<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Ginko&#8217;s Alleged Ponzi Game About to Implode?  Will Linden Lab be Held Liable?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alphavilleherald.com/2007/02/yield_down_60_i.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2007/02/yield_down_60_i.html</link>
	<description>Always Fairly Unbalanced</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2016 13:18:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayfinder Wishbringer</title>
		<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2007/02/yield_down_60_i.html/comment-page-1#comment-36486</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayfinder Wishbringer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 09:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_2/?p=1487#comment-36486</guid>
		<description>&gt;Which is the dot-com/dot-bomb sequence that will happen with Second Life if the status quo remains. -- Petey&lt;

I&#039;m glad to see that someone else views SL as a potential dot.com bust.  Mind you, LL might yet turn things around and pull out of their 2+ year tailspin, but geez, I&#039;ve rarely seen a more unstable platform or unstable company in the time I&#039;ve used the internet-- and I&#039;m in the business.

&gt;A) Its controlling entity says it isn&#039;t one
B) There *is* a controlling entity, who has unfettered access into the &quot;wallets&quot; of its users and retains the right to inflate/deflate/disseminate/reappropriate the &quot;currency&quot; at its whim.
C) By and large, people do not use it for anything outside of the game.

&gt;The only way you could regard L$ as a currency is if you were so swept up in the roleplaying that you lost perspective on the situation as a whole. -- Petey&lt;

There&#039;s quite a debate over this.  I have never regarded L$ as &quot;currency&quot; in the legal sense; to me it was monopoly money.  However, it IS a tradeable good, which means it has RL value.  As such, while it might not be considered &quot;currency&quot; per se... but it is an asset with real value.  So while it might not catch IRS scrutiny as money earned, it might very well catch their attention as a capital gain.

If that happens... they could consider such retroactively-- upon which LL and associates will have major coronaries.



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>Which is the dot-com/dot-bomb sequence that will happen with Second Life if the status quo remains. &#8212; Petey< I'm glad to see that someone else views SL as a potential dot.com bust.  Mind you, LL might yet turn things around and pull out of their 2+ year tailspin, but geez, I've rarely seen a more unstable platform or unstable company in the time I've used the internet-- and I'm in the business.</p>
<p>>A) Its controlling entity says it isn&#8217;t one<br />
B) There *is* a controlling entity, who has unfettered access into the &#8220;wallets&#8221; of its users and retains the right to inflate/deflate/disseminate/reappropriate the &#8220;currency&#8221; at its whim.<br />
C) By and large, people do not use it for anything outside of the game.</p>
<p>>The only way you could regard L$ as a currency is if you were so swept up in the roleplaying that you lost perspective on the situation as a whole. &#8212; Petey<</p>
<p>There&#8217;s quite a debate over this.  I have never regarded L$ as &#8220;currency&#8221; in the legal sense; to me it was monopoly money.  However, it IS a tradeable good, which means it has RL value.  As such, while it might not be considered &#8220;currency&#8221; per se&#8230; but it is an asset with real value.  So while it might not catch IRS scrutiny as money earned, it might very well catch their attention as a capital gain.</p>
<p>If that happens&#8230; they could consider such retroactively&#8211; upon which LL and associates will have major coronaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petey</title>
		<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2007/02/yield_down_60_i.html/comment-page-1#comment-36485</link>
		<dc:creator>Petey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 03:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_2/?p=1487#comment-36485</guid>
		<description>&quot;Isn&#039;t that what a lot of people were saying about the internet economy just before the bubble burst in 2000/2001? When the NASDAQ hit 5000, I remember predictions in Wired about it making it all the way to 25,000 in a few years and that it&#039;s unprecedented rise showed that there were new economic models being created. Soon after that the market collapsed.&quot;

Which is the dot-com/dot-bomb sequence that will happen with Second Life if the status quo remains.

