AgePlay Slut Asks, “Where Da Tweeners At?”
by Pixeleen Mistral on 22/12/06 at 9:42 am
by Heartun Breaker, syndicated advice columnist.
HEY HEARTUN~ As a 43 year old woman who came to Second Life to explore AgePlay as the slutty kid I wasn’t in real life, I am perplexed by the LACK of people into this kind of scenario… I’d have expected dozens of people exploring this kind of fantasy. Do you think SL AgePlayers are self-censoring? ~ SLUTKID ALONE
DEAR SLUTKID~ I asked a forum of AgePlayers if they self-censored and met with laughter 
and comments like “that’s a stupid question,” “isn’t it obvious?” and “we are an oppressed peoples, about as hated as Furries.” What kind of self-censoring? For starters many AgePlayers routinely change their avatars from the one they prefer to a ‘safer’ (read ‘older’) one when they leave AgePlay-specific sims. They also swap out that title “Daddy” or “Baby Doll” for something unrelated to their true SL identity. Simple griefing? I am told it goes far beyond that.
- “With the televised witch hunts of real predators… even though we are adults and play with adults, and are protected by the TOS (SL Terms of Service) we are constantly questioned by ‘Holy Rollers’ who want to play moral police,” said one AgePlayer who requested anonymity to avoid being singled out for griefing. “They ask things like ‘What if one of you was a real kid?’ but that’s stupid. I’ve seen underage kids sneaking on the grid and none of them use a ‘kid’ avatar. They’re all seven foot tall, muscled men with lots of guns or bimbos with huge boobies and they crawl the ‘free sex’ areas or just hang out in some normal sim.”
The AgePlayers I spoke to concede that it is possible, however unlikely, that a child could impersonate a legitimate AgePlayer (see “AgePlay Fun and Games Turn Ugly,” Get A Life, Dec. 13, 2006) but they insist that the vast majority of all AgePlayers would do what any adult would and should do once the age of their lover is discovered. And they are quick to add that they believe this scenario happens most often among non-AgePlayers.
- “Most of the AgePlay community has zero tolerance for actual underage people playing,” said another AgePlayer who asked for his name to be omitted for fear of griefing. “A real life child posing as an AgePlayer would be reported (to the Lindens). And lets not forget that real life parents do have some responsibility to keep up with what their kids do on the household computer. Second Life is not meant for kids. Well, real kids anyway.”
So, Dear Slutkid, the answer to your complicated question is that AgePlayers do try to keep a very low profile. But the AgePlayers I talked with had many encouraging words for you regarding the prospects of your finding a compatible partner who likes the kind of role play you like. In that pursuit, like any relationship, you just have to keep looking until the right person comes along. ~ HEARTUN BREAKER
Sandbox Play Sucks When He’s Drunk
HEY HEARTUN~ I’m a 19 year old college student, studying video game programming. There’s this guy (in Second Life) who hangs out with me when we build in the sandbox, I’ll call him Jibberjab (not his real name) and he’s real cool but when he gets drunk in real life he talks all kind of shit at me, like what he would say to a whore or something. Do I gotta take the jerk with the pal? ~ BUILDER GAL
DEAR BUILDER: Ah, the ole “insufferable drunk” scenario. The kind of behavior that inspired author Robert Louis Stevenson to write the classic ‘Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.’ Highlighted in Jibberjab’s behavior is the duality of human nature. Jekyll says that “man is not truly one, but truly two,” and he envisions the human soul as a battleground for an ‘angel’ and a ‘fiend,’ each trying to dominate the other. Stephenson was breathing life into the then new-fangled theory developed by Freud that the human mind was subdivided into contrasting and conflicting parts — unlike the ‘Monadology’ theory of Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, which had long held sway.
At the end of Dr. Jekyll and Mr Hyde the Hyde personality all but obliterated the good Dr. Jekyll. It is that way with drunks too. Fortunately, in Second Life you can take the good and not the bad. You can mute Jibberjab when he is drunk and abusive, then unmute him later. Just be quick to mute him again when he next hits the sauce.~ HEARTUN BREAKER
Love My Babe, Love Her Best Friend MORE!!
