So what is the difrence, focus on the context not the content….
Just a thought, before the libral nonsence insues.

Of course I am ridiculous. The whole point was to be ridiculous because ridicule is what a discussion about nippleless renditions of real world artifacts deserves. And toss ‘non sequitur’ into the mix because to leap from my ridiculous satire to having “your breasts hanging out or your dick hanging out” in Europoean cities is tangential to say the least!

I will, however, stand by the general idea of the puritanical influence in the US. Janet Jackson flashed a nipple and the whole country goes into spasm. Meanwhile in Europe, the press had a field day with laughing at – and not with – the whole episode. Any hint that a US politician has a mistress is met with immediate calls for resignation; any hint that a French minister has NO mistress and he’s branded as odd. Ex-President Bill Clinton gets a blow job and there are calls for impeachment; Ex-Deputy PM John Prescott has a fling with a mistress and the comment is “lucky bastard.” The fact you see no difference between US and European attitudes to sexuality hardly makes ME messed up!

The fact there’s even ANY discussion here about nipples is very telling. Lighten up dude, your morality’s showing!

“Adam on Hollywood.

His fig leaf on Vine.”

Could you name the European or Latin American or Asian country where it’s ok to walk down the main street of the city with both breasts hanging out or your dick hanging on. There isn’t any such place.

Oh, you have in mind an African village? Well, that’s fine. But that’s not Europe or Asia or Latin America — or even the major cities of Africa.

There is a nude beach somewhere? Ok, that’s great, hey, we even have those in America!

But your idea that “Puritans” are wrecking everybody’s normal behaviour is seriously messed up — in a way that only Puritans could indulge in.

There isn’t any place in India, China, Russia, Germany, England, Spain, Peru, Chile — name a country — where you get to walk around with your bits hanging out, and those countries can’t be said to be suffering from “Puritans,” although they have other religious and philosophical traditions that simply find it acceptable to clothe nakedness.

And why the fuss about nipples and giggle sticks in PG areas anyway? I hate to be a master of the bleedin’ obvious, but 50% of the world’s population grab a hold of their Dr. Cyclops several times a day. I might also add the male babies think nothing of tickling the trouser snake when given the chance.

Meanwhile millions of babies (and sensible adults) have their lips around someone else’s nipples on a regular basis. And hey, as an aside, why is it in the US that if a woman gets both her tits out to swing around a pole she gets paid, whereas if the same women gets one tit out to feed a baby she gets fined?

There is zero reason to hide away any genitalia because, and let’s be honest, we all know what the damn things look like!

A good friend of mine said that “America was founded by Puritans – and it still shows!” Let’s just say “No!” to the repressive revisionism. This is a practice up with which we shall not put.

“David was nekked as a jaybird – letting it all hang out – getting his freak on – swinging in the wind – au natural – in the kiddy park with an open raincoat – wearing his birthday suit – showing off his pingpong set – the man was butt-naked! Worst of all – this statue was being openly displayed on PG-rated land!!”

Wiping the tears away from my eyes as I continue to giggle.

Nothing like a bit of backwards beaureaucracy.