<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did Linden Lab’s Emerald Dev Coverup Lead To Woodbury Ban?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alphavilleherald.com/2010/05/did-linden-lab%e2%80%99s-emerald-dev-coverup-lead-to-woodbury-ban.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2010/05/did-linden-lab%e2%80%99s-emerald-dev-coverup-lead-to-woodbury-ban.html</link>
	<description>Always Fairly Unbalanced</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2016 13:18:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kinoko</title>
		<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2010/05/did-linden-lab%e2%80%99s-emerald-dev-coverup-lead-to-woodbury-ban.html/comment-page-3#comment-67987</link>
		<dc:creator>Kinoko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 06:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphavilleherald.com/?p=3811#comment-67987</guid>
		<description>I know this is kinda really old post, but in my opinion Emerald was bad, and I am glad they are gone, although I am sure they are still around doing something... Lets get out our spy stuff smirks.

Anyways Yeah I highly do believe that Emerald Had reasons to get woodbury banned  from SL, as well as JLU getting woodbury banned for exposing their Brainiac Wiki, and I do not agree with any type of Data Mining, or resident Datamining within Second Life. What JLU, and Emerald together were doing were wrong. What Skills Hak/CDS does, and what ZF Redzone does making alts done I believe is wrong.

Today I found out that Kalel Venkman banned me from his SL Banlinks system, and why? Honestly I don&#039;t have no Idea, maybe it is because I Imed him pissed off once about how his Brainiac Wiki Was Leaked out to the public... That is right, all abuse reports went public and that made me really angry? So It appears Kalel Venkman, and his friends are allowed to Ban anyone from a massive Network Ban system called Phantom Zone, and abuse it. Yep thats right, I wonder what he really has on me anyways, I have been rumored to have done so many illegal things in SL, so what does he really have who knows for sure but him, and his friends. There is only one slight police group I may trust within SL, because they have been really nice, and are actually trying to protect residents of Second Life, at the same time as respond to residents, which was really helpful of them  helping to solve griefer problems. I honestly have no problem with Griefers getting network banned from sims, and anti grief devices, and Copybots. If a person is going to go and abuseively Copybot a bunch of creators, knowingly give away stolen content, or Grief the hell out of people then they have it comming. However if later they learn from their mistakes they deserve a chance. However this being said, a system like his that is possibly open to abuse without a person being able to view evidence, which they don&#039;t even know what they broke in The TOS/CS, or anything, or abuse for personal reasons, then there is a serious issue.

For example if I cussed out Kalel Venkman really bad in an IM, and he bans me from the system calling me a griefer for personal issues, just because he owns it there is serious issues, so for anyone wondering what phantom zone is, now you all know.

Although I do like some of the New mentor groups open in SL, and as long as they prove to me to be honest, support creators, and mentor our community, I will support and give back with many thanks and such. What I will not support though is any type of abuse of such rights, which I hope never occurs in SL  no matter who and what, and what I can sugguest in public to anyone even Kalel Venkman, or any other person using documenting griefer incidents, and such is that they give the user a chance to see what evidence they have against them, so for example they can register an account, and see any and all documents, or grief incidents on their accounts and such, not a dictatorship open to abuse, but a democracy and such. These reports would be kept private but the person could see why they are banned, and what trouble they are into etc.

And just so everyone knows I never Hate Emerald, or Kalel Venkman, or anyone else. I hate what they do, I hate what Skills Hak, and what ZFire does within SL, because I believe in privacy which is why I pushed  hard on all the public blogs to help push Emerald out.

