WTF! Lynch the rude pundit now!:

http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/

coco

The world I live in is one where such abrasive and abusive people have no place whatsoever, despite claims to the contrary. Why? They really don’t serve a purpose other than to be abrasive and abusive.

Had this been a discussion about say …. physical abuse aimed at another person (even doemstic abuse) I’d be the person clamouring for the abuser to be shot.

Death Penalty for Murder? sure – in fact if the case can be proven beyond all shadow of doubt, why off them right there in the courtroom!

rape? get rid of them. No jail time, no parole later ….

Theft? That deserves a second chance. After that, get off the mortal coil.

Getting the picture?

Now the sad part is that the way the world works, none of what I believe above would eevr be considered because Humanity latches on to the insane notion that these people can be reformed (and maybe some can) …. I don’t believe in giving them that chance.

Just as I believe those that write anything at all for public consumption should have no rights to be abrasive and abusive – ever. Freedom of speech stops when it causes strife.

I think you are trying to take on all the laws extant regarding slander, libel, and free speech, combined with various hate speech law, and interpreting them far too broadly.

coco

when it comes to that sort of thing I’m an “eye for an eye” type of person, in most situations. if you actually think people have a right to be abrasive then by all rights ….. go support the local racist groups. after all …. “abrasive” is being polite for them isn’t it?

coco

As for this paper? Unless I find something here written by one of the ‘reporters’ that breaches typePad’s Terms of service. … well to say that your post script doesn’t have thing one to do with any of my comments is putting it mildly.

An interesting thing to note: I may not agree with the concept of being politically correct …. but I don’t agree at all with the notion that an individual can go about spewing the sort of things I’ve seen in many of his/her posts and on his/her blog.

Nowhere did I see irrefutable proof to back up anything that he/she said. Nowhere at all.

what I did see were crass generalizations about people he/she has probably never met at all. What I got when I made attempts to respond in the Linden Blog to him/her was nothing but venom for daring to disagree. I got lumped in with a group I do not belong to and in essence told to sod off.

sorry, that doesn’t fly with me, nor does this business of refusing to admit that his/her comments can be construed as abrasive when they need not be, and purposly geared to cause a response that is less than calm. Nor does the business of hiding behind some deluded sense of “doing what is right and just.”

You certainly do disagree with a lot, that I’ve noticed. And I find it amusing that you tell me the way the world works.

coco

which incidentally I have reviewed ….. TypePad doesn’t believe in free speech at all, and could close down Prok’s blog based just on the (albeit veiled and occasionally artful) venom, bigotry, and unfoundedly baseless accusations contained there.

I’m a firm believer in proof for any sort of conspiracy theories …. until provided I don’t put much weight on them except as a view that needs to be kept to oneself or to one’s circle of friends. They don’t serve a purpose unless the proof is there.