Comments on: Daeynaries Lane Post 6 Grrrl

By: Nidol Slazar

Nidol Slazar — Wed, 28 Nov 2007 19:24:17 +0000

Wow, nice to see someone I know on the Herald again. =p

Mike, Artemis, whatever, GTFO

By: whatever

whatever — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:24:11 +0000

Daeynaries, why would you do a photo shoot about something that you admit you know nothing about?

As you stated “So I heard about Post 6 Grrrl, and I was like sweet… but I’m not getting naked. Anyhow I heard about it and decided I wanted to pose.”

Maybe you should have done some research before you posed for something you apparently knew nothing about other than what you had ‘heard’.

Were you just hoping to become ‘popular’ or what? As someone else stated, it seems you just want your ego stroked.

By: whatever

whatever — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:14:33 +0000

Posted by Selonna: Heaven forbid someone have a teeny tiny bit of modesty?

Post 6 really isn’t the place for modesty kiddo. That kinda defeats the purpose. Heaven forbid.

By: Daeynaries Lane

Daeynaries Lane — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 03:19:35 +0000

Look…. seriously.. I had NO… and I mean NO… idea post 6
was entirely about showing pixelated nipples. If I had known if were to be this big an issue, I would’ve stated, I was jesting. I wanted to show my outfits in entirety. Those particular outfits wouldn’t have worked topless. I didn’t mean to offend anyone.. but those who have been offended are truly grasping at straws here. Seriously… chill out.

By: Taylor Barnes

Taylor Barnes — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 01:05:24 +0000

I agree with the people who have commented that Miss Lane should have respected the spirit of Post 6, despite what Justine Babii may allow. To have a model openly admit “but I’m not getting naked” and to have Justine chuckling, only shows (coupled with the poor photography) that Miss Babii has been and still remains (after many weeks) a poor choice to lead this page. I respect friends wanting to support their friends, but perhaps your support should have started BEFORE the model decided to appear. As a former Post 6 model, I agree with Mike Reuters & Siobhan, and I would love to know Miss Lane’s motivation for appearing.

In the past I have been careful not to make comments against the models that appear, but when a model makes these types of statements, jeez…it’s like drawing a bull’s eye on her forehead and yelling “Commence Firing“!!!

Selonna: Artemis Fate’s comments were very easy to understand. If you are trying to find small fault in the Playboy statement, either you are too stubborn or you have missed the entire point. Give reason to why Miss Lane’s decision was the right and spend less time trying to degrade the people who have decided to voice their opinion that her decision was wrong.

By: Very True

Very True — Mon, 26 Nov 2007 08:21:00 +0000

BlueGum is right. The ‘photography’ is very much second rate.

By: BlueGum

BlueGum — Mon, 26 Nov 2007 05:02:42 +0000

The model is lovely but frankly some of the photography here is second rate.

Where is the post-production work? There are ugly lumps and bumps all over the model’s outline that could and should have been quickly cleaned up. If you don’t know how to do it and can’t afford a photographer who does, Vint Falken has a winderful video tutorial on youtube for you.

For example, in the last photo under the model’s right breast (which itself has a nasty sharp angular shape) there is a huge and ugly bump made all the worse by being silhouetted by her black hair.

Please, show the model’s some respect with some decent clean-up work on the shots.

By: Artemis Fate

Artemis Fate — Sun, 25 Nov 2007 23:49:41 +0000

“Uhm, Artemis? Plenty girls have posed for Playboy without going fully nude. Recently, I can recall Kim Kardashian didn’t. Maybe you’re thinking of Hustler? But again, I digress – go back to looking at pixel tits and cooch.”

I don’t actually know, I don’t read playboy. But you get the point.

I don’t really care all that much if people go nude or not in the Post 6 grrls thing, I just understand why some people might be annoyed at people not doing it.

By: Siobhan OFlynn

Siobhan OFlynn — Sun, 25 Nov 2007 20:50:20 +0000

@ Selonna “Plenty of girls have posed for Playboy without going fully nude. Recently I can recall Kim Kardashian didn’t.”

That may be true, but we’ve already seen Kim Kardashian having sex, so it’s not like we haven’t seen it all anyway.

The thing that made Post Six special was that the women (and men) who posed, some of whom are quite well known in SL, were willing to bare all (or most). I think it should go back to the way it used to be. If you don’t want to be photographed nude or semi nude, then don’t apply to be a Post Six Grrrl. It’s not so much about seeing someone naked, it’s about the person posing being comfortable enough in their own skin to be willing to pose naked.

As far as I’m concerned, Post Six without some nudity isn’t the same.

By: Nina A

Nina A — Sun, 25 Nov 2007 15:25:57 +0000

I agree with Sio…

Everything is PIXELS… her face, arms, legs etc and she’s showing that LOL. What’s to hide anyway? That skin can be seen in a shop, tits and all. I always thought Post Six was about the photography to make it real and the person to add character.

Apart from that, nice shoot and beautiful av.