HEY HEARTUN: I’m in love with my online partners new best friend and its driving me nuts! She’s so perfect, but I would be such an asshole to try to do anything, and I know it! ~ RISKY BUSINESS
DEAR RISKY: Why are you writing me? You already know what you’re going to do — so go ahead and do it! That forbidden fruit is irresistible for many people, and it sounds like you fit the bill. At least have the decency to ditch your partner BEFORE you pursue her friend and tear them apart. I just don’t get what it is with you cheating hearts. ~ HEARTUN BREAKER
—
Get A Life is the most popular and widely syndicated advice column in Second Life — known for Heartun Breaker’s down to earth common sense and witty reason.
If you have a question for Get A Life just IM it to Heartun Breaker. Or send e-mail here: HeartunBreaker@hotmail.com. All submissions become the property of the Heartun Breaker. We reserve the right to edit submissions for brevity and clarity. No ‘real’ SL names will be published. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Heartun Breaker, except that an individual may download and/ or forward articles via e-mail to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Heartun Breaker
Dec 22nd, 2006
If you have a question for “Get a Life” just email HeartunBreaker@gmail.com. All submissions become the property of HeartunBreaker.com. We reserve the right to edit submissions for brevity and clarity. No ‘real’ or ‘game’ names will be published. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Heartun Breaker, except that an individual may download and/ or forward articles via e-mail to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
King Frederick
Dec 23rd, 2006
Amazing how you are a “holy roller” if you find pornographic images depicting children being raped disgusting.
Just a thought
Dec 23rd, 2006
Amazing that someone who constantly uses “King” as part of his name makes this same complaint. go read a history book.
(Note: In no way do I condone the practice of Age Play being done in a Public Venue – keep it where others do not see it and you won’t be targeted by these people.)
Ouchquack
Dec 23rd, 2006
Hey, I can see that it is role play too… even though, personally, it makes me a little twitchy… and King is out of line… but (and I ask this without rancor) if AgePlay is simply ‘role play’ why should it be kept to non-public venues?
I’m not talking about sex between AgePlayers… I mean, just being in their juvenile avies and maybe flirting and such. Grosses me out, but should it be relegated to private sims?
I really don’t know the answer either. I mean, I’m SUCH a backer of the 1st Ammendment that so long as no one is being hurt or infringing on the rights of others.. this should all be ok. Then again, like many, it kinda grosses me out. And although I trust that the vast majority of AgePlayers really are just goofing around in a way they like and would get upset to find out their partner was really a kid… part of me worries about my RL kid.
I’m totally conflicted on this one. And I know that, at least with my kid, there’s no way she’d come on here acting as a kid. If I allowed her (I wont!) she’d pretend to be much older than she is. I think most tweens, teens and such would be like that. But I’m still twitchy about AgePlay.
humanoid
Dec 23rd, 2006
My mental capacity is sufficient to realize age players aren’t real children. This doesn’t seem to be the case with many SL players. And newbs with orbiting weapons they found in a freebies pile grief me a lot more than 40-something women in Little Red Riding Hood outfits.
King Frederick
Dec 23rd, 2006
Yes, I use the word “King” for my first name — I know that in your skewed worldview that must be gastly. But then in your view apparently its okay for people to engage in child-rape fantasies, so diff’rent strokes for diff’rent folks.
“Go read a history book” is also a marvelous substitute for an actual argument.
“In no way do I condone the practice of Age Play being done in a Public Venue”
Yes, because it’s so perfectly okay it must be hidden from society lest the people who see it be completely disgusted and the people who do it be completely ashamed of themselves.
“I’m SUCH a backer of the 1st Ammendment that so long as no one is being hurt or infringing on the rights of others.. this should all be ok.”
