Prok got his facts, sorry, fantasy, wrong – again?
I simply can’t believe it. CNET must be part of the grand conspiracy…

I just want to clear one thing up. In the article, Prokofy writes “CNET’s and YouTube’s facile and swift compliance with this order…”

But CNET never considered posting pictures or video of the attack. So we were never asked to take any photos down. We were asked for something else, and we refused. So I need to clear this up. CNET did not capitulate in any way to Anshe’s demands.

Thanks,
Daniel

THEN

you blow it to bits with a burst of abject madness like this;-

“The griefing of Anshe’s press conference isn’t “immature griefing by kids,” and to portray it that way and minimize it is part of the whole enabling culture. It’s actually part of a planned, concerted, deliberate, organized network of people continually, routinely commiting crime — DNS attacks, serious griefing with destruction of property and financial loss, and harassment and stalking. Your notion that this is “just a bunch of kids” and we’re supposed to now climb into some harness of false comparisons and moral equivalences is really over the top.”

Riiiiiiiiggghtttoooo….

Independent verification of what *I* read in Anshe’s profile all those years ago. Yes Prok – I was around then – which you clearly weren’t, or you’d know it wasn’t ‘hearsay’.

There again, maybe you DO know that, and it just suits you to pretend you don’t? (OMG! I think *I’ve* developed Prok’s Syndrome too! -looks around nervously, seeing conspiracy and personal attacks in every word and action- Arrrgh! They are ALL out to get ME!)

ROFLMAO!

I won’t bother dignifying the rest of your rubbish with a reply – but I do wish you could bring yourself to be content with your own private soap box, which I’d read, if I could stand it, if I could wade through the cloying verbiage of persecution complexes, conspiracy theories and personal vendettas it’s filled with…

Sadly your overwhelming craving is for attention and downright vindictive argument – even to the extent of arguing with those who on occasion agree with you and *some* of your views.

Why anyone seeking to run an online news and current affairs organ would even contemplate allowing you access, let alone posting privileges, is beyond me. Still, that decision is, fortunately for you and your fans, in other hands.

As for China, this could very well be a possibility. She lives in Germany and is based there, but she did incorporate a company in China, and I believe that her husband currently lives there to oversee operations while she remains in Germany for the time being. It doesn’t seem implausible that the antics of penispenispenis might worry her in the overly moral land of the red dragon.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/3e21a6ca-7a37-11db-8838-0000779e2340.html

Published late November.

“”"”The flesh-and-blood person who created and controls this “avatar”, or visual persona, is Ailin Gräf, a Chinese-born teacher who lives in a quiet suburb of Frankfurt.”"”"

So she doesn’t live there, hasn’t moved there and isn’t subject to Chinese traditional laws, regulations and expectations to be ‘an upstanding citizen of China’.

Point is moot, unless you’d like to argue about the Chinese attempting to nationally censor the internet in a general arena. China can’t govern over people who don’t live there, in acts that weren’t originated there….

Uh, yeah. It reminds me of you. You had no persona or identity, until you were able to come on here and attack me and Anshe and other public figures : )

Now you’re whining and whinging over being abruptly smacked back *shrugs*.

If think to point a finger at me, I fear not. I think it’s hugely important to keep criticizing even those who agree with you. I really should have more company in doing this important work.