Comments on: AgePlay Sex Groups Grow 1% per Week

By: Sigmund Leominster

Sigmund Leominster — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:25:40 +0000

Nothing wrong so long as it’s a hot mom and daughter, and there’s whipped cream involved. Of course, if they’re ugly, it’s sick and disturbing…

By: Dannie

Dannie — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:41:29 +0000

nothing wrong with role or age play or virtual incest between moms and daughters. it’s only fantasy fer crying out loud.

By: sarah

sarah — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:46:33 +0000

i like to to play the little girl role…and they said i can get arrested for acting like im about 10 years younger and having virtual sex with an adult…im 19 female and i dont get how its wrong if everyones an adult….i dont agree or condone real children do it…but i am adult and so is the person i am talking with whats the probelm

By: rody

rody — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 19:29:06 +0000

By: ayman

ayman — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 18:16:48 +0000

an article which says that it is illegal for germans to gain access to those ageplay services… the german criminal code prohibits displaying sexual acts between graphical representations of children and adults. To have sex with a child-avatar in second life as a german citizen can be punished with prison sentence…

By: China Venture News

China Venture News — Sat, 11 Aug 2007 17:30:58 +0000

Sex, China, and Virtual Worlds

Some disturbing bits of news about the most popular online virtual world, Second Life, came across my desk this week and, though the news was truly disturbing, it was also insightful regarding the success of virtual worlds in cyberspace. The…

By: littlebutold

littlebutold — Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:50:08 +0000

So my problem with the new rule may be a bit unique. There is a girl at work who has a disease that makes her look very, very young. She is actually 29 years old, but she appears to be about 11 years old. If someone is familiar with the disease, please post the name as I am interested in long-term implications. Anyway, my cube is right next to hers and over the past two years we have gotten to know each other pretty well. Our unit has gone to several happy hours that both she and I attended (it is always a hoot when she orders a drink) and we have become pretty good friends. She is a very pretty young lady but has never had a romantic relationship, which I find incredibly sad. The fact is that she is an extremely nice girl and has a good career ahead of her. A “good catch” under normal circumstances.

So here is the rub. I do not want to be prevented from simulating sex, via an av, with this co-worker because of a restriction on the size of a cartoon character in a game. The truth is that I don’t really have the desire to do this, but the point remains.

By: Brace

Brace — Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:58:11 +0000

“Teams of top-notch researchers looked up groups in the Second Life search tool”

OMFG! can I borrow yalls team? I totally need help searching stuff out in SL

Its so fookin hard to do! *sobs*

By: Rock Ramona

Rock Ramona — Sun, 11 Mar 2007 19:54:08 +0000

Its really simple,anyone who has to roleplay this stuff is sick,i dont care how old you are,or how cartoony you look,it is wrong.Adding the word roleplay to it doesnt make it any less sick.Its still sick,if you are an adult humanbeing who thinks about children or animals and it makes you sexually excited enuff,then you should be seeking proffesinal help,end of F**king story,take your tier money and go see a shrink

By: Viajero

Viajero — Sun, 11 Mar 2007 12:59:22 +0000

Michael Fairplay and Kevin Mitchell, your long posts amount to an orgy of fuzzy thinking. They argue against points no one is making, and miss the simple real point. It’s really tiresome to rehash arguments which address the specific issue we’re talking about–please read previous posts carefully.

Michael, no one is confusing roleplaying with *sexual age-play*, which is the only issue we are discussing. The “give and inch and they’ll take a mile” argument you make is always a dodge. Regulation of any kind always involves messy, evolving, and tough decisions. That’s life. Why have any regulation at all in any society if you’re hamstrung by the possibility of it being abused? The key thing that matters is how to protect the most vulnerable among us–real-life children. Your pleasure and my discomfort barely matter at all, the issue is avoiding the incidence of real-life pedophilia and it’s consequences.

Kevin, your outraged post similarly misses the mark. The real argument against child-fucking in SL clearly is not about discomfort with viewing it. It’s about zero-tolerance for activity which *can* leak over to encourage real-life abuse of kids, humans who can’t defend themselves, and whose lives become hell after being raped by an adult. I don’t give a crap if you want to fuck another 50 year old playing a child in your own real-life bedroom–there is no child involved. I don’t believe that simulating this activity (which by the way likely sometimes involves real children playing child avatars) ought be enabled or tolerated by LL or the SL community for the reasons listed in posts above. You can age-play all you want, but banning *sexual age-play* would at least make it harder for this specific kind of roleplay to occur in SL and RL, and that is a good thing for real life children, such as maybe your own or kids you know.

Yes, it sure would be society attempting to force its community standards on you. We do this all the time. It would not be a bad thing.