Let’s say I’m a racist. I create an island called “KILL ALL N-WORDS ISLAND” and me and about 500 of my friends put up artistic images of black people being hanged, murdered, and raped. We play games where some of us dress up like black people and we run them down and lynch them.
And of course we hide behind the “It’s all just a fantasy, stop being such a mundane holly roller if you don’t like it than don’t come around us.”
Think the Lindens will go for that?
Just a thought
Dec 24th, 2006
Fred, either go brush up on your history and put your moral bullshit aside or shut up, got it?
Your kind is all about persecuting others based on images sen in the media, where I actually hive people the benefit of the doubt. don’t like a group? Then stay away from them.
don’t like their presence in Second Life? Leave. None of the current groups are going anywhere because gasp they stay within the law, unlike some people.
But you know? I think I’ll save you the boring and mundane task of actually reading anything not related to your own personal agenda.
since you’d like to be called a ‘King’ in your second Life experience then it would make sense to know a bit about that time period, in particular the fact that by the age of fourteen many were already married and being bedded. This was not due to a lack of morals but an innate understanding that the Human race had to survive at that time. How does this relate?
don’t play the part if you have a problem with the practices of the era …. or with the overwhelming fact that in this day and age, more people are aware, active, and far more mature at that same age than you think.
Not to mention that from what I’ve seen (which has not been very much mind you) there’s a distinct problem with your little rant: The Age Players I have seen have all been within the range of fourteen to sixteen years old. Well within the legal age limits in several countries (and my own home state).
Any further response from you in any attempt to defend your position (which is on a very steep slope as it is ‘king’ fred) will simply result in a bought of laughter on my end along with wondering how anyone like you could have ever survived to this point.
Bad day to you.
Just a thought
Dec 24th, 2006
Oh, and next time? try not to confuse ANY role Player (no matter what they play) with something like racisim – not the same.
dmx
Dec 24th, 2006
Could people at least be honest and call it “paedophilia role play” rather than “age play”?
Just a thought
Dec 24th, 2006
Hmmm, saying that would give credence to the assumption that all of the Age Players out there have sex using their characters – not all of them do.
King Frederick
Dec 24th, 2006
“Fred, either go brush up on your history and put your moral bullshit aside or shut up, got it?”
You keep appealing to ‘history,’ but who knows what you’re trying to argue. People who don’t *get* child-rape just don’t *get* history.
“our kind is all about persecuting others based on images sen in the media”
NAMBLA talking-point #42-j3
“don’t like a group? Then stay away from them.”
Don’t like our racism-roleplay? Than stay away from our group! Of course, the Lindens will ban people for racist images, even in jest, but they won’t crack down on the section of the ‘ageplay’ community that likes to arouse themselves by sexualizing children.
“None of the current groups are going anywhere because gasp they stay within the law”
The KKK stays within the law too. Would you be okay with the KKK creating a scenario like I described? Well, I can tell you the Lindens wouldn’t. And I don’t have a problem with that. I just wish they would extend it to pedophile ageplayers.
“I think I’ll save you the boring and mundane task of actually reading anything not related to your own personal agenda”
Yeah blah blah blah Socrates was a pederast, he also believed in slavery and the inferiority of certain races, is that okay too? But who knows if you were even going to argue that. You never do anything except wave “history” around like I’m supposed to be impressed.
“you’d like to be called a ‘King’ in your second Life experience”
As a joke.
“it would make sense to know a bit about that time period”
What the fuck are you talking about? There’s no “time period” for kings. There are Kings alive today. There have been “kings” for most of human history. Too much fantasizing about raping preteens, not enough history class.
“the fact that by the age of fourteen many were already married and being bedded”
Yes, because until recent history at 13 and 14 years old a person generally had received all the education that they could receive and were ready to settle down and have a family because the life expectancy (in certain periods of history) was 40-50 years old.
But we don’t live in the 8th century, we live in the 21st century, in the west, where 13 year olds are supposed to be finishing their education and are far, far from maturation. Not diddling some fat old man or woman who gets his jollies off of adolescents.
