything is as you think it is”

Yeah, because ‘Child pornography is disgusting and wrong’ really amounts to ‘everything is as I think it is.’

Shouldn’t you be watching the wikipedia entry for “NAMBLA” to make sure no one switches ‘boy lover’ to ‘pedophile’?

“you’d not be foolish enough to think I’m defending pedophiles – I’m not, and my responses have nothing to do with that minor group of Age Players”

If you’re not defending pedophiles, Dummy, then why did you respond to my first post ATTACKING PEDOPHILES and not ageplayers in general?

Does it HURT to backpedal that fast? Are you burning off the holiday calories?

“Prove that you’re not some rednecked bigot ”

This is rich – you bitch about people ‘lumping everyone together’ and then you use the term ‘redneck,’ as if all ‘rednecks’ are bigots, and as if a strong distaste for child pornography means I must be caucasion.

“I’ll let this one go”

Oh, golly, no, black knight, armless and defenseless, please, keep on charging bravely into battle.