Comments on: YouTube Bans Another Second Life Safari Vid. Sort of.

By: humanoid

humanoid — Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:01:38 +0000

“We do not want a few rotten apples tarnishing the 16 months of hard work we’ve put in to build up the Barbie Club.”

Yeah. I wouldn’t want the reputation of a place dedicated to dudes whacking it to low-poly 3D models to have it’s reputation damaged.

By: Bedevere Octagon

Bedevere Octagon — Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:30:01 +0000

Petey! You pissed of the almighty power of the internet(s)!

Nice Job!

And Stacy lets be real, this is free advertising for you. I am sure much worse things go on there.

By: Petey

Petey — Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:35:52 +0000

AHAHAHAHAHAHA

But goddammit the Internet police succeeded and the video is down again. Time to go create another YouTube account.

By: Stacey Sugar

Stacey Sugar — Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:58:45 +0000

I have just looked at this video. I was not aware this film contained scenes shot at Barbie Club until today. The owners of the club did not authorise the use of the premises for the production of this machinima. We are also concerned with its content. The management & staff at Barbie Club do not agree with any sexual act involving minors, even when the characters are virtual. This machinima could be classed as an act of griefing. We will be discussing this with LindenLabs to see if action can be taken. We do not want a few rotten apples tarnishing the 16 months of hard work we’ve put in to build up the Barbie Club.

By: King Frederick

King Frederick — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 19:19:04 +0000

I just went back to the place in that screenshot to get a couple pictures of the poseballs, when I encountered this scene instead.

**This image is not safe for work, not safe for your family, and not safe for your soul. I have covered the genitals up with traffic signs**

http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h94/ignavus/Image1-7.jpg

And here, an even more disgusting screenshot, with the person’s profile description: “Precocious and curious 8 year-old, easily led astray especially by adults”

http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h94/ignavus/Image3censored.jpg

I wonder what kind of “childrens’ books” Crissa has been reading?

By: King Frederick

King Frederick — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 19:05:02 +0000

“Oh, goodness me! Are you telling me it’s immoral or illegal for adults to pretend to be children?”

Some ageplayer always comes in and says “I just like to pretend to be five years old. I only want to play tea with my pretend sister and pretend daddy. I don’t have sex! How dare you smear me with a broad brush!”

No one is talking about you. Please stop playing dumb.

It was already made clear who the discussion is about:

http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h94/ignavus/SecondLife/SickenedLife1.jpg

We are talking about the pedophile subset of the “ageplayer” community.

Don’t obfuscate.

By: Don't date him girl

Don't date him girl — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:41:48 +0000

Done…
http://dontdatehimgirl.com/search/cheater.asp?ddh_id=33411&return_url=index%2Easp%3F

By: Crissa

Crissa — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:02:42 +0000

PS – some of the constraints on modifying the avatar mesh are officially designed to limit players from making ‘underaged’ avatars, according to a Linden dev.

So… They already try to stop it. But it’s rather pointless, as long as we can manipulate the animations. How about going after real porn rather than virtual porn, eh?

By: Crissa

Crissa — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:59:44 +0000

Oh, goodness me! Are you telling me it’s immoral or illegal for adults to pretend to be children?

I suppose we should lock up all those authors of childrens’ books, then!

By: King Frederick

King Frederick — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:18:01 +0000

Oh, goodness, here come the puritanical cretins with their caterwauling. “Pedophilia is bad,” they say, “we should strongly discourage people who use Second Life to create child pornography,” they say. Don’t they know that if you take the child pornography out of Second Life it will ruin our ability to create child avatars for harmless purposes?

~sighs wistfully~