<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Philosophy of Second Life, Part 1:  On the Origins of FIC Ideology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alphavilleherald.com/2007/07/philosophy-of-s.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2007/07/philosophy-of-s.html</link>
	<description>Always Fairly Unbalanced</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2016 13:18:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2007/07/philosophy-of-s.html/comment-page-1#comment-26168</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_2/?p=1195#comment-26168</guid>
		<description>Coincidental Avatar: &quot;I wrote earlier about Anarchist terrorist in Europe in 19th century. Of course, I should have pointed out the Oklahoma City bombing by two American Anarchists in the late 20th century.&quot;

Firstly, they were not anarchists, they were white supremacists, who tend to be populist/socialist in their politics. Though don&#039;t let that confuse you with the facts, your mind is obviously made up.

Secondly, they attacked a government facility, which automatically makes their attack NOT terrorism, since the definition of terrorism is to attack civillians to put them into a state of terror. Attacking government facilities is a legitimate act of lawful warfare, ergo the Oklahoma City bombing was not terrorism, no matter what the media and the government claim.

However, the Murrah Building bombing WAS a War Crime under the Geneva Conventions, because McVeigh specifically detonated his bomb when he knew the daycare center for government employees was in operation. So McVeigh deserved to die for his crime.

However, the Geneva Conventions also state that it&#039;s a War Crime for a government to use non-government persons or civilians as human shields to protect themselves against attacks. So the US Government is as much a war criminal for the deaths at the Murrah building as Tim McVeigh is.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coincidental Avatar: &#8220;I wrote earlier about Anarchist terrorist in Europe in 19th century. Of course, I should have pointed out the Oklahoma City bombing by two American Anarchists in the late 20th century.&#8221;</p>
<p>Firstly, they were not anarchists, they were white supremacists, who tend to be populist/socialist in their politics. Though don&#8217;t let that confuse you with the facts, your mind is obviously made up.</p>
<p>Secondly, they attacked a government facility, which automatically makes their attack NOT terrorism, since the definition of terrorism is to attack civillians to put them into a state of terror. Attacking government facilities is a legitimate act of lawful warfare, ergo the Oklahoma City bombing was not terrorism, no matter what the media and the government claim.</p>
<p>However, the Murrah Building bombing WAS a War Crime under the Geneva Conventions, because McVeigh specifically detonated his bomb when he knew the daycare center for government employees was in operation. So McVeigh deserved to die for his crime.</p>
<p>However, the Geneva Conventions also state that it&#8217;s a War Crime for a government to use non-government persons or civilians as human shields to protect themselves against attacks. So the US Government is as much a war criminal for the deaths at the Murrah building as Tim McVeigh is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Schack</title>
		<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2007/07/philosophy-of-s.html/comment-page-1#comment-26167</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Schack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 04:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_2/?p=1195#comment-26167</guid>
		<description>&gt;Why were you in the sim, Jim?
&gt;Why were you in the sim, Jim?
&gt;Why were you in the sim, Jim?
&gt;Why were you in the sim, Jim?
&gt;Why were you in the sim, Jim?
&gt;Why were you in the sim, Jim?

If you are not going to listen, either will I.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>Why were you in the sim, Jim?<br />
>Why were you in the sim, Jim?<br />
>Why were you in the sim, Jim?<br />
>Why were you in the sim, Jim?<br />
>Why were you in the sim, Jim?<br />
>Why were you in the sim, Jim?</p>
<p>If you are not going to listen, either will I.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prokofy Neva</title>
		<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2007/07/philosophy-of-s.html/comment-page-1#comment-26166</link>
		<dc:creator>Prokofy Neva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 01:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_2/?p=1195#comment-26166</guid>
		<description>&lt;Aslo who thinks that anyone who is in a sim while one person is greifing is involved in an SL wide conspiracy with all the SL bigwigs to take her cats away. Do you REALLY wanna play the who has no life card Prok?

Why were you in the sim, Jim?

&gt;According to the New England Skeptical Sociality&#039;s list of 20 logical fallacies you manage to break 5 in the post.

Why were you in the sim, Jim?

