Comments on: W-HAT Goons Protest Supports Babyfur Rights in Second Life

By: Yep

Yep — Fri, 20 Aug 2010 20:35:44 +0000

“They seriously need phsycological help”

And lot of it.

By: H. Trevino

H. Trevino — Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:55:59 +0000

They seriously need phsycological help

By: Stahi Columbia

Stahi Columbia — Wed, 13 May 2009 14:32:34 +0000

Awww, my tail was off.

By: Neo Citizen

Neo Citizen — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:41:23 +0000

Unbelievable.

Simply stupifying.

Read from the top of this document. Every single idiot who posted in the comments missed the primary point, even though you repeated it in comment after comment. It’s not about the baby furs – it’s about the age verification. W-Hat, nor any other griefer group (Woodbury University) would fail hard if age verification kicked back in as a standard. When Linden Lab pulled it in late 2006, it was one of their more witless moves. Bringing it back would stop 70% of the griefing in one shot. If you had to age verify every time you made a new griefing avatar, it would slow the march of the griefer alts to a trickle.

Screw the baby furs, bring back age verification for EVERYBODY.

Wait, the screw the baby furs, part, forget I said that part. That’s disgusting. But you get the idea.

By: IMHO

IMHO — Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:59:25 +0000

If you go around telling everyone you’re a kid, then you do deserve to be reported for being a kid.

By: Robble Rubble

Robble Rubble — Sun, 19 Apr 2009 21:34:45 +0000

So lol I have this bridge that I want to sell you.

By: LOL

LOL — Sat, 18 Apr 2009 22:29:11 +0000

Regardless of age verification and how old you are IRL, Age playing a “Baby Fur” with a diper fetish is just wrong on so many levels. The second life game is domminated by sex and the sex industry, only the pedophiles think it is “OK” to have chracters with child-like features.

By: Satan

Satan — Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:32:26 +0000

Orion, you shouldn’t feel concerned for your safety except maybe in the sense that your obsession is harmful to yourself and others. I don’t recall making any threats but I suppose really anything can be a ‘threat’. ie “I’m going to go outside for a cigarette” OMG I just threatened to do something!!

You’re still missing the point that the debate had nothing to do with free speech at all but if you’d like to continue to debate it, how about you go back to THAT thread and do it there instead of in this one where it is irrelevant. I will gladly join you. Though convincing you of the truth is an act of futility since people tend to believe what they want to anyways, the act of making you look stupid to everyone else that is watching is both challenging and rewarding since it really requires me to explore the complexities of the human mind and articulate them (which interests me rather a lot).

On another note, I hereby declare this article win (since obviously W-HAT is NOT in actuality supporting babyfurs)

Also I agree with ‘holy shit’ in that it’s damn near impossible to tell if w-hat are serious furries or babyfurs as far as I see it.

By: Rabid Barkley

Rabid Barkley — Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:10:29 +0000

My innerfur is a giraffe and I scour the regions of furnation (the whole two I’m not banned from) looking for a baby moose to become my lover.

By: Silawx

Silawx — Sat, 18 Apr 2009 11:07:30 +0000

Oh no, it’s true. Most of us are HUGE furrys. For instance, my Fursona is a horseshoe crab. I mean, look at this:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8e/Xiphosura.jpg

How can you look at that smooth, curved shell and NOT be turned on? And it’s got ten legs. You know what that means?

Really great hugs :3