Comments on: Op/Ed: A Neko Cyborg Asks, “Where Do We Go From Here?”

By: SYD L00N

SYD L00N — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:55:55 +0000

wow..i remember this one..think its about to to write something new

By: Syd Loon

Syd Loon — Sun, 13 May 2007 02:54:26 +0000

Wow…that was quite a thought regression…oh well I think the comments for this article are dead…to the next one =)

By: cocks

cocks — Sat, 12 May 2007 14:37:36 +0000

penis

By: mootykips

mootykips — Sat, 12 May 2007 14:19:25 +0000

gb2 /bed/ intlib/random gaiafag furry sympathizer, “Miraren Firefly”. you might as well be playing habbo. “designated anarchy zone” my ass.

By: Syd Loon

Syd Loon — Sat, 12 May 2007 09:35:36 +0000

here is a link to a petition against the age verification if anyone is interested

http://yanai.blackmage.org/sky2/?page_id=2543

By: Hazim Gazov

Hazim Gazov — Sat, 12 May 2007 03:54:40 +0000

It’s an unwritten law of SLHerald that you must flame or be flamed by Prokofy Neva in the comments at least once, or you are ultimate fail.

By: Miraren Firefly

Miraren Firefly — Sat, 12 May 2007 02:41:24 +0000

Sasara: i wouldn’t say that Prokofy Neva is a troll, as such – just a vehement arguer with a tendency towards inflammatory rhetoric, lengthy and obsessive posting, sweeping generalizations, and, as i see it, hot air. i’m always the first to point out that Prokofy is one of the primary members of his own loathed “Feted Inner Core;” that being said, he has in all other ways been a good person in my interactions with him.

To those claiming superiority by way of being Anonymoose/From Teh Intarnats and all that crap, spouting 4Chan /b/ (oh noes, i said it!!!!!!!!!) memes and giggling “LURK MOAR LAWL” at every turn:

GB2/b/ and GTFO my SL Herald. Seeing as AnoniTrolling outside Anonymous areas is auto-fail, your very existence is epic fail. Go back to the Chans, where you can spout Fresh Prince copypasta and hail Raptor Jesus and tell people that Milhouse is not a meme to your heart’s content. Anonymous areas exist for a reason: anarchy is full of LAWLS. However, it ceases to be full of LAWLS when you impose it on other people, outside of the designated anarchy zone – at that time, it becomes epic fail, the mods of whatever place you luxors are raiding go “OMG WTF IS THIS SHIT” at your faggotry, you get b&, and you’re sent crying back to AnoniLand. You then write a HOMG HUEG!!! Encyclopedia Dramatica entry about how LEGENDAAERY the raid was, get your diaper changed, and go to bed.

The immaturity of most raiders, especially as compared to the fairly impressive (and counterintuitive) maturity of /b/tards as a whole, continues to disappoint me. Stop giggling that “HAY GUYZ I HAS AN INFLAMMATORY COPYPASTAS!!! RAID TIEM NAOW PLOX??!!” and leave Prokofy alone.

Furthermore, Candleja

By: Sasara Klaar

Sasara Klaar — Sat, 12 May 2007 00:14:08 +0000

Oh, and Prokofy is a troll, dear ones. Highly successful at it, I might add. I don’t find much joy in that particular art form, but can appreciate a master at work…

By: Sasara Klaar

Sasara Klaar — Sat, 12 May 2007 00:11:40 +0000

Well, this was certainly an interesting discussion, full of frighteningly flammable straw men, not to mention plenty of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

Did anyone notice that the article was an opinion piece? Or are opinions no longer valued, excepting they be your own?

Speaking of open source – chances are you’ll find that this very website is served by open source, and likely the database storing these comments is open source. And a capitalist company is making a profit hosting it.

Open source can and does make excellent sense in a capitalist scenario, and all the wonderful, generous people who donated their time and talent to create that infrastructure benefit from it indirectly as their world is populated with better products, and in many cases jobs, as a result of their generosity.

By: Syd Loon

Syd Loon — Fri, 11 May 2007 23:03:14 +0000

I am sad to hear that Murmandamus, as i posted this to stimulate thought. This is obviously a heated debate which means that more time and further thought is necessary. I think both “sides” brought up valid points and perspectives. As there is no final say, when it comes to political debates, if there are not more then two parties, there is no democracy and no freedom of thought. If this world “Second Life” is anything, I think it is an experiment or a social model that shows us something about this world and the people in it. There are always good things and bad things to every political or social model. I think a fusion of multiple social models is necessary to get society that is open to growth and also has a strong base of creators and free thinkers that are able to speak there mind openly without criticism. Otherwise Democracy, Socialism, Anarchy and every other political or social model fails, by the very definition of a society. All the posts that I have seen were quite interesting, even those fueled by emotions and hate speech showed a side of this debate that I didn’t know existed. I hope that I can continue to write articles in the future that are able to stimulate this type of interest.