Casino club poker spielen sie jetzt online.

No small wonder you were both banned from CC.

Actually, on second thought, keep going, do it everywhere you can, then maybe you two jackaranders will get banned from some more places and we wont have to wade through quite as many pages of your puffed up, back and forth banter.

As for the ACTUAL TOPIC – I don’t think this French group is nearly as worrisome as what we are going to face when the American religious right starts to really get wind of SL. I am building my SLallout shelter as we speak.

*Buys several years worth of beef jerky, bottled water, black cherry soda and TWINKIES!*

I noticed that you mention *csven* on 100% of your posts. I just hope you didn’t fall in love with him, because he left you, too, some posts ago.

“Well folks, my time on this issue is done. It was an interesting couple of weeks and I look forward to hearing further news on all fronts in the near future. All the best.
Posted by: csven | June 04, 2007 at 03:41 PM ”

Allow me to suggest a day-spa

The Lindens have actually told us in office hours that we ourselves will define what is extreme under their new “safety” stuff and report it. Will I be reporting swingsets? No, of course not. And I wouldn’t run screaming to Lindens anyway, I’d remove it myself, duh. Will I be camming into my tenants’ homes? No, not unless I have “probable cause,” and with lots of parcels and constantly moving and changing content, I doubt I’ll have that luxury. Like Lindens, I’ll have to wait for a complaint and investigate it. Will I follow the government’s directive in our subways now, “If you see something, say something!” — sure, if I see RL child porn or stuff that is so extremely violent or nasty that it seems like if I *don’t* report it and/or return it, someone will report ME to settle scores. See how this sick system works?

I feel it necessary to make a challenge to each and every Herald reporter. Who but we can try to secure freedom of speech, free of fear or favour? That’s why I think we need to show social solidarity in situations like that. It doesn’t mean getting involved in some kind of drama fest or writing or reading large amounts. It’s one line. It says “You’re out of line and I condemn what you’re doing’ when someone tries to intimidate a Herald reporter.

My God, I sure went to the mat for you when that dingbat in Terra Nova was trying to wipe the floor with you, he was way out of line.

No, you’re under no obligation to do a damn thing. Since you’re writing on this subject however, going far afield from your beat, I thought, well, why go to France? Why not look down the road in Patagonia? And BTW, I did write you first inworld, didn’t get a response for a day, and then figured I’d comment here.

>sven’s terrible debate practices are too obvious to even need comment.

Oh? Well, you’d never know it, would you? Because nobody ever says so. They need to say so. There needs to be a cacophonous chorus. Everyone who sees this too-obvious thing needs to say “you’re debate practices are terrible” and then it will force him to think twice — peer pressure is all we have, precisely because it’s an environment that should NOT be regulated.

I am, however, dismayed that you interpret my “silence” as “endorsement” with the Csven situation. Others might interpret it as “too damn busy to get involved in political drama”, or perhaps “only bothers writing about something if there’s an article in it.” I haven’t even read comments to my own articles in a couple of weeks… today was a bit of an exception.

I focus on writing news articles. They’re generally about games and business whenever possible, although if something is amusing (like this story) I’ll send it in to the Herald so that we can all have a laugh. I am, however, making a sincere effort to get the hell out of the drama biz.

So I’m not interested in debating what public statements I should have made or what my personal situation is so that I might somehow justify my opinion. I’ll keep my opinion to myself whenever it suits me and feel 100% justified in doing so for reasons I feel 100% justified NOT explaining. I don’t owe anybody an explanation for anything I do or don’t do.

I linked your blog about the Csven situation from here http://www.metaversed.com/onder-skall/blog/30-may-2007/linktasticness-may-30-2007 last week, and allowed it to speak for itself… Csven’s terrible debate practices are too obvious to even need comment. That’s not the point though… the key point is that I’m not under any OBLIGATION to comment further. My not making any particular statement DOES NOT CONDONE A DAMN THING. You can interpret it that way if you feel like it, but that’s going to be your problem, not mine. I’ll deal with my problems and live my life my way, not yours. OK?

Apologies for being so repetitive and vehement. It’s aggravating to be dealing with this kind of accusation in a public forum rather than through email.

I think that we should block MSN Messenger, Google Images, Meetic and MySpace too. By the way, take care to the Teletubbies !

Please do not imagine this is a way of thinking in France or Europe !

Pierre-Olivier… from France (pcarles at gmail dot com)

They very few people that give a shit that you were locked out of another web page will contact you to bolster your ego ….

do not bother trying to make a rebuttal to any of this either Prokofy dear – You’ll just be proving each and every word true as you always do when ‘pushing back’ or any other such nonsense you may spew to justify what amounts to a hissy fit from someone who, by all accounts, should be old enough to have grown out of that grade school mentality.