But even if we were to allow 13 and 14 year olds that does not explain the ageplay that involves children that are well below the age of puberty.
“don’t play the part if you have a problem with the practices of the era”
Translation: Hello, I’m a moron and I think ‘kings’ are era-specific.
“in this day and age, more people are aware, active, and far more mature at that same age than you think”
I’m sure that cheap rationalization gets you through the night when you’re masturbating to your avatar plowing an 8 year old boy.
“The Age Players I have seen have all been within the range of fourteen to sixteen years old. ”
That’s nice, from what I’ve seen “ageplayers” are often dressed as prepubescent children. And often sexually servicing “adult” avatars.
But don’t you dare judge them, after all, it has historical precedent… so does cannibalism, slavery, racism, and sexism, but I digress!
“will simply result in a bought of laughter”
Yes, being on the internet I am completely unfamilliar with people feining ‘laughter’ and saying that their opponent’s argument is ‘hilarious’… especially after giving only tenuous, ill-informed, idiotic pseudo-arguments for their position.
See, look, I can do it too:
“Your Position, LMAO!!!! YOU THINK THAT? ROFTL!!”
Instead of blowing all your money on avatars with hairless vaginas, why don’t you join a community college?
King Frederick
Dec 24th, 2006
“Hmmm, saying that would give credence to the assumption that all of the Age Players out there have sex using their characters – not all of them do”
Yes, for the record, though I’m using the term “ageplayer” I’m not referring to people who just like to play in child avatars, I’m talking about people who get off on child avatars having sex — aka child pornography.
Just a thought
Dec 24th, 2006
Fred, you’ve just proven to me that you’d rather make baseless assumptions rather than actually use the brain that god gave you.
When you can respond to a post without assuming the person behind the keyboard is into what you’re so hellbent on arguing against, maybe people will take you a bit more seriously: until then, you’re nobody and nothing.
Let us go back to my first response shall we?
“(Note: In no way do I condone the practice of Age Play being done in a Public Venue – keep it where others do not see it and you won’t be targeted by these people.)”
What does this mean? It means I am not an age Player myself – if you had anything within that skull of yours, you’d have figured that out.
Next, your witless attempts to dodge the point:
I have seen the build you have created Fred – it is a Medieval Castle. That is the time period your character hails from. The point having been that if you don’t like the practices of that era, don’t play a character of that era.
As for the rest of your response? Nothing at all to do with mine – especially telling me to go join a community college, sorry – went to one already and discovered that it’s a waste of my time: Not near enough challenge – just like you Freddy boy.
If you can manage to post something worth reading – since now I have seen the limits of your supposed intellect – perhaps I’ll think about responding, or even giving you a cookie (yes, you’re little more than a petulant child for making references to racism. The current issue to which I am responding has nothing to do with it, so you attempting to liken it to such is a pathetic and sad excuse for an argument. Racists? I’m all for taking them outside and disemboweling them – just like you Freddy boy)!
Isn’t there anyone in Second Life or posting on the related web pages that actually thinks?
Just a thought
Dec 24th, 2006
“Yes, for the record, though I’m using the term “ageplayer” I’m not referring to people who just like to play in child avatars, I’m talking about people who get off on child avatars having sex — aka child pornography.”
Then use a different term, hmm? Or is it not within your mental capacity to figure out that the response you have been given is due to your ill use of an RP grouping’s title?
Probably not.
King Frederick
Dec 24th, 2006
“What does this mean? It means I am not an age Player myself ”
Oh, okay, you’re just a pedophile apologist, that’s LOADS better.
“Next, your witless attempts to dodge the point: I have seen the build you have created Fred – it is a Medieval Castle.”
You must have seen it in a coked out hallucination because I don’t have a “medieval castle” build. And even if I did, that wouldn’t mean that I’m trying ot recreate anything historical, it could be purely fantasy. But in this case, it’s your fantasy, because no such “medieval castle” build exists.