Prok is right, guys. Yeah, yeah, all currency is just what we agree to accord value to. If I want to pay you in Monopoly money and you agree to take it that&#039;s fine, ok, thanks for getting the fifth grade revelation of subjective reality a little late.

The Linden Dollar isn&#039;t a currency for a few reasons:

A) Its controlling entity says it isn&#039;t one
B) There *is* a controlling entity, who has unfettered access into the &quot;wallets&quot; of its users and retains the right to inflate/deflate/disseminate/reappropriate the &quot;currency&quot; at its whim.
C) By and large, people do not use it for anything outside of the game.

The only way you could regard L$ as a currency is if you were so swept up in the roleplaying that you lost perspective on the situation as a whole.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Isn&#8217;t that what a lot of people were saying about the internet economy just before the bubble burst in 2000/2001? When the NASDAQ hit 5000, I remember predictions in Wired about it making it all the way to 25,000 in a few years and that it&#8217;s unprecedented rise showed that there were new economic models being created. Soon after that the market collapsed.&#8221;</p>
<p>Which is the dot-com/dot-bomb sequence that will happen with Second Life if the status quo remains.</p>
<p>Prok is right, guys. Yeah, yeah, all currency is just what we agree to accord value to. If I want to pay you in Monopoly money and you agree to take it that&#8217;s fine, ok, thanks for getting the fifth grade revelation of subjective reality a little late.</p>
<p>The Linden Dollar isn&#8217;t a currency for a few reasons:</p>
<p>A) Its controlling entity says it isn&#8217;t one<br />
B) There *is* a controlling entity, who has unfettered access into the &#8220;wallets&#8221; of its users and retains the right to inflate/deflate/disseminate/reappropriate the &#8220;currency&#8221; at its whim.<br />
C) By and large, people do not use it for anything outside of the game.</p>
<p>The only way you could regard L$ as a currency is if you were so swept up in the roleplaying that you lost perspective on the situation as a whole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Urizenus</title>
		<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2007/02/yield_down_60_i.html/comment-page-1#comment-36484</link>
		<dc:creator>Urizenus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 21:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_2/?p=1487#comment-36484</guid>
		<description>What are you talking about EM.  People accept Linden dollars for RL work and goods all the time.  And in any case, the borders of the magic circle are so porous here that I don&#039;t see how you can classify the goods and services offered &quot;in world&quot; as not being RL either.  They just happen to be digital and delivered via the internet, but then so is much of the music, software, and other forms of entertainment that we download.

No currency is accepted everywhere.  The Zimbabwean dollar (if there is such a thing) may not be the most stable currency in the world, yet no economist would deny that it is still a currency. I don&#039;t see why an economist would deny that the Linden dollar is a currency, even if the central bank is in effect Linden Lab rather than a third world government.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you talking about EM.  People accept Linden dollars for RL work and goods all the time.  And in any case, the borders of the magic circle are so porous here that I don&#8217;t see how you can classify the goods and services offered &#8220;in world&#8221; as not being RL either.  They just happen to be digital and delivered via the internet, but then so is much of the music, software, and other forms of entertainment that we download.</p>
<p>No currency is accepted everywhere.  The Zimbabwean dollar (if there is such a thing) may not be the most stable currency in the world, yet no economist would deny that it is still a currency. I don&#8217;t see why an economist would deny that the Linden dollar is a currency, even if the central bank is in effect Linden Lab rather than a third world government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Economic Mip</title>
		<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2007/02/yield_down_60_i.html/comment-page-1#comment-36483</link>
		<dc:creator>Economic Mip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 20:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_2/?p=1487#comment-36483</guid>
		<description>What gives a currency value is that it is acceptable as a means of payment by someone in real life. Now by this definition, the Linden is not a currency nor is the Somaliland shilling, or (outside of Zimbabwe) the Zimbabwean dollar. Now hopefully one will realize that I am not saying that Lindens are worthless, only that due to their origin they cannot be technically or legally considered a currency. They are more on par with an arcade game token. Unless this changes, few real life banks (especially those in developing countries) are going to set up shop in Second Life due to the high risks of a private corporate owned money system. A shame, because it would make Zimbabwean money laundering (oops I mean &quot;remittance payments&quot; ) much easier.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What gives a currency value is that it is acceptable as a means of payment by someone in real life. Now by this definition, the Linden is not a currency nor is the Somaliland shilling, or (outside of Zimbabwe) the Zimbabwean dollar. Now hopefully one will realize that I am not saying that Lindens are worthless, only that due to their origin they cannot be technically or legally considered a currency. They are more on par with an arcade game token. Unless this changes, few real life banks (especially those in developing countries) are going to set up shop in Second Life due to the high risks of a private corporate owned money system. A shame, because it would make Zimbabwean money laundering (oops I mean &#8220;remittance payments&#8221; ) much easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doubledown Tandino</title>
		<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2007/02/yield_down_60_i.html/comment-page-1#comment-36482</link>
		<dc:creator>Doubledown Tandino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 20:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_2/?p=1487#comment-36482</guid>
		<description>Do I think Ginko is in some way fraudulent now? Yes
Do I think Ginko is a ponzi? Yes
Do I have any proof of it? No
Do I think at some point in the future Ginko will suddenly vanish with the money? Maybe
Do I think Ginko would be held liable?  This all depends on the courts determining how real SL of money are.
Do I think Linden Lab is in any way responsible? No