&gt;Argument from Personal Incredulity - I don&#039;t understand anarchism/Anarcho-captitalism, therefore it cannot be true.

Why were you in the sim, Jim?

&gt;False Continuum - The idea that because there is no definitive demarcation line between two extremes, that the distinction between the extremes is not real or meaningful: There is a fuzzy line between chaos and anarchism, therefore it&#039;s the same.

Why were you in the sim, Jim?

&lt;Ad hominem - Do I Need to go into this?

Why were you in the sim, Jim?

&gt;Unstated Major Premise - This fallacy occurs when one makes an argument which assumes a premise which is not explicitly stated. For example, Because anarchism is an extension of libertarians, Int must also be a geo-libertarian and a hypocrite of that philosophy because waterways and roads are privately owned.

Why were you in the sim, Jim?

&gt;But pointing out logical fallacies in Prokofy&#039;s &quot;logic&quot; is like shooting fish in a barrel. It&#039;s neither difficult nor productive.

Why were you in the sim, Jim?

&gt;Anarchism as an ideology didn&#039;t survive the darwinian test in Europe, but has not yet become extinct in the USA. Partly because the voting system in the USA is so lame and archaic.

Why were you in the sim, Jim?

&gt;Social Darwinism and anarcho-capitalism are not the same where as the philosophy denies and dissalows the existence of charities. An-caps address helping the less fortunate on a voluntary basis. It&#039;s the replacement of government programs and functions into the hands of private individuals and organizations in the marketplace.

Why were you in the sim, Jim?

&gt;Anarchism by definition excludes capitalism. Anarcho-capitalism just means the brand of capitalism in which the capitalist class is above the law. (When you hear nowadays somebody saying that the USA is a capitalist country (s)he means that politicians are for sale.)

Why were you in the sim, Jim?

&gt;So you are accepting the Karl Marx definition of capitalism which is actually called corporatism, mercentilism or fascism. Capitalism can only exist in the absence of government regulation. America is not a capitalist country. Also, how can you have a capitalist class or laws in a stateless society?

Why were you in the sim, Jim?

&gt;There are people in SL who behave like anarcho-capitalists. It is part of entertainment provided by SL to watch if RL law enforcement will do anything with them and when.

&gt;If you are in SL, you are participating in a fee simple land based anarcho-capitalism with evident divine intervention. If the Linden gods see troublemakers, they use the all-wise all knowing abilities to investigate and squash them. I&#039;ve yet to hear of a trial or tribunal of any kind in SL.

Why were you in the sim, Jim?

&gt;People here promoting American Anarchism are cherry pickers. They want to have it both ways. I suspect that an average anarchism promoter is a small crook who somehow wants to glorify his selfishness as an ideology. You see, similarly Satanists are mostly mental cases glorifying their low IQ as a religion.

Why were you in the sim, Jim?

&gt;As I explained to Prokofy, ad Ad hominem are a logical fallacy. But I will address a point you make about selfishness. What activity do people engage in that is NOT selfish? There is nothing that humans do that is not in their own interest. Even acts of &quot;selflessness&quot; are driving by a passion to feel good about themselves.

Why were you in the sim, Jim?

&gt;I have seen peeps in business suits crying for anarchism (so called self-regulation). As soon as they have been robbed or burned, they somehow stop promoting anarchism :-)

Why were you in the sim, Jim?

&gt;It&#039;s kind of hard to apprehend or arrest individuals in SL yourself or with private security like it is in RL. Until I can restrain mootykips or Nep Plasma for voilating my property, I have one other choice, don&#039;t I?

Why were you in the sim, Jim?

&gt;So because big governments kill people so will individuals? That is a non-sequitur, Coincidental.

Why were you in the sim, Jim?

&gt;Read &quot;Snow Crash&quot; by Neal Stephenson which is what they said they are modeling SL after.

Why were you in the sim, Jim?

&gt;Who&#039;d wanna sick their dick in that?! o_O

Why were you in the sim, Jim?