“especially telling me to go join a community college, sorry – went to one already and discovered that it’s a waste of my time”
Much better to spend time dressing like a yak on a videogame platform.
“If you can manage to post something worth reading”
This is mighty rich. The only argument you’ve offered thus far is “Well, look at history,” and I chewed that up and spat it back in your face. I guess you think that if you swagger enough and insult my ‘intellect’ enough you’ll look like you came out on top.
As a pedophile apologist, you are very good at rationalizing things to yourself.
“Racists? I’m all for taking them outside and disemboweling them”
Oh, how noble. Hate a minority? I HATE YOU! Sexually penetrate a child? Let’s be friends
Hurrrr
“Isn’t there anyone in Second Life or posting on the related web pages that actually thinks?”
You wouldn’t recognize a coherent line of thought if it dressed up like little red riding hood and teleported you back to its skycabin for sex.
“Then use a different term”
Since the article has already provided the context, and I’ve already clarified the context, no.
Just a thought
Dec 24th, 2006
Freddy boy – you’re just proving more and more that you don’t even think before you post. if you cannot cease making your little baseless assumptions, then perhaps you need to go home and play with your little group of bigot friends hmm?
I defend groups that are persecuted based on a mistaken vision perpetuated by little maggots like you: and yes Freddy boy, you do have a Medieval Castle build – the design of the castle cannot be compared to anything modern at all, despite your having put up a classified (not sure if it’s still up) looking for some club DJ and having it teleport people to your little build.
As for the rest, thank you for once again proving you are not as intelligent as you’d like everyone to think you are, by all means keep responding to me: Just remember that I can tell if someone actually stops to think about what they’re about to say – and clearly you do not, otherwise you’d not be foolish enough to think I’m defending pedophiles – I’m not, and my responses have nothing to do with that minor group of Age Players: They do however have everything to do with your bigoted attmpt to lump all the members of a group in as one bad egg.
Christ, I don’t know which is worse: The fact that you so blatantly lump people together like that or the fact that you’re too blind and too arrogant to admit that not everything is as you think it is, and that you’ve provoked the very response you’re getting.
Prove that you’re not some rednecked bigot that is incapable of seeing the difference between members of a group and I’ll let this one go.
Prove that you can tell the difference between an Age Player (which incidentally is not portrayed in this article – dependent on the age of the character in question) and a real Pedophile.
Artemis Fate
Dec 24th, 2006
I wonder if it’s possible to mention the word “age-player” without erupting into a big angry debate.
Just a thought
Dec 24th, 2006
Not if the people using it are going to lump all of the differing variants into one group and label it all bad Art.
Artemis Fate
Dec 24th, 2006
“Not if the people using it are going to lump all of the differing variants into one group and label it all bad Art.”
Seems like the original post from Heartun portrayed ageplayers positively/objectively.
Just a thought
Dec 24th, 2006
Wasn’t talking about heartun Arty.
King Frederick
Dec 24th, 2006
Okay, let’s see where we are so far, with “Just a thought” the Pedophile apologist:
1. He makes a shitty argument from history, I rebut it, he drops it entirely.
2. He says that because I use the title “King” that I have to give credence to pedophilia because — get this — in some cultures in some times kings reigned over civilizations where pedophilia was present. I point out that kings have ruled over civilizations with slavery, racism, jingoism, cannibalism, etc. And he drops this point entirely.
3. He continues to make the claim that I have a castle build — not only that, but I have a classified out! Where is this castle build? Where is this classified? And why would should this mean anything even if it wasn’t just the blathering imagination of a pedophile apologist? Who knows! Welcome to “Just a thought” land, a roleplaying realm for people who live in fantasy dimensions where logical thought does not apply!
“You’re just proving more and more that you don’t even think before you post”
You post this without any sense of irony at all.
“I defend groups that are persecuted based on a mistaken vision perpetuated by little maggots like you”
Persecuted Groups = Pedophiles
“Maggots” = People who think child pornography is disgusting
Do you do this in public, “Just a thought”? Do your co-workers and family members know that you defend child pornographers on the Internet? Or are you only shining Sir-Lancelot of the Ageplay Table Online?