The only question is when will LL actually make SL Fun again, and actually take care of this game and patch security holes, and the way people do these type of illegal things. The constant war between Griefers, Copybots, and Creators is all destroying our community I feel, but it is also dumb, and ignorant people who allow this to occur too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is kinda really old post, but in my opinion Emerald was bad, and I am glad they are gone, although I am sure they are still around doing something&#8230; Lets get out our spy stuff smirks.</p>
<p>Anyways Yeah I highly do believe that Emerald Had reasons to get woodbury banned  from SL, as well as JLU getting woodbury banned for exposing their Brainiac Wiki, and I do not agree with any type of Data Mining, or resident Datamining within Second Life. What JLU, and Emerald together were doing were wrong. What Skills Hak/CDS does, and what ZF Redzone does making alts done I believe is wrong.</p>
<p>Today I found out that Kalel Venkman banned me from his SL Banlinks system, and why? Honestly I don&#8217;t have no Idea, maybe it is because I Imed him pissed off once about how his Brainiac Wiki Was Leaked out to the public&#8230; That is right, all abuse reports went public and that made me really angry? So It appears Kalel Venkman, and his friends are allowed to Ban anyone from a massive Network Ban system called Phantom Zone, and abuse it. Yep thats right, I wonder what he really has on me anyways, I have been rumored to have done so many illegal things in SL, so what does he really have who knows for sure but him, and his friends. There is only one slight police group I may trust within SL, because they have been really nice, and are actually trying to protect residents of Second Life, at the same time as respond to residents, which was really helpful of them  helping to solve griefer problems. I honestly have no problem with Griefers getting network banned from sims, and anti grief devices, and Copybots. If a person is going to go and abuseively Copybot a bunch of creators, knowingly give away stolen content, or Grief the hell out of people then they have it comming. However if later they learn from their mistakes they deserve a chance. However this being said, a system like his that is possibly open to abuse without a person being able to view evidence, which they don&#8217;t even know what they broke in The TOS/CS, or anything, or abuse for personal reasons, then there is a serious issue.</p>
<p>For example if I cussed out Kalel Venkman really bad in an IM, and he bans me from the system calling me a griefer for personal issues, just because he owns it there is serious issues, so for anyone wondering what phantom zone is, now you all know.</p>
<p>Although I do like some of the New mentor groups open in SL, and as long as they prove to me to be honest, support creators, and mentor our community, I will support and give back with many thanks and such. What I will not support though is any type of abuse of such rights, which I hope never occurs in SL  no matter who and what, and what I can sugguest in public to anyone even Kalel Venkman, or any other person using documenting griefer incidents, and such is that they give the user a chance to see what evidence they have against them, so for example they can register an account, and see any and all documents, or grief incidents on their accounts and such, not a dictatorship open to abuse, but a democracy and such. These reports would be kept private but the person could see why they are banned, and what trouble they are into etc.</p>
<p>And just so everyone knows I never Hate Emerald, or Kalel Venkman, or anyone else. I hate what they do, I hate what Skills Hak, and what ZFire does within SL, because I believe in privacy which is why I pushed  hard on all the public blogs to help push Emerald out.</p>
<p>The only question is when will LL actually make SL Fun again, and actually take care of this game and patch security holes, and the way people do these type of illegal things. The constant war between Griefers, Copybots, and Creators is all destroying our community I feel, but it is also dumb, and ignorant people who allow this to occur too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emerald Viewer Scandal Erupts… Again &#171; Nalates&#39; Things &#38; Stuff Blog</title>
		<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2010/05/did-linden-lab%e2%80%99s-emerald-dev-coverup-lead-to-woodbury-ban.html/comment-page-3#comment-62873</link>
		<dc:creator>Emerald Viewer Scandal Erupts… Again &#171; Nalates&#39; Things &#38; Stuff Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 23:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphavilleherald.com/?p=3811#comment-62873</guid>
		<description>[...] Update 2010-08-21 &#8211; Many see the problem with Emerald as being some of the development team members. Alphaville Herald ran an article on just that issue in April 2010, Emerald Viewer: 76000 Unique Users Could Be Wrong. Another ran in May, Did Linden Lab’s Emerald Dev Coverup Lead To Woodbury Ban?. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update 2010-08-21 &#8211; Many see the problem with Emerald as being some of the development team members. Alphaville Herald ran an article on just that issue in April 2010, Emerald Viewer: 76000 Unique Users Could Be Wrong. Another ran in May, Did Linden Lab’s Emerald Dev Coverup Lead To Woodbury Ban?. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LordGregGreg Exits Emerald Viewer Team &#124; The Alphaville Herald</title>
		<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2010/05/did-linden-lab%e2%80%99s-emerald-dev-coverup-lead-to-woodbury-ban.html/comment-page-2#comment-62585</link>
		<dc:creator>LordGregGreg Exits Emerald Viewer Team &#124; The Alphaville Herald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 21:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphavilleherald.com/?p=3811#comment-62585</guid>
		<description>[...] drama has plagued the group &#8211; most recently the Emerald developers have been at the center of a series of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] drama has plagued the group &#8211; most recently the Emerald developers have been at the center of a series of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeffreyATW</title>
		<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2010/05/did-linden-lab%e2%80%99s-emerald-dev-coverup-lead-to-woodbury-ban.html/comment-page-2#comment-60558</link>
		<dc:creator>JeffreyATW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphavilleherald.com/?p=3811#comment-60558</guid>
		<description>@Kiddoh Even a small NDA violation is still an NDA violation, sadly. I contested it, but there were &quot;trust issues&quot; surrounding it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kiddoh Even a small NDA violation is still an NDA violation, sadly. I contested it, but there were &#8220;trust issues&#8221; surrounding it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiddoh</title>
		<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2010/05/did-linden-lab%e2%80%99s-emerald-dev-coverup-lead-to-woodbury-ban.html/comment-page-2#comment-60299</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiddoh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 02:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphavilleherald.com/?p=3811#comment-60299</guid>
		<description>@Jeffrey: Oh~ alright then. My-bad. Sorry about that something must have gotten lost in translation.