...Do I use Ginko?  All the time.  They&#039;ve been great. Better customer service than LL, and I&#039;ve made a lot on excellent interest rates.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do I think Ginko is in some way fraudulent now? Yes<br />
Do I think Ginko is a ponzi? Yes<br />
Do I have any proof of it? No<br />
Do I think at some point in the future Ginko will suddenly vanish with the money? Maybe<br />
Do I think Ginko would be held liable?  This all depends on the courts determining how real SL of money are.<br />
Do I think Linden Lab is in any way responsible? No</p>
<p>&#8230;Do I use Ginko?  All the time.  They&#8217;ve been great. Better customer service than LL, and I&#8217;ve made a lot on excellent interest rates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IntLibber Brautigan</title>
		<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2007/02/yield_down_60_i.html/comment-page-1#comment-36481</link>
		<dc:creator>IntLibber Brautigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_2/?p=1487#comment-36481</guid>
		<description>Oh, and Prok: No, the dollar is not backed. Firstly, its not a dollar, its a debt note issued by the Federal Reserve System, which is a private bank, the US govt does not own it or even any stock in it, the govt gets the right to appoint the Chair of the Fed board in exchange for giving the Fed the monopoly right to issue fiat currency, and guaranteeing that the US will pay up if the Fed goes tits up. Even the Fed will admit this if you ask them.

Federal Reserve Notes are almost entirely backed by other debts: US T-Bills, i.e. US Govt debt. The Fed holds a small amount of gold certificates and gold boullion, which were turned over to it in 1933 by FDR when he declared a state of national emergency (i.e. national bankruptcy). While the gold bugs think that backing debt with debt is insane, it all depends on whose debt you are talking about, and whether those person have sufficient assets and cash flow to pay the debts. Currently 40% of the land in the US is government owned (local, state, and federal), and is valued somewhere between $22-30 trillion US. This is obviously sufficient to collateralize current US debts, and much of its future liabilities (when those liabilities come due, that land will likely be worth much more, so its no big deal).