Now this is the story all about how
My life got flipped, turned upside down
And Id like to take a minute just sit right there
Ill tell you how I became the prince of a town called bel-air

In west philadelfia born and raised
On the playground where I spent most of my days
Chilling out, maxing, relaxing all cool
And all shooting some b-ball outside of the school
When a couple of guys said were up in no good
Started making trouble in my neighbourhood
I got in one little fight and my mom got scared
And said youre moving with your aunte and uncle in bel-air

(only the first three episodes of season one)

I begged and pleaded with her the other day
But she packed my suitcase and sent me on my way
She gave me a kissin and she gave me my ticket
I put my walkman on and said I might aswell kick it

First class, yo this is bad,
Drinking orange juice out of a champagne glass
Is this what the people of bel-air livin like,
Hmm this might be alright!

I whistled for a cab and when it came near the
Licensplate said fresh and had a dice in the mirror
If anything I could say that this cab was rare
But I thought now forget it, yo home to bel-air

I pulled up to a house about seven or eight
And I yelled to the cabby yo, home smell you later
Looked at my kingdom I was finally there
To settle my throne as the prince of bel-air
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><aslo who thinks that anyone who is in a sim while one person is greifing is involved in an SL wide conspiracy with all the SL bigwigs to take her cats away. Do you REALLY wanna play the who has no life card Prok?</p>
<p>Why were you in the sim, Jim?</p>
<p>>According to the New England Skeptical Sociality&#8217;s list of 20 logical fallacies you manage to break 5 in the post.</p>
<p>Why were you in the sim, Jim?</p>
<p>>Argument from Personal Incredulity &#8211; I don&#8217;t understand anarchism/Anarcho-captitalism, therefore it cannot be true.</p>
<p>Why were you in the sim, Jim?</p>
<p>>False Continuum &#8211; The idea that because there is no definitive demarcation line between two extremes, that the distinction between the extremes is not real or meaningful: There is a fuzzy line between chaos and anarchism, therefore it&#8217;s the same.</p>
<p>Why were you in the sim, Jim?</p>
<p><ad hominem - Do I Need to go into this?</p>
<p>Why were you in the sim, Jim?</p>
<p>>Unstated Major Premise &#8211; This fallacy occurs when one makes an argument which assumes a premise which is not explicitly stated. For example, Because anarchism is an extension of libertarians, Int must also be a geo-libertarian and a hypocrite of that philosophy because waterways and roads are privately owned.</p>
<p>Why were you in the sim, Jim?</p>
<p>>But pointing out logical fallacies in Prokofy&#8217;s &#8220;logic&#8221; is like shooting fish in a barrel. It&#8217;s neither difficult nor productive.</p>
<p>Why were you in the sim, Jim?</p>
<p>>Anarchism as an ideology didn&#8217;t survive the darwinian test in Europe, but has not yet become extinct in the USA. Partly because the voting system in the USA is so lame and archaic.</p>
<p>Why were you in the sim, Jim?</p>
<p>>Social Darwinism and anarcho-capitalism are not the same where as the philosophy denies and dissalows the existence of charities. An-caps address helping the less fortunate on a voluntary basis. It&#8217;s the replacement of government programs and functions into the hands of private individuals and organizations in the marketplace.</p>
<p>Why were you in the sim, Jim?</p>
<p>>Anarchism by definition excludes capitalism. Anarcho-capitalism just means the brand of capitalism in which the capitalist class is above the law. (When you hear nowadays somebody saying that the USA is a capitalist country (s)he means that politicians are for sale.)</p>
<p>Why were you in the sim, Jim?</p>
<p>>So you are accepting the Karl Marx definition of capitalism which is actually called corporatism, mercentilism or fascism. Capitalism can only exist in the absence of government regulation. America is not a capitalist country. Also, how can you have a capitalist class or laws in a stateless society?</p>
<p>Why were you in the sim, Jim?</p>
<p>>There are people in SL who behave like anarcho-capitalists. It is part of entertainment provided by SL to watch if RL law enforcement will do anything with them and when.</p>