“you do have a Medieval Castle build – the design of the castle cannot be compared to anything modern at all, despite your having put up a classified”
You’re such a moron. Not only do I not have a castle, I don’t even own land to put it on! Pedophiles, despair, your apologist is a moron who can’t even do cursory research before making unfounded accusations. Oh what a friend we have in the ironically named “Just a thought”
“looking for some club DJ and having it teleport people to your little build”
Hahahahaha, so please, tell me where my land is? Tell me where this “castle” is and what my “build” is? The only place I hang out is in Baku, not in whatever drug-induced hallucinatory version of Second Life you’ve been playing.
“by all means keep responding to me”
It’s just too funny. You don’t have anything substantial. You claim shit that doesn’t exist (my mysterious magical castle where I host DJ-driven raves, apparently), you make bullshit, fallacious arguments using ‘history,’ you have shitty logic (“You’re a king, all kings reigned over pedophiles)… and yet you keep attacking *my* intelligence.
By all means, hammer away, you’re making the ageplay community look fantastic.
“he fact that you so blatantly lump people together like ”
like ‘Kings’?
“you’re too blind and too arrogant to admit that not everything is as you think it is”
Yeah, because ‘Child pornography is disgusting and wrong’ really amounts to ‘everything is as I think it is.’
Shouldn’t you be watching the wikipedia entry for “NAMBLA” to make sure no one switches ‘boy lover’ to ‘pedophile’?
“you’d not be foolish enough to think I’m defending pedophiles – I’m not, and my responses have nothing to do with that minor group of Age Players”
If you’re not defending pedophiles, Dummy, then why did you respond to my first post ATTACKING PEDOPHILES and not ageplayers in general?
Does it HURT to backpedal that fast? Are you burning off the holiday calories?
“Prove that you’re not some rednecked bigot ”
This is rich – you bitch about people ‘lumping everyone together’ and then you use the term ‘redneck,’ as if all ‘rednecks’ are bigots, and as if a strong distaste for child pornography means I must be caucasion.
“I’ll let this one go”
Oh, golly, no, black knight, armless and defenseless, please, keep on charging bravely into battle.
Artemis Fate
Dec 24th, 2006
“Wasn’t talking about heartun Arty.”
I was, since it was her original post that sparked a long angry debate. Hence the word “age-player” was mentioned, even in a fairly positive context and still managed to spark a long angry debate.
Just a thought
Dec 24th, 2006
Freddy boy – apparently you’ve lost track of the responses, and apparently you don’t have a good memory – of course I could be confusing you for another pretentious bigot that has a castle Build and refers to himself as a King.
Do yourself a favor – stop posting. Here is your first comment to this article:
“Amazing how you are a “holy roller” if you find pornographic images depicting children being raped disgusting.”
which, when put into context with everything else that follows, shows you associate Age Play with child Pornography, just as the rather deluded author of this article, and the person writing to said author, has done.
with that said, kindly get over yourself: You’ve done nothing more than rate yourself up with Prok ….. attempting to change what you have said, attempting to put words where there are none, and labeling others based on your own deluded notion of what is being said.
So sorry to have to point out to you what you (probably unknowingly) opened yourself up to.
Now if you’re done attempting to be intelligent, I do have a few things to do – so kindly admit that your initial comment was aimed at Age Players (as the title of this article suggests) or admit that you made a mistake in not making it clear from the onset.
King Frederick
Dec 24th, 2006
Why do you continue to argue, black knight?
—
“”Amazing how you are a “holy roller” if you find pornographic images depicting children being raped disgusting.”
which, when put into context with everything else that follows, shows you associate Age Play with child Pornography,”"
—
Did you not read the article?
ARTICLE: ““They ask things like ‘What if one of you was a real kid?’ but that’s stupid. I’ve seen underage kids sneaking on the grid”
If no sexual pederasty/pedophilia is involved, then why does it matter if the other avatar is a real kid or not? That’s what I was commenting on, sport.