So you can say that, at least indirectly, the Federal Reserve Note is backed by the national parks, military bases, and other federal facilities, just as your mortgage on your house is backed by the value of your home.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and Prok: No, the dollar is not backed. Firstly, its not a dollar, its a debt note issued by the Federal Reserve System, which is a private bank, the US govt does not own it or even any stock in it, the govt gets the right to appoint the Chair of the Fed board in exchange for giving the Fed the monopoly right to issue fiat currency, and guaranteeing that the US will pay up if the Fed goes tits up. Even the Fed will admit this if you ask them.</p>
<p>Federal Reserve Notes are almost entirely backed by other debts: US T-Bills, i.e. US Govt debt. The Fed holds a small amount of gold certificates and gold boullion, which were turned over to it in 1933 by FDR when he declared a state of national emergency (i.e. national bankruptcy). While the gold bugs think that backing debt with debt is insane, it all depends on whose debt you are talking about, and whether those person have sufficient assets and cash flow to pay the debts. Currently 40% of the land in the US is government owned (local, state, and federal), and is valued somewhere between $22-30 trillion US. This is obviously sufficient to collateralize current US debts, and much of its future liabilities (when those liabilities come due, that land will likely be worth much more, so its no big deal).</p>
<p>So you can say that, at least indirectly, the Federal Reserve Note is backed by the national parks, military bases, and other federal facilities, just as your mortgage on your house is backed by the value of your home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IntLibber Brautigan</title>
		<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2007/02/yield_down_60_i.html/comment-page-1#comment-36480</link>
		<dc:creator>IntLibber Brautigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_2/?p=1487#comment-36480</guid>
		<description>The real trouble with the Grameen Bank comparison is that its entirely backwards in an anti-Robin Hood sense. Ginko does not lend money to SL people or ventures, period. They told me this specifically when I went to them to seek financing for my first sim buys.

So, if Phillip thinks that zero loans is quantitatively equal to &quot;microloans&quot;, he&#039;s spinning Ginko like a White House press secretary.

For the other consumers in SL interested in the issue, I can share my own experiences with different SL banks:

My Second Bank (formerly Meta Bank): financed my first land purchase of a half sim, pretty transparent about who the owners are, actually enjoy talking to you IRL so the can ensure the people they lend to are legit. Later financed part of my estate expansion (for disclosures sake), and are always lending money to people for land purchases.

Ginko: as stated previously, not interested in investing in SL people or ventures, suspect they use their depositors money for their own real estate development. If so, and depositors are happy, then so be it, but they shouldn&#039;t call themselves a bank, they are a Real Estate Investment Trust.

NN Bank: Nonnux White&#039;s REIT. I was the first non-Nonnux White person they considered for a loan, but they kinda flaked on me, and fortunately I wound up not needing the loan. You might see her about a loan yourself.

Midas Bank: Midas Commons has his bank and his gaming empire, and has expressed interest in lending or investing with us, but have not pursued it. You might try them.

OurBank: Owned by LukeConnell Vandeverre&#039;s Hope Capital/World Stock Exchange, offers &quot;real world&quot; depositing and lending interest rates. I tend to not agree with their rationale for this, given the world of SL has an economic growth rate in the hundreds of percents, most interest rates I&#039;ve seen from other banks, which may seem high by RL standards, are actually cheap money relative to SL growth. On the plus side, Luke is dedicated to transparency and reports his ventures numbers to stockholders like a responsible corporate leader should. This gets big ethical points with me. DISCLOSURE NOTE: I am on the board of directors of Hope Capital.