<p>>If you are in SL, you are participating in a fee simple land based anarcho-capitalism with evident divine intervention. If the Linden gods see troublemakers, they use the all-wise all knowing abilities to investigate and squash them. I&#8217;ve yet to hear of a trial or tribunal of any kind in SL.</p>
<p>Why were you in the sim, Jim?</p>
<p>>People here promoting American Anarchism are cherry pickers. They want to have it both ways. I suspect that an average anarchism promoter is a small crook who somehow wants to glorify his selfishness as an ideology. You see, similarly Satanists are mostly mental cases glorifying their low IQ as a religion.</p>
<p>Why were you in the sim, Jim?</p>
<p>>As I explained to Prokofy, ad Ad hominem are a logical fallacy. But I will address a point you make about selfishness. What activity do people engage in that is NOT selfish? There is nothing that humans do that is not in their own interest. Even acts of &#8220;selflessness&#8221; are driving by a passion to feel good about themselves.</p>
<p>Why were you in the sim, Jim?</p>
<p>>I have seen peeps in business suits crying for anarchism (so called self-regulation). As soon as they have been robbed or burned, they somehow stop promoting anarchism :-)</p>
<p>Why were you in the sim, Jim?</p>
<p>>It&#8217;s kind of hard to apprehend or arrest individuals in SL yourself or with private security like it is in RL. Until I can restrain mootykips or Nep Plasma for voilating my property, I have one other choice, don&#8217;t I?</p>
<p>Why were you in the sim, Jim?</p>
<p>>So because big governments kill people so will individuals? That is a non-sequitur, Coincidental.</p>
<p>Why were you in the sim, Jim?</p>
<p>>Read &#8220;Snow Crash&#8221; by Neal Stephenson which is what they said they are modeling SL after.</p>
<p>Why were you in the sim, Jim?</p>
<p>>Who&#8217;d wanna sick their dick in that?! o_O</p>
<p>Why were you in the sim, Jim?</p>
<p>Now this is the story all about how<br />
My life got flipped, turned upside down<br />
And Id like to take a minute just sit right there<br />
Ill tell you how I became the prince of a town called bel-air</p>
<p>In west philadelfia born and raised<br />
On the playground where I spent most of my days<br />
Chilling out, maxing, relaxing all cool<br />
And all shooting some b-ball outside of the school<br />
When a couple of guys said were up in no good<br />
Started making trouble in my neighbourhood<br />
I got in one little fight and my mom got scared<br />
And said youre moving with your aunte and uncle in bel-air</p>
<p>(only the first three episodes of season one)</p>
<p>I begged and pleaded with her the other day<br />
But she packed my suitcase and sent me on my way<br />
She gave me a kissin and she gave me my ticket<br />
I put my walkman on and said I might aswell kick it</p>
<p>First class, yo this is bad,<br />
Drinking orange juice out of a champagne glass<br />
Is this what the people of bel-air livin like,<br />
Hmm this might be alright!</p>
<p>I whistled for a cab and when it came near the<br />
Licensplate said fresh and had a dice in the mirror<br />
If anything I could say that this cab was rare<br />
But I thought now forget it, yo home to bel-air</p>
<p>I pulled up to a house about seven or eight<br />
And I yelled to the cabby yo, home smell you later<br />
Looked at my kingdom I was finally there<br />
To settle my throne as the prince of bel-air</ad></aslo></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prokofy Neva</title>
		<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2007/07/philosophy-of-s.html/comment-page-1#comment-26165</link>
		<dc:creator>Prokofy Neva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 01:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_2/?p=1195#comment-26165</guid>
		<description>Squeezeone, I totally agree with how retarded the &quot;one laptop&quot; thing is. It&#039;s infantilizing to the peoples of Africa, and profoundly racist at some level, to select out only that portion of their societies that constitutes &quot;cute kids&quot; and only do for them, and not for adults who are obviously needed as much if not more in society. I&#039;d rather have &quot;one $100 extra in every medical person&#039;s salary&quot; than this idiotic plan which is more of that infatuation old dead white guys have for young live brown boys. Projects like this are like taking monkey glands or something, they relive their youth and style themselves as heroes of mankind.