I was commenting on the article and the person invovled in the article who admittedly engages in child pornography using second life avatars.
You swagger in and make a justification for child/pederast pornography using historical merit — but you’re not defending child pornography, right?
Now you’re backpedaling at the speed of light. I notice you dropped your fanficul accusation that I own a “castle” somewhere.
“”….. attempting to change what you have said, attempting to put words where there are none”"
Here’s a recap of all the points you abandoned, much of it through backpedaling:
1. You made a shitty argument from history, I rebut it, you drop it entirely.
2. You say that because I use the title “King” that I have to give credence to pedophilia because in some cultures in some times kings reigned over civilizations where pedophilia was present. I point out that kings have ruled over civilizations with slavery, racism, jingoism, cannibalism, etc. And you drops this point entirely.
3. You make the claim that I have a castle build — not only that, but I have a classified out! Where is this castle build? Where is this classified? And why would should this mean anything even if it wasn’t just the blathering imagination of a pedophile apologist? Who knows! You drop this point entirely
4. Now you are saying that I am in the wrong because I assosciated ageplay with child pornography, when this article is about _child pornography in ageplay_. Can you just drop this one too and spare yourself further eMbarrassment?
Oh, here, I’ll write your rebuttal: You are like prokofy and you are TRYING to sound smart, but you are not, you are dumb, so there!
Just a thought
Dec 24th, 2006
You know, I’m just sitting here, wondering how someone like you managed to survive to this point Freddy boy.
I haven’t ‘abandoned’ anything at all – I’ve made my points and frankly anyone reading this is only going to have two opposing person’s words to contrast.
I read the article – it’s just another one of those “ask (insert name here) pieces of trash that are in every publication.
frankly I really don’t give a damn what the article contained, that’s really not what I’m here about Freddy boy, I’m here due to your initial comment – one that makes an assumption about an entire demographic by it just being here.
Yes, there was a classified out – about a month or so ago actually, it’s not there anymore and as I already said – or perhaps you missed it? – I may have you confused with another pretentious SL user that refers to himself as a King.
As for the rest? Sorry Freddy boy but modern ‘Kings’ do not enter into the equation – these days most of them are little more that a mouthpiece or a figurehead – no power, no bearing on anything at all. Nope, the era of Kings was the Medieval Ages.
You have attempted to use arguments that have nothing at all to do with this issue, you refuse to admit you made a mistake: fine.
I’m done with you Freddy boy – on this one anyway: why? You’re not worth my time or energy anymore – or at least not the time or energy it would take to get you to admit to posting a comment you (probably did not) know would be taken in a context other than what you had intended – something I myself have done on occasion, and quite frankly I don’t hesitate to admit when something has been taken out of context.
Just a thought
Dec 24th, 2006
As an add-on to the above, this post alone shows you knowingly mistook said demographic for the people you loathe:
“Yes, for the record, though I’m using the term “ageplayer” I’m not referring to people who just like to play in child avatars, I’m talking about people who get off on child avatars having sex — aka child pornography.”
Pedophilia is pedophilia, not Age Play, despite what some may think. Like other types of role Play, there are extremes and differing groups within the group, take for example (often the most misunderstood) Furries. commonly seen as sex crazed players of Animals – when in reality that is a small segment of the group – and scorned by the vast majority, in fact some go so far as to say that that segment isn’t even a part of the group, all thanks to the negative spin the media and others put on it.
Call a spade a spade Freddy boy, not a shovel (or in this case, digging implement).
King Frederick
Dec 24th, 2006
“I haven’t ‘abandoned’ anything at all”
Lawl.
Okay, you haven’t “abandoned” them, you’ve simply stopped asserting them in the face of a mild rebuttal.
“I really don’t give a damn what the article contained,”
Then STFU because I’m commenting on the article.
“one that makes an assumption about an entire demographic ”
Only if you read shit into it.