There are a number of other banks popping up all the time, which I&#039;ve not checked out. Perhaps an SL Herald reporter will make the rounds and report on them all in the interest of consumer awareness.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real trouble with the Grameen Bank comparison is that its entirely backwards in an anti-Robin Hood sense. Ginko does not lend money to SL people or ventures, period. They told me this specifically when I went to them to seek financing for my first sim buys.</p>
<p>So, if Phillip thinks that zero loans is quantitatively equal to &#8220;microloans&#8221;, he&#8217;s spinning Ginko like a White House press secretary.</p>
<p>For the other consumers in SL interested in the issue, I can share my own experiences with different SL banks:</p>
<p>My Second Bank (formerly Meta Bank): financed my first land purchase of a half sim, pretty transparent about who the owners are, actually enjoy talking to you IRL so the can ensure the people they lend to are legit. Later financed part of my estate expansion (for disclosures sake), and are always lending money to people for land purchases.</p>
<p>Ginko: as stated previously, not interested in investing in SL people or ventures, suspect they use their depositors money for their own real estate development. If so, and depositors are happy, then so be it, but they shouldn&#8217;t call themselves a bank, they are a Real Estate Investment Trust.</p>
<p>NN Bank: Nonnux White&#8217;s REIT. I was the first non-Nonnux White person they considered for a loan, but they kinda flaked on me, and fortunately I wound up not needing the loan. You might see her about a loan yourself.</p>
<p>Midas Bank: Midas Commons has his bank and his gaming empire, and has expressed interest in lending or investing with us, but have not pursued it. You might try them.</p>
<p>OurBank: Owned by LukeConnell Vandeverre&#8217;s Hope Capital/World Stock Exchange, offers &#8220;real world&#8221; depositing and lending interest rates. I tend to not agree with their rationale for this, given the world of SL has an economic growth rate in the hundreds of percents, most interest rates I&#8217;ve seen from other banks, which may seem high by RL standards, are actually cheap money relative to SL growth. On the plus side, Luke is dedicated to transparency and reports his ventures numbers to stockholders like a responsible corporate leader should. This gets big ethical points with me. DISCLOSURE NOTE: I am on the board of directors of Hope Capital.</p>
<p>There are a number of other banks popping up all the time, which I&#8217;ve not checked out. Perhaps an SL Herald reporter will make the rounds and report on them all in the interest of consumer awareness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.sl-post.com</title>
		<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2007/02/yield_down_60_i.html/comment-page-1#comment-36487</link>
		<dc:creator>www.sl-post.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 10:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_2/?p=1487#comment-36487</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Is Ginko&#039;s Alleged Ponzi Game About to Implode? Will Linden Lab be Held Liable?&lt;/strong&gt;

&quot;The Journal of the Business Law Society at the University of Illinois College of Law is running a well documented article on Second Life&#039;s Ginko corporation, which claims to have the equivalent of $475,000 US invested in it but which some have called ...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Is Ginko&#8217;s Alleged Ponzi Game About to Implode? Will Linden Lab be Held Liable?</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;The Journal of the Business Law Society at the University of Illinois College of Law is running a well documented article on Second Life&#8217;s Ginko corporation, which claims to have the equivalent of $475,000 US invested in it but which some have called &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nacon</title>
		<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2007/02/yield_down_60_i.html/comment-page-1#comment-36479</link>
		<dc:creator>Nacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 20:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_2/?p=1487#comment-36479</guid>
		<description>Well here&#039;s a better idea...  DON&#039;T USE IT! Dumb asses.

I only make money...  not pay money for more linden money or &quot;loan&quot; crap.

Go get some skills or lose some doughs, that&#039;s the way of money life.

(pfft..  loan beggers)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well here&#8217;s a better idea&#8230;  DON&#8217;T USE IT! Dumb asses.</p>
<p>I only make money&#8230;  not pay money for more linden money or &#8220;loan&#8221; crap.</p>
<p>Go get some skills or lose some doughs, that&#8217;s the way of money life.</p>
<p>(pfft..  loan beggers)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tad McConachie</title>
		<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2007/02/yield_down_60_i.html/comment-page-1#comment-36478</link>
		<dc:creator>Tad McConachie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 18:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_2/?p=1487#comment-36478</guid>
		<description>Alex, by dismissing my irrefutable proof of the Reptilian Humanoid &quot;conspiracy,&quot; you&#039;re either outing yourself as one of them, or just helping me prove my point.

The difference between actual, recorded history and the rantings of David Icke is that Icke is right.  He says so himself!  What more do you need?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, by dismissing my irrefutable proof of the Reptilian Humanoid &#8220;conspiracy,&#8221; you&#8217;re either outing yourself as one of them, or just helping me prove my point.</p>
<p>The difference between actual, recorded history and the rantings of David Icke is that Icke is right.  He says so himself!  What more do you need?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