Tech-tards of course abound in SL, but i disagree that the masses don&#039;t try new things. They&#039;ve learned to swipe cards and bank online and check stock online and everything else. It&#039;s not the specialized arcane knowledge that the tekkies imagine.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Squeezeone, I totally agree with how retarded the &#8220;one laptop&#8221; thing is. It&#8217;s infantilizing to the peoples of Africa, and profoundly racist at some level, to select out only that portion of their societies that constitutes &#8220;cute kids&#8221; and only do for them, and not for adults who are obviously needed as much if not more in society. I&#8217;d rather have &#8220;one $100 extra in every medical person&#8217;s salary&#8221; than this idiotic plan which is more of that infatuation old dead white guys have for young live brown boys. Projects like this are like taking monkey glands or something, they relive their youth and style themselves as heroes of mankind.</p>
<p>Tech-tards of course abound in SL, but i disagree that the masses don&#8217;t try new things. They&#8217;ve learned to swipe cards and bank online and check stock online and everything else. It&#8217;s not the specialized arcane knowledge that the tekkies imagine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SqueezeOne Pow</title>
		<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2007/07/philosophy-of-s.html/comment-page-1#comment-26164</link>
		<dc:creator>SqueezeOne Pow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 15:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_2/?p=1195#comment-26164</guid>
		<description>I think SL is a prime example of basic Tribal Anarchism with a little moderation by LL. You basically have groups of people (we&#039;ll call them &quot;tribes&quot; in this post) that trade and interract with each other but have their own grounds with their own sets of tribal rules (Caledon, Vampires, Gor, Furries, Star Wars fans, etc.).

The only rule of the entire land is (in general) live and let live. This is enforced by LL...some would say inconsistantly, but it&#039;s the thought that counts I guess ;)

Despite the few bad apples that this system naturally creates (script-wielding griefers and their more stealthy counterparts the social griefers and &quot;busy-bodies&quot;) I think it&#039;s working. People can make their money or play war or be as fruity as they wanna be.

There is always going to be waste in any type of productive society. The only thing the rest of us can do is try to convert that waste into someone that has value to be added to the community they choose to take up space in.

HOWEVER, I don&#039;t think this would work on a large scale such as the &quot;real world&quot;. For all it&#039;s diversity, all SL residents have a couple things in common: they have at least a basic knowledge of technology and they are (or were at one time before they got bitter) willing to try new things and explore new ideas.

A majority of the world&#039;s population doesn&#039;t share these characteristics.

The consumerist &quot;tech-tard&quot; (I&#039;m coining a new, cooler phraze as of NOW) utopian philosophy isn&#039;t based on reality and is somewhat ethnocentric. Sure these new technologies will let people in Africa or Honduras or Afghanistan communicate and have the same level of visibility as a kid in Malibu, but what are the tech-tards doing to help everyone even AFFORD it?

I hate to agree with Bill Gates but he summed it up with his criticism of the &quot;Laptop for Every Child&quot; program. He said that this program was pointless because what good is a laptop to a kid who that can&#039;t get enough to eat and has no home?

This was a great article. I wish there were more things like this coming out of the Herald!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think SL is a prime example of basic Tribal Anarchism with a little moderation by LL. You basically have groups of people (we&#8217;ll call them &#8220;tribes&#8221; in this post) that trade and interract with each other but have their own grounds with their own sets of tribal rules (Caledon, Vampires, Gor, Furries, Star Wars fans, etc.).</p>
<p>The only rule of the entire land is (in general) live and let live. This is enforced by LL&#8230;some would say inconsistantly, but it&#8217;s the thought that counts I guess <img src='http://alphavilleherald.com/site/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Despite the few bad apples that this system naturally creates (script-wielding griefers and their more stealthy counterparts the social griefers and &#8220;busy-bodies&#8221;) I think it&#8217;s working. People can make their money or play war or be as fruity as they wanna be.</p>
<p>There is always going to be waste in any type of productive society. The only thing the rest of us can do is try to convert that waste into someone that has value to be added to the community they choose to take up space in.</p>
<p>HOWEVER, I don&#8217;t think this would work on a large scale such as the &#8220;real world&#8221;. For all it&#8217;s diversity, all SL residents have a couple things in common: they have at least a basic knowledge of technology and they are (or were at one time before they got bitter) willing to try new things and explore new ideas.</p>
<p>A majority of the world&#8217;s population doesn&#8217;t share these characteristics.</p>
<p>The consumerist &#8220;tech-tard&#8221; (I&#8217;m coining a new, cooler phraze as of NOW) utopian philosophy isn&#8217;t based on reality and is somewhat ethnocentric. Sure these new technologies will let people in Africa or Honduras or Afghanistan communicate and have the same level of visibility as a kid in Malibu, but what are the tech-tards doing to help everyone even AFFORD it?</p>
<p>I hate to agree with Bill Gates but he summed it up with his criticism of the &#8220;Laptop for Every Child&#8221; program. He said that this program was pointless because what good is a laptop to a kid who that can&#8217;t get enough to eat and has no home?</p>
<p>This was a great article. I wish there were more things like this coming out of the Herald!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brace</title>
		<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2007/07/philosophy-of-s.html/comment-page-1#comment-26163</link>
		<dc:creator>Brace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 15:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_2/?p=1195#comment-26163</guid>
		<description>zzzzzZZZzzzz....

