Comments on: Is One Song Making a Comeback in Second Life?

By: At0m0 Beerbaum

At0m0 Beerbaum — Sun, 30 May 2010 19:21:31 +0000

well only a furry would create a fictional law and name it after himself. as if he’s that important.

By: Gaara Sandalwood

Gaara Sandalwood — Fri, 28 May 2010 23:34:03 +0000

“Thus once again proving Unfixable’s Law.”

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Ah…………..

By: marilyn murphy

marilyn murphy — Fri, 28 May 2010 21:19:49 +0000

one song. heh. i wonder if its really you. curiousity makes me ask that you contact me with something i would know, that only you would know.
as to the rest of the responses to this story, who the hell are all you wierd people talking about ? pn and wu and such. one song was an original at least.

By: IntLibber Brautigan

IntLibber Brautigan — Fri, 28 May 2010 12:38:26 +0000

Lessee, Unfixable claims to be former PN and a furry, so he’s possibly either Windowlic (Yaranaika) or JWAN, tho there were so many closeted furry’s and furry spais in the PN, using the group to grief other furry’s they had a bone to pick with, or to build public sympathy for furrys. He might also be Thomas, tho this idiot doesn’t sound like Thomas, or Jag Talaj… Then again, Angel was in the PN also… So was Carigorp.

Whoever it is, the amount to which he is incessantly posting here about one topic alone displays a degree of obsession and compulsion that belies his claims, not only about just ‘trolling’ but claims to sanity.

By: masa

masa — Fri, 28 May 2010 04:06:11 +0000

dear one song,

we miss you

love,
w-hat

By: Zeta Weather

Zeta Weather — Thu, 27 May 2010 14:27:44 +0000

Second Life is a game. Woodbury was different because it didn’t buy into the suburban fantasy simulator Web 3.0 marketing hogwash like the rest of you.

“The reason any of these groups thrive at all is because they have talented people in them who can provide creative or technical resources to make them work.”

laughingelfman.jpg

You mean a bunch of autistic furries standing around trying to make Cory Ondrejka’s broken scripting language work? You make it sound like something worth putting on a resume.

By: Kiddoh

Kiddoh — Thu, 27 May 2010 14:26:33 +0000

So defending something = RAGE?

Show me this rage of mine if you please. I’m going to laugh if there’s not even a single swear in any of them.

Also you need to fix the definition of your law.

It’s more accurate to put:

“If an article has nothing to do with Woodbury, It’s Unfixable will make it about Woodbury and then he will proceed to complain about how it’s suddenly about Woodbury a couple posts later- whether the article has suddenly become about Woodbury or not.”

By: Selene Putzo

Selene Putzo — Thu, 27 May 2010 14:26:29 +0000

@ Unfixable:. Quote, “I was PN and drifted through WU on my way to sanity.”

Please provide certified medical evidence to prove the latter part of your statement.

also… Unfixable:. Quote “Why continue on the topic? BECAUSE EVERY POST ON THIS STUPID RAG IS ABOUT YOU IDIOTS IN THE FIRST PLACE.

You want the pain to stop? GO AWAY.”

You were the first person to mention WU in this thread and then you scream every thread is about WU? Excuse me – do what you’ve just suggested to us – just go away.

PS – I dont remember you in PN unless you were one of those wannabees who turned into neverbees because they always were bl00dy-well-shouln’t-bees… I guess that’s why you failed at staying in WU too.

By: It's Unfixable

It's Unfixable — Thu, 27 May 2010 13:49:31 +0000

Oh, and Kiddoh? I got you raging for an entire pageful of comments on an article which has absolutely nothing to do with Woodbury.

Thus once again proving Unfixable’s Law.

And I even told you up front you were being trolled, and you still went for it.

By: It's Unfixable

It's Unfixable — Thu, 27 May 2010 13:47:42 +0000

I was PN and drifted through WU on my way to sanity. But I’ll tell you this – now that I’ve seen things from both sides, WU had absolutely nothing going for it that every other group of any size at all doesn’t have. The reason any of these groups thrive at all is because they have talented people in them who can provide creative or technical resources to make them work.

Woodbury, however, had almost nobody of noteworthy talent. Tayste has chops. Silent Hush could script and paint both, and shouldn’t have been banned. Merato was a copybotter and got caught and banned not once, but twice now. Tizzy’s builds were technically adequate but that’s it.

“But I cud use Fotoshops” is pretty thin as a justification for all the rest of the crap. I’m not proud of what we did in the PN, but at least I woke the fuck up. You guys just sat on the bomb and rode it all the way down.