Comments on: Fascination — Post 6 Grrrrl

By: Marianne

Marianne — Sun, 03 Jul 2011 15:03:05 +0000

I really like the third picture. Fantastic pose, good light and post-processing work.
Too much makeup… tsk. Didn’t you find any other faults, then she did a good work on her avatar.

By: Persephone Bolero

Persephone Bolero — Sat, 25 Jun 2011 14:53:45 +0000

@Nelson Don’t the hoofs count for something? I think you’re underestimating her furriness.

By: Obvious Schism

Obvious Schism — Sat, 25 Jun 2011 06:25:49 +0000

@ James Freud

They key concept here is user generated content.

LL gets all its customers to create stuff and hence build the SL environment for them.

Similarly, the Herald gets all its readers to write lots of comments and hence do the writing for them.

Just as I am doing now.

By: Nelson Jenkins

Nelson Jenkins — Fri, 24 Jun 2011 19:47:21 +0000

@ IntLibber

Around a 1. Antlers =/= furry. Sort of like how neko ears and a tail =/= furry but they still rate around a 4-5 on the furry scale.

By: Yep

Yep — Fri, 24 Jun 2011 19:29:06 +0000

ooh Go getem Tiger

By: IntLibber

IntLibber — Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:39:43 +0000

So, where does this avie fall on the test of furry/not-furry?

By: Lili

Lili — Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:23:54 +0000

Bambi ??

By: Nelson Jenkins

Nelson Jenkins — Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:24:45 +0000

@ GG3

The only dick here is the one that censors his own posts.

By: Emperor Norton hears a who?

Emperor Norton hears a who? — Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:52:09 +0000

All the Emperor is willing to say is the Doe girl would look good mounted in my room.

By: GG3

GG3 — Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:20:32 +0000

@faraden
One with a hidden d1ck of course m’dear!