“funny i didnt feel a thing.”

Sorry, but yes you did. You felt afraid:

“So vivid infact that im a little concerned for our safety. im scared youre gonna hurt somebody and im scared youre gonna hurt yourself.”

Ya might as well get a tattoo on your forehead that reads “Internet: SERIOUS FUCKING BUSINESSS!!!111!!!” lol!

lol please continue with your faggy snoopy dance . . lol oh my god

“You’ve been trolled. lol!”

funny i didnt feel a thing.

you need to not be online its past your bedtime im sending you to bed and patting you on the head Good boy

As far as the Dutch politicians go, fuck ‘em. Politicians love to regulate the Hell out of everything and they usually make things worse.

As far as Second Life’s own TOS ban against sexual ageplay, it’s LL’s product and they have a legal right to ban whatever they want. And it’s not like the ban came about because of resident complaints. It came about because of horrible press and a couple of sexual ageplayers uploading RL kiddy porn.

As for people bitching on a blog, both the sexual ageplayers and the anti-sexual ageplay critics can say whatever the owners of the blog let people bitch about. Bitching and trolling about things is a big part of what the blogosphere is for ya know. *chuckles*

Sorry but SL is getting to be pathetic with all you whingers wanting to impose your will. Crikey you complain about griefers theya re only expressing the same thing but you dont like it and complain about them.

SL IS NOT RL…..but the closer you try to make it then by golly it will be.
Rape
War Destruction

In concluding Build a bridge …get over it….

“you talk too much Second Lulz.”

Same to you.

“You have such a vivid imagination.”

Same to you, cf. your standard “sexual ageplay isn’t paedophilia” argument.

“So vivid infact that im a little concerned for our safety. im scared youre gonna hurt somebody and im scared youre gonna hurt yourself.”

lol whatever! Check this out: sexual ageplayers aren’t people…they’re things.

Bet that sentiment will keep you up at night. I’ve made people mad at me on the internet a lot over the past decade but I NEVER knew I could make people feel fear with my words alone! *pats himself on the back and then does the Snoopy Dance*

“i honestly wouldnt know where to start by correcting your misconceptions.”

Of course you couldn’t correct any misconceptions I have…or anyone else’s for that matter because you’re completely unwilling to look at your own. After all, you make this big talk about being “open-minded/diversity/freedom of thought/whatever” yet you’ve shown me that you’re completely unable to look at things from the side of your opponents. Your false dichotomies are your biggest weakness, greta.

“but the more i read your posts the more im sorry i ever posted to begin with. i have other things to do.”

You’ve been trolled. lol!

Sure, greta. You don’t want to respond because you’ve run out of shit pro-ageplay recycled talking points.

“burn . . in . . .hell . .”

kk. But let me REALLY earn that comment by telling you a joke. Ready?

Q: What’s funnier than a truck full of dead sexual ageplayers?
A: Uloading them all with a pitchfork. lol!

@LOLatU

“big fat LOL @ second lulz viligdementia looks like somebody took the movie Minority Report too seriously…yeah better lock em all up before they go from roleplaying to ‘realplaying’ eh.. ya know i hear there’s some popular game…blahblahblah…horrible grammar…mouth farting…blahblah…blah”

LOL at yourself you idiot. You obviously didn’t read my earlier comment much farther up where I agreed with SqueezeOne Pow that government intervention in this would be a bad idea. Since you’re obviously a stupid motherfucker or just to lazy to read all the comments from start to finish(both I’m betting), I’ll reprint the whole thing for you:
============================================
@SqueezeOne Pow

“There are better ways to combat paedophilia than looking for ways to criminalize.”

You’re right. The government is awful at regulating things, particularly morality.

As for combatting paedophilia, I always enjoy holding a mirror up to the sexual ageplayers and showing them the awful truth about themselves. Hopefully the ones that are close to actually molesting a child will kill themselves(i.e. becoming an hero as the ED people call it) in a fit of self-loathing.

*sits back and waits for the ageplayers to start dramawhoring in this thread*

Posted by: Second Lulz Vigilante | September 11, 2007 at 05:47 PM
============================================

Only a moron like you could think that criticizing sexual ageplay=wanting to lock them all up. Do you make a hobby of shitting out false dichotomies? But even if I think governments will do a horrible job of regulating this sexual ageplay crap, that doesn’t mean I’m gonna sit back and let you pedos whitewash what ageplay really is.

“no obviously making up things is the only thing you have left. i hereby claim that “those particular ageplayers” had real pictures before they ever even heard of second life, and real pictures weren’t enough any more that they were driven to using second life.”

Ohhh, so the sexual ageplayers had the pictures first and THEN came to Second Life, is that right? Hey LOL, you just made the sexual ageplayers look as bad if not worse than I did. I’ve been saying all along that a pedophile is a pedophile and that it doesn’t end when they log off. In fact, it sounds like you’re saying that sexual ageplay and RL child porn CAN go hand in hand. greta garbo probably hates you now. lol!

These “oh but they’re only attracted to FAKE children!” argument is complete horseshit.

looks like somebody took the movie Minority Report too seriously…yeah better lock em all up before they go from roleplaying to ‘realplaying’ eh.. ya know i hear there’s some popular game on the internets called Counter-Strike where pimply angst ridden teenagers roleplay terrorists!! TERRORISTS I SAY!?! omg call homeland security the nation’s kids are training to be jihadists! raise the alert level to code pink! lock em up before they have a chance to even think about getting an AK and shooting up their schools! lol.

“Obviously, for those particular ageplayers looking at digital facsimiles of children wasn’t enough anymore. It probably wouldn’t be long before actual photos wouldn’t do it for them anymore either.”

no obviously making up things is the only thing you have left. i hereby claim that “those particular ageplayers” had real pictures before they ever even heard of second life, and real pictures weren’t enough any more that they were driven to using second life. wait how do i know that!? same way you vigildementia does.. i pulled it outta my ass! lol.

greta garbo was right.. that wasn’t worth my couple minutes
gg

well it’s at least understandable for people to be so scared of those sexually attracted to young REAL children because some of them exploit actual children and media in certain countries pounds it into the public conscience night after night like an elephant herd call spotting an approaching lion pack… they scare you with all sorts of things now.. by now i’m scared that a shark is going to learn to walk and come attack me in my sleep. not really. but i bet vigildementia is hahaha. poor guy

what scares me is people like vigildementia and Ana..they want to lock you up for even thinking about something they don’t like as a preemptive strike… child exploitation is the easy one because it’s hard to disagree that you don’t know what the hell you’re doing when you’re young and taking advantage of someone like that is horrible. problem is, cultures don’t agree on how many years after you’re born that you suddenly start knowing and stop being a child. anyway if it’s not saving the world from virtual pixel exploitation, it’s something else and something else. they just want to mold your thoughts and behavior from top to bottom but try to be clever about it. and if you disagree with any of this, the terrorists win.