“Yes, there was a classified out – about a month or so ago actually, it’s not there anymore and as I already said – or perhaps you missed it? – I may have you confused with”
In otherwords, you’re a dizzy ditz who doesn’t know here from there.
“modern ‘Kings’ do not enter into the equation – these days most of them are little more that a mouthpiece or a figurehead”
Yes, that’s nice, and how do you know that my “character” isn’t just one of these? Or a King from a purely fantasy world? You don’t. You just made a shitty argument. You assume that because I use the term “king” that my “character” (lol) must be imitating some specific European king in a wooden-literal fashion.
You made a laughably idiotic point, deal with it.
“Nope, the era of Kings was the Medieval Ages”
Yes, because there were no kings in other parts of the world like Europe, there were no kings in the bronze age, there were no kings in Asia, etc. And there certainly isn’t a rich literary tradition of fictional kings ruling over fictional realms, boy howdy.
“ou refuse to admit you made a mistake: fine”
Irony explosion
“You’re not worth my time or energy anymore”
It’s painfully obvious that you’re just covering your ass here to preserve your e-honor. Rest assured that I won’t even remember having this conversation a week from now, nor will I recognize your moniker. However, your embarrassment remains here as a monument to your inability to ‘defend’ the people you’re ‘defending,’ mighty black knight of the pedophile round table.
“this post alone shows you knowingly mistook said demographic”
No, that post qualifies my statement to show that I know that there are some people who just weirdly like to pretend their babies with no interest in having sex. And that post refutes your point that I am “slandering an entire group of people” rather than one specific section of people, pedophile ageplayers.
Please, continue to bury yourself.
“commonly seen as sex crazed players of Animals – when in reality that is a small segment of the group ”
Lawl. You got buffetted by Second Life Safari didn’t you? Don’t worry, we’re done with your ageplaying, diaper-wearing, dog penis-wearing section of the community … for now.
Just tell your buddies to keep their groups sectioned off by banlines… Civilization doesn’t want to lose its lunch by accidentally seeing their activities.
Have a Merry Christmas. Try not to copulate with something that can’t consent, okay?
Just a thought
Dec 24th, 2006
You know, I find it funny that you are still attempting to make yourself sound intelligent Freddy boy … but seriously, I’m done.
The only person buried here is you: You made a comment that – even at face value – mistakenly paints everyone in a demographic as something you yourself hate. when someone comes in to challenge your viewpoint and points out to you the irony of using your current nickname while making this comment, you make an attempt to blow it off by citing useless facts.
Now here are the facts for you, and please – don’t bother responding (even though I know you will):
1.) You were called out on your own lack of understanding, in particular the irony of signing your comments as ‘King” Frederick. You then attempted to combat this (which really goes to show: you apparently know nothing at all about how such things are seen) by citing useless facts about an era that does not even enter into the original comment calling you out on your own nickname. (In short Freddy boy, you held up a flimsy excuse).
2.) You attempt to liken this practice you loathe so much to other things which have no bearing whatsoever on the subject matter. Nice try though – next time stick to the matter at hand.
3.) when faced with (possibly) mistaken data you jump all over it as if it was the crowning and shining verification you needed to give your argument the boost it needed. doesn’t work that way Freddy boy.
4.) when I said that all I want at this point was for you to admit you made a mistake …. you continued in a fashion true to those that haven’t a bloody clue.
5.) My most recent comment was, as per usual when dealing with your ilk, scanned for anything you could jump on and (attempt) to use to your advantage. did I say anything about being a furry? Nope – not a word. I intentionally used that example because I have noticed that furries are another of your little pet peeves.
Now, since you’re incapable of being civilized and not resorting to labeling based on the most circumstantial of items, or your own personal thoughts – as said before, I’m done with you.
I really do hope you run into the wrong person to pull these stunts with in real life Freddy boy – if only to show you that people like you invariably end off getting their head handed to them.
astro
Dec 25th, 2006
Can i shoot myself now?