We’re going to have to put him down.

Then isn’t it interesting how Tizzers was banned for disclosure on a third-party website and Kalel, (who publicly released Tizzers’ information to members in-game) was not?

I believe that’s Checkmate, my friend.

Funny how screwed your view is. As far as I understand it, the TOS is for ALL of Second Life. On top of that the sims Longcat and it’s neighboring Woodbury Sea are not set to private so any one can drop on in if they wish. In other words, while owned by a person, they are open to the public who wide public. This would be a whole different issue if they were closed off like a Gor sim but they aren’t.

Also to the dolt that said GLE was committing disclosure. That only counts within Second Life and not in a third party blog such as the Herald.

I am not now, nor have I ever been a member of the Woodbury University group (maybe joining is not a bad idea, though). Those messages were sent by Scout in public chat in Sandbox Goguen. They are considered disclosure only if posted in Second Life or on the Second Life forum or website.

“You should be afraid of Frizzlefry. You should ask around and find out why.”

We purged our fear when we removed the yellow impurity from the Great Power Battery on Oa. But thanks for the warning. I’ll keep my eyes open.

“Unless you specifically name exactly WHICH furries were being assaulted in those depictions, then you have no case.”

“YIFF IN HELL FURFAGS” is intolerance. No specific name is necessary. I didn’t know about the furry safari, but that’s not what the pictures were about. Take a look at them and you will see what I mean.

“Besides, how do you know, even if there were specific individuals depicted in the images, that they were not consenting to the treatment?”

Again, look at the slogans seen on those pics. There are several of those, so even throwing out the graphics-only posters, there’s plenty of evidence of intolerance. And since the posters are located in “Kraut’s fortress of fursecution,” I think we can assume the pictures are not consensual depictions. Maybe a jailhouse lawyer could argue that there’s no proof all of those posters are intolerant, and that’s fine. I just write the AR and let the GTeam judge whether it’s valid.

“PN griefing on furries is nothing more than another one of Angel Fluffy’s big capture role-play games, haven’t you gotten that yet?”

Oh yes, all Furnation residents request regular sim-crashing raids on their homes just to satisfy their “chase me” fetish.

“Griefing is NOT putting up controversial art work in ones own home.”

Correct. Griefing is not about controversial artwork at all. It’s about violation of the CS and ToS, in “all areas of Second Life, the Second Life Forums, and the Second Life Website,” including one’s own home.

“Griefing is about going to OTHER peoples sims and interfering in their enjoyment of their land.”

That’s what Kraut Hienrichs was doing, which is why I received requests to make him stop. I am not now, and have never been a griefer.

……………………………………..________……………………
………………………………,.-‘”……………….“~.,………………
………………………..,.-”……………………………..“-.,…………
…………………….,/………………………………………..”:,……..
…………………,?………………………………………………\,…..
………………./…………………………………………………..,}….
……………../………………………………………………,:`^`..}….
……………/……………………………………………,:”………/…..
…………..?…..__…………………………………..:`………../…..
…………./__.(…..“~-,_…………………………,:`………./……..
………../(_….”~,_……..“~,_………………..,:`…….._/………..
……….{.._$;_……”=,_…….“-,_…….,.-~-,},.~”;/….}………..
………..((…..*~_…….”=-._……“;,,./`…./”…………../…………
…,,,___.\`~,……“~.,………………..`…..}…………../………….
…………(….`=-,,…….`……………………(……;_,,-”……………
…………/.`~,……`-………………………….\……/\……………….
………….\`~.*-,……………………………….|,./…..\,__………..
,,_……….}.>-._\……………………………..|…………..`=~-,….
…..`=~-,_\_……`\,……………………………\……………………
……………….`=~-,,.\,………………………….\…………………..
…………………………..`:,,………………………`\…………..__..
……………………………….`=-,……………….,%`>–==“…….
…………………………………._\……….._,-%…….`\……………
……………………………..,<`.._|_,-&“…………….`\…………..

Thanks for making it glaringly obvious that it was you IntLib.

Why don’t you tell us what information specifically is wrong? —

Ok sure thing chief.

– Gene Replacement was a glorious leader. –

Wrong.

–Gene Replacement, whom many know as Plastic Duck, was what made Voted 5 so popular and famous.–

Wrong.

–The scripts, items, and everything that streamed from him was a marvel to behold. –

True.

– Everything was always done with a fluid motion including keeping all of the SA goons in check. –

Wrong.

– There was no faggotry allowed in Satyr. The second you came up with the idea to type a 4chan catchphrase was the second you were swiftly kicked from the sim by Gene Replacement. That was, unless you were part of the in-crowd. –

Wrong.

– People like NiceAaron Thetan and Ben Kerensky were overly prominent, but I’m unsure if they made it into the clique that surrounded Gene. Being from the outside one doesn’t know all of the facts. –

True. You don’t.

– There was no mass grid griefing, and the leadership was firm on good solid “goon values”. –

Wrong.

– Satyr was a sim where you could hang out, talk with fellow goons, and fuck around all you wanted. –

True.

– The fall of Voted 5 was caused by many factors. I suspect, however, that many at the top knew it was coming. –

Wrong. It was really sudden, we had no idea it would happen. Most people that banned didn’t deserve it. (A few did.)

– Before Satyr underwent a “tiki theme” that led to in-fighting (no one wanted to do a serious theme that wasn’t mocking something) –

Wrong.

The tiki theme was only used because someone stole a bunch of World of Warcraft textures. No one wanted to build for it because it was a stupid idea. Had nothing to do with the ‘downfall’ of Voted 5.

– Gene Replacement didn’t go out without a fight though. Everyone knows he was awesome enough that even Linden Lab couldn’t stop him. –

True. He was pretty awesome.

– W-Hat was born again. However, it was born without the leadership that the others provided. –

Wrong.

– Soon, 4chan took over. –

WRONG.

– The w-hat I see now is nowhere near as cool as Voted 5. They may want to distance themselves as far away from Plastic Duck as they can, but that won’t change the fact that Plastic Duck is a better leader then they could ever be. –

Wrong. I would argue post voted-5 w-hat is more creative and clever than Voted 5 ever was in it’s heyday, (despite being in a little rut for the past couple of months). It’s also still basically made up of most of the same members.

I love Plastic Duck like some sort of eccentric weird uncle but he was a terrible leader of Voted 5. Awesome guy, terrible leader. The reason why everyone got banned was the result of his actions. Using goons shared to group objects and using them to crash the grid, (essentially making it appear like it was an innocent goon that did it) is not a good leadership example, nor is it based on “traditional goon values.”

He was pretty awesome at weeding out the idiots though.

– Plastic Duck could have ruined Second Life then and there. It could have been the end of the game. They could have kept the exploit secret and used it to send fake cash all over the grid with different accounts and IP addresses, exchanging those lindens for real world currency before Linden Lab could have noticed. They could have caused more damage than the grid crashing. They could have undermined the entire game and people’s trust into Linden Labs. –

He also could have gone to jail for fraud on a massive scale. Plus, he’s actually a really nice guy who just loves to get the goat of people and push their buttons. He knows the limits and the consequences of what he can do.

Thank you for your odd love affair letter with Gene Replacement. That was 2 years ago. Move on please. All the rest of us have. Aren’t the PN spamming a furry sex dungeon with tubgirl particles somewhere? that sounds like A-material for the “griefer herald”.

When did griefers start taking the internet so seriously, damn…