But then again. Why the hell would they fire you for stating the obvious?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jeffrey: Oh~ alright then. My-bad. Sorry about that something must have gotten lost in translation.</p>
<p>But then again. Why the hell would they fire you for stating the obvious?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeffreyATW</title>
		<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2010/05/did-linden-lab%e2%80%99s-emerald-dev-coverup-lead-to-woodbury-ban.html/comment-page-2#comment-60282</link>
		<dc:creator>JeffreyATW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 18:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphavilleherald.com/?p=3811#comment-60282</guid>
		<description>@Kiddoh I did no such thing. All I did was confirmed that they were banned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kiddoh I did no such thing. All I did was confirmed that they were banned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IntLibber Brautigan</title>
		<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2010/05/did-linden-lab%e2%80%99s-emerald-dev-coverup-lead-to-woodbury-ban.html/comment-page-2#comment-60255</link>
		<dc:creator>IntLibber Brautigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 02:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphavilleherald.com/?p=3811#comment-60255</guid>
		<description>So basically, Unfixable, you have your head jammed firmly up your ass, once again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So basically, Unfixable, you have your head jammed firmly up your ass, once again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiddoh</title>
		<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2010/05/did-linden-lab%e2%80%99s-emerald-dev-coverup-lead-to-woodbury-ban.html/comment-page-2#comment-60252</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiddoh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 01:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphavilleherald.com/?p=3811#comment-60252</guid>
		<description>@Unfixable: You&#039;re incorrect. Carl Linden confirmed WU was banned because of the Emerald Cover-up and he was fired for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Unfixable: You&#8217;re incorrect. Carl Linden confirmed WU was banned because of the Emerald Cover-up and he was fired for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It's Unfixable</title>
		<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2010/05/did-linden-lab%e2%80%99s-emerald-dev-coverup-lead-to-woodbury-ban.html/comment-page-2#comment-60249</link>
		<dc:creator>It's Unfixable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 22:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphavilleherald.com/?p=3811#comment-60249</guid>
		<description>So basically the answer to &quot;Did Linden Lab’s Emerald Dev Coverup Lead To Woodbury Ban?&quot; is a good solid &quot;no&quot;.  

So glad we had this little conversation and got the matter cleared up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So basically the answer to &#8220;Did Linden Lab’s Emerald Dev Coverup Lead To Woodbury Ban?&#8221; is a good solid &#8220;no&#8221;.  </p>
<p>So glad we had this little conversation and got the matter cleared up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: At0m0 Beerbaum</title>
		<link>http://alphavilleherald.com/2010/05/did-linden-lab%e2%80%99s-emerald-dev-coverup-lead-to-woodbury-ban.html/comment-page-2#comment-60226</link>
		<dc:creator>At0m0 Beerbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 07:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphavilleherald.com/?p=3811#comment-60226</guid>
		<description>@Intlibber

Hey blubbs, go back to making jizz puddles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Intlibber</p>
<p>Hey blubbs, go back to making jizz puddles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

