Comments on: Second Life Faction Wars: Woodbury “Raid” or JLU Drama-fest?

By: Mimika Oh

Mimika Oh — Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:33:53 +0000

No no not that, silly! I mean, when someone comes near to where you (and your friends) are, and their talking belly starts spamming chat with details of the development of their foetus. In that case they are trying to involve you in their role-playing. It is similar if someone comes to your sim and interrupts you because they want to role-play a superhero vigilante.

I think the problem with this role-play is that the superheroes need two more things: enemies, and victims. Since they all want to be heroes, they chose “griefers” as enemies, and everyone else as victims. But none of these people consented to be part of their game. This is a big problem for them. In order to play out their fantasy, they have to force these roles on others. That is anti-social behaviour.

By: Bubblesort Triskaidekaphobia

Bubblesort Triskaidekaphobia — Wed, 31 Mar 2010 01:34:28 +0000

@ Mimika: Your av was … involuntarily… impregnated?!? 0.o

What, did they put a follower script in a prim pregnancy belly or something? LOL

hmmm… that might be a fun toy, now that I think of it

MUHAHAHAHAHA!!!

By: Mimika Oh

Mimika Oh — Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:37:25 +0000

Being involuntarily involved in others role-playing, whether it’s talking pregnancy bellies or vigilante superheroes, is one of the most annoying aspects of Second Life. It’s just anti-social behaviour.

By: IntLibber Brautigan

IntLibber Brautigan — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:16:23 +0000

[2009-12-31 22:41:53] IM: Kalel Venkman: Valdez says “Tragic accident. Didn’t you hear?”
[2009-12-31 22:41:56] IM: Samantha Lowell: (brace yourselves, gang. Here it comes….)
[2009-12-31 22:42:00] IM: Kalel Venkman: “HIS PARROT CHUTE DIDN’T OPEN.”
[2009-12-31 22:42:08] IM: Samantha Lowell: ARGH!!!!!!
[2009-12-31 22:42:09] IM: Eugenia Burton groans.

See, documented proof that Kalel is the worst griefer of them all. lol.

By: Obvious Schism

Obvious Schism — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:14:48 +0000

Is this a particle article?

By: Kiddoh

Kiddoh — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:19:20 +0000

“LOL”

Oh dear, it would seem that I made Gen. go insane. :3

By: Gen.

Gen. — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:55:11 +0000

“But thank you for conceding victory to me anyways~<3 ^_~"

LOL

By: Kiddoh

Kiddoh — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:17:40 +0000

“Nah, still think you’re full of shit. Nice try tho.
Please, feel free to continue whining.”

Bahahahahaha! No need to be a sore loser, Gen.

But thank you for conceding victory to me anyways~<3 ^_~

By: Gen. Logic

Gen. Logic — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:05:54 +0000

“I like how your post has almost the polar opposite stance as the one before it.”

Nah, still think you’re full of shit. Nice try tho.

Please, feel free to continue whining.

By: Kiddoh

Kiddoh — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:13:00 +0000

“OH BUT THIS MUST MEAN LL LIEKS US AMIRITE?
Well, has LL EVER cared about what happens to sims and accounts, as long as the bills are paid?”

Doh~ sounds like someone’s jealous LL likes us more than they like you~. WU knows firsthand that LL cares about what happens to sims and accounts.

“Them having sold you a virtual e-lawn, doesnt mean they fullheartedly approve of you.”

Tizz met with them face to face to discuss the deal. It wasn’t your average “buy land from faceless linden” sorta of deal. Did you also know WU is also working with LL to fix crashing issues too?

“May I remind you that they have sold sims to babyfurs and dolcett’s groups as well?”

Did they even know what the sims were going to be used for when they sold them? WU let them know when they bought theirs. :>

“Oh there may be some goons opr /b/ tards among LL staff, but that doesnt mean anything. There’s furry Lindens as well, big FFing deal. Just means that there is someone you know to talk to first in case you want to bawwww about something.”

Yes, even Lindens themselves can’t be generalized. I like how your post has almost the polar opposite stance as the one before it.

“and the cute little disclaimer you have in the group charter for
Woodbury has but one function, trying to pass the responsibility to someone else.”

Yes, the responsibility goes to the one responsible, who would have thought?