more nakie robots PLEEZE!

this is played out boring shit


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zzzzzZZZzzzz&#8230;.</p>
<p>more nakie robots PLEEZE!</p>
<p>this is played out boring shit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Schack</title>
		<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2007/07/philosophy-of-s.html/comment-page-1#comment-26162</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Schack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 12:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_2/?p=1195#comment-26162</guid>
		<description>&gt;I wrote earlier about Anarchist terrorist in Europe in 19th century. Of course, I should have pointed out the Oklahoma City bombing by two American Anarchists in the late 20th century.

Ohh so because 2 people who share a philosophy with countless others bomb and kill people we need to paint them ALL with the same bush? You, are a bigot. Mind you conservatives bomb abortion clinics because a few did. All Christians protest funerals of dead solders because a few do it. Are all socialists and collectivists Nazis?

Also, you might need to do your homework again, McVeigh and Nichoals are/were not anarchists.

&gt;Europeans are less religious than Americans, not because they know more about science, but they know more about religion.

who cares?

&gt;If you read something anarchist crap touted here, remember while reading, that money is owned by the state and managed by the central bank.

Wrong. Lindens are backed with some kind of currency and are non inflationary (at least in world) because Linden doesn&#039;t inflate the money supply leik a central bank does.

&gt;I bet that Europeans know more about politics too, as a result of Darwinian processes.

No, that&#039;s called battered wife syndrome. Socialism and collectivism has put shackles on the Europeans for hundreds of years and abused and in one case slaughters millions of Jews. Yet for some reason they keep going back to it. Not to say America is a shiny beacon of liberty either, but at least I can still carry a gun to protect me from big government.

&gt;Your text flood combined with ignorance amazes me. Often people who don&#039;t restrict their productivity with critical intelligence are &quot;productive&quot; but useless.

Well, I&#039;m trying to have a rational debate with you about the non-aggression axiom and your lobbing cat shit faster than Pokofy. Notice how I never called you names or ad hominem attacks. Because you do, i can assume that you feel threatened and are conceding the debate.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>I wrote earlier about Anarchist terrorist in Europe in 19th century. Of course, I should have pointed out the Oklahoma City bombing by two American Anarchists in the late 20th century.</p>
<p>Ohh so because 2 people who share a philosophy with countless others bomb and kill people we need to paint them ALL with the same bush? You, are a bigot. Mind you conservatives bomb abortion clinics because a few did. All Christians protest funerals of dead solders because a few do it. Are all socialists and collectivists Nazis?</p>
<p>Also, you might need to do your homework again, McVeigh and Nichoals are/were not anarchists.</p>
<p>>Europeans are less religious than Americans, not because they know more about science, but they know more about religion.</p>
<p>who cares?</p>
<p>>If you read something anarchist crap touted here, remember while reading, that money is owned by the state and managed by the central bank.</p>
<p>Wrong. Lindens are backed with some kind of currency and are non inflationary (at least in world) because Linden doesn&#8217;t inflate the money supply leik a central bank does.</p>
<p>>I bet that Europeans know more about politics too, as a result of Darwinian processes.</p>
<p>No, that&#8217;s called battered wife syndrome. Socialism and collectivism has put shackles on the Europeans for hundreds of years and abused and in one case slaughters millions of Jews. Yet for some reason they keep going back to it. Not to say America is a shiny beacon of liberty either, but at least I can still carry a gun to protect me from big government.</p>
<p>>Your text flood combined with ignorance amazes me. Often people who don&#8217;t restrict their productivity with critical intelligence are &#8220;productive&#8221; but useless.</p>
<p>Well, I&#8217;m trying to have a rational debate with you about the non-aggression axiom and your lobbing cat shit faster than Pokofy. Notice how I never called you names or ad hominem attacks. Because you do, i can assume that you feel threatened and are conceding the debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coincidental Avatar</title>
		<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2007/07/philosophy-of-s.html/comment-page-1#comment-26161</link>
		<dc:creator>Coincidental Avatar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 05:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_2/?p=1195#comment-26161</guid>
		<description>I wrote earlier about Anarchist terrorist in Europe in 19th century. Of course, I should have pointed out the Oklahoma City bombing by two American Anarchists in the late 20th century.

