Humans against the Bible KJV do not know the Bible being taught hurtful lies by the established religions. I know the loving Truth,and that truth is in the heart of the furry,and zoo,and the pedofiles too.

I was referring to the fact that if you type “s3x” more than twice, your comment won’t be posted and you’ll be given a cryptic error message about PHP settings.

Peace is always an option but it is often not a practical or productive one. Just sitting there in your peaceful meditative state is a bad decision when getting the shit beat out of you. You are justified to fight back, both legally and morally, to preserve your life, as you should.

I do not believe that this article was a “mockery” of Christianity, or any religion for that matter. In fact, it wasn’t even an argument against Christianity. It is easy (and completely valid) to make a mockery of Christianity for the purpose of disproving it, but this article does neither.

“The internet is serious business.” ~ Anonymous

It would seem that maybe defensive nature deterrs the mind from the original context and meaning which was clearly and precisely expressed within my post to which you replied.

Thusly, I reiterate without ill intent:

1. Peace is always an option, regardless of circumstances. Expounded: Inner-peace is the self-willed ability to live outside of the influence which others might tryingly inflict upon you without your consent. This is you and everyone elses choice.

2. I am personally unbiased to the religious aspects of this post. I have no animosity towards ‘Furries’ either.

3. My main intent and concern was to offer the following advice: It is senseless to render justification to an issue in the form of a perverted form of evidence (mocking christianity as it is documented). Making mockery of anothers belief is only lowering to the same standard and thus you effectively assume the social image of a likened offense. If the goal is to paint a positive image for your cause and edify the public it is highly unlikely you will achieve this via negative enforcement.

4. In the end, we must remember SL is only a game and everyone connected to it is another human being, regardless of whether they are a douchebag or not,

Wish you luck in your endeavors.
Peace,
Enix

Man, I sure do love this spam filter.

Peace is not an option for some of the furries that have been constantly harassed and threatened. I’ve been fortunate enough to usually evade the insecure, lifeless idiots that perpetrate that sort of behavior. Haters gonna hate, sure, but when it gets to the point of death threats and the like, it’s impractical to sit there and take it.

However, I disagree. I do not know of many furries that persecute non-furries on the basis that they are simply not furries. I know that most furries will take a defensive stance against those who insult and belittle them, but the haters are the aggressors in these situations. You do not see a grassroots movement among furries to “exterminate the human scum”.

Now, that being said, let me pontificate on the article. I do not personally believe that the Bible, or any other religious text, is the inerrant word of any god, nor do I believe in a god myself. However, it is difficult to “justify” the furry fandom in a religious context because, frankly, there were no furries when such texts were written and the authors did not think of including such rules. There are rules against besti@lity (which are quite clear). There are rules against hom0s3xuality (which are, for the most part, generally ignored except by fringe groups such as the WBC). However, there are also rules against s0domy, which virtually nobody follows. (S0domy includes oral s3x, along with anal s3x. Hence, bl0wjobs are forbidden according to the Bible.) There are rules against so many other things that have been accepted by society (mixed fabrics in clothing is a popular one) that the validity of these other rules have been called into question. Nonetheless, even if one were to follow these rules to the letter, the persecution towards furries is in itself against the Bible, as explained in the article. Let he who has not sinned cast the first stone, or something like that.

In any case, a very large percent of internet users are atheist or at least questioning the religion they were brainwashed with as a child, so I’m not sure quoting Bible passages to argue one’s point is effective.

Hallucinogens…

@ OP: People are all free to believe what they want to believe… but on the grounds of natural social law: Why would you purposely make a mockery of another groups (christians) beliefs in the pursuit of justifying your own?

Alot of furries make such ridiculous statements on a daily basis, speaking of such things as oppression and being misunderstood. Does becoming equally as oppressive in moral stance make you better or the same as your aggressors? The answer is: Furries who harbor and act upon their animosity are no better than the scum they speak against.

I’m not biased to this subject, however, this is definitely an uneeded abstract cry for attention.

If you wish to maintain a good balance in your mental state and karma, you should seriously consider practicing a concept known as “Peace”.

I lol’d. Cool, a fictional character hates me.

God hates furfags, for over 2500 years. Thats a lot of hate.

Oh, we’re quoting irrelevant biblical laws that don’t apply anymore, are we? Hope you’re wearing clothes that are made out of 100% cotton.

Interestingly enough, the U.S. Supreme Court is going through hearings on whether this kind of activity is covered under the First Amendment.

Protip: it’s not. Most states have laws against words that provoke an immediate violent reaction. That’s why if you go up to some gay guy and yell “BURN IN HELL YOU FAGGOT SCUM” and they sock you, but you never touch them, you’re both going to jail, despite your right to free speech. But the problem is WBC keeps touting their free speech “right” while the government is between a rock and a hard place on both their free speech “rights” and the role of the government in religion (since many claim if the WBC is “censored”, the government will be persecuting their faith-based intolerance and thus will be getting involved in religion). It will be interesting, though, to see how the case turns out.