@Jim Schack

Your text flood combined with ignorance amazes me. Often people who don&#039;t restrict their productivity with critical intelligence are &quot;productive&quot; but useless.

&quot;What activity do people engage in that is NOT selfish? There is nothing that humans do that is not in their own interest.&quot;

That&#039;s so common myth that I bother to educate readers: Individuals are not selfish, their genes (etc.) are.

I don&#039;t believe that peeps in LL have sufficient brainpower to model any kind of society. They are followers, not leaders and lack the capability to anticipate.
********************************************************
And about reading anarchist crap.

If you read something anarchist crap touted here, remember while reading, that money is owned by the state and managed by the central bank.
********************************************************
Europeans are less religious than Americans, not because they know more about science, but they know more about religion. I bet that Europeans know more about politics too, as a result of Darwinian processes.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote earlier about Anarchist terrorist in Europe in 19th century. Of course, I should have pointed out the Oklahoma City bombing by two American Anarchists in the late 20th century.</p>
<p>@Jim Schack</p>
<p>Your text flood combined with ignorance amazes me. Often people who don&#8217;t restrict their productivity with critical intelligence are &#8220;productive&#8221; but useless.</p>
<p>&#8220;What activity do people engage in that is NOT selfish? There is nothing that humans do that is not in their own interest.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s so common myth that I bother to educate readers: Individuals are not selfish, their genes (etc.) are.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe that peeps in LL have sufficient brainpower to model any kind of society. They are followers, not leaders and lack the capability to anticipate.<br />
********************************************************<br />
And about reading anarchist crap.</p>
<p>If you read something anarchist crap touted here, remember while reading, that money is owned by the state and managed by the central bank.<br />
********************************************************<br />
Europeans are less religious than Americans, not because they know more about science, but they know more about religion. I bet that Europeans know more about politics too, as a result of Darwinian processes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Schack</title>
		<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2007/07/philosophy-of-s.html/comment-page-1#comment-26160</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Schack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 23:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_2/?p=1195#comment-26160</guid>
		<description>----typo---
According to the New England Skeptical Sociality&#039;s list of 20 logical fallacies you manage to break 5 in the post.

---correction---
According to the New England Skeptical Sociality&#039;s list of 20 logical fallacies you manage to break 4 in the post.

that&#039;s still 1/5 of the top logical fallacies.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8212;-typo&#8212;<br />
According to the New England Skeptical Sociality&#8217;s list of 20 logical fallacies you manage to break 5 in the post.</p>
<p>&#8212;correction&#8212;<br />
According to the New England Skeptical Sociality&#8217;s list of 20 logical fallacies you manage to break 4 in the post.</p>
<p>that&#8217;s still 1/5 of the top logical fallacies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2007/07/philosophy-of-s.html/comment-page-1#comment-26159</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 22:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp_2/?p=1195#comment-26159</guid>
		<description>Jim Schack: &quot;NO U!&quot;

Cute. You prove my point.

GOOD DAY SIR!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim Schack: &#8220;NO U!&#8221;</p>
<p>Cute. You prove my point.</p>
<p>GOOD DAY SIR!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

