Natalia and Slave 3 — Post 6 D/s Lifestylers

by Alphaville Herald on 03/08/11 at 1:02 pm

[Natalia messaged me several weeks ago and asked if I would be willing to feature her and one or two of her slaves. I haven’t featured a couple (or triple) that I can recall, so I thought it might be fun. It was a pleasure working with both Natalia and Slave 3, and it is an honor to introduce them to you as this week’s Post 6 couple. ~Timothy Morpork]

Natalia and Slave 3 Final 1

I was unaware of the D/s lifestyle until I came to Second Life. I knew there was BDSM and bondage and all kinds of weird things over there in the leather and fetish aisle, but I lumped it all together as weird. A woman I met at a club owned a Pet, and I learned about it from her. I have quite taken to the role of Mistress, and I hope my slaves and pets will tell you that I am a good Mistress to have.

I prefer slaves to pets, even if they are roleplayed the same, because I prefer the permanence that rings in the word “slave.” Currently I own three males, the one featured here is my newest and current favorite, Slave 3. I spoil and pamper him like a Pet and in return he would do anything for me.

Natalia and Slave 3 Final 2

 I do not like the restrained life viewer and I will not own anyone that insists I make them use it. I am very slow to accept someone as my slave, they have to earn the right to receive my collar, as I think the D/s lifestyle is dependent on a good and solid relationship built on trust, not on programming or gimmicks. Many of my friends use the RLV and I have nothing against it, I just am not a user and nor will my chattel be.

I do enjoy the drama and the comments that the D/s lifestyle gets in-world and in forums. There is nothing so exciting as bringing one or all of my slaves on their leashes to a public event. Slave 3 is especially a lightning rod because he wears a black avatar, but I assure you that race is not part of our roleplay. He signed up to serve me, which is the most important part of what makes D/s so much fun- we know and want and willingly accept our roles.

Natalia and Slave 3 Final 3

I believe that if society were more honest and allowed for more of a variety of relationships, like viewing D/s as an equal to marriage, the world would be a much better place. Men and women have only a couple of choices as to how to present themselves to the world (married, single, gay, straight) and we end up with a lot of unhappy pegs in the wrong shaped hole. With more flavors like Domme, Furry, Polygamist, or Witch in the mix, more people would be happier. Feel free to discuss that one amongst yourselves.

Thanks to the Alphaville Herald and to Timothy for featuring us. It has been a thrill and an honor.

53 Responses to “Natalia and Slave 3 — Post 6 D/s Lifestylers”

  1. James Freud

    Aug 3rd, 2011

    Nice to see slavery is alive and well in SL.

    What do you call him….Mandingo?

  2. Nelson Jenkins

    Aug 3rd, 2011

    Since my comment is going to await moderation forever because I said the n-word (although faggot isn’t counted as a “bad word”, but this one is)…

    Just don’t let that Tubman coon get to ‘im, missus. She be causin’ some real malarkey up in these here parts.

  3. Yep

    Aug 3rd, 2011

    G getem Tiger :P

  4. lolol

    Aug 3rd, 2011

    I want a black slave!

  5. fararden

    Aug 3rd, 2011

    My question is if Natalia is a Mistress then why is she wearing a slave collar?

    Natalia is definitely not wearing a choker because the collar has a slave ring just like Slave 3′s collar.

  6. Shyayn Lusch

    Aug 3rd, 2011

    “Slave 3″ looks remarkably just like Timothy’s current avatar. Was this Miss short a man and substituted the photog himself?

  7. IntLibber

    Aug 4th, 2011

    Lessee, furry death camps are “broadly offensive” but black slaves with big cocks aren’t. Gotcha. LL are racists.

  8. hobo kelly

    Aug 4th, 2011

    so that black guy is really the Post 6 guy, MoarPork? and MoarPork is getting off pretending to be a black Slave when he is really like the black Pimp and thats the reason that Natalia has a collar on is because she is the ‘ho, and possibly they are both the same person because MoarPork likes to go around with a ready slave and needs a female alt?? whoa… the stuff you read in the Herald…

  9. Beans Galore

    Aug 4th, 2011

    I wouldn’t get too excited, that avatar is off the rack and common as the day is long;

  10. Orca Flotta

    Aug 4th, 2011

    I like Natalia’s view on that RLV rubbish and also that a person of colour is free enough to chose to be a slave rather than a pet.
    If the portrayed persons are mains or alts … and of whom … well, who cares? It’s not anyone’s business to know.

  11. ?¿?

    Aug 4th, 2011

    @ Intlibber
    Would you find it less racist if LL allowed anyone to be a slave or have a big dick if they wanted, except black avatars…?

    And do you think it was the ‘furry’ part of furry deathcamp that was offensive, or perhaps the ‘deathcamp’ part after all? Why dont you make a black human deathcamp to check and let us know your findings.

    Alternatively you could just use your brain for once.

  12. At0m0 Beerbaum

    Aug 4th, 2011

    @ questionmark faggot

    yet they allow nazifurs to roam freely amongst the grid, you know, a group that popularized deathcamps in modern history and represent an ideology that flies in the face of most of humanity?

    perfectly fine.

    I bet they could make a deathcamp and not be glanced at by LL.

    The part about it being a deathcamp for furries (laughable, because furries arent even a race or ethnic group, just overzealous bestiality fanboys that have yet to come to terms with the fact that their pet dog turns them on.) is what LL hates.

    (spoilers: many big wigs at LL are furries)

  13. ?¿?

    Aug 4th, 2011

    Sure Ill take that bet. Make a deathcamp in any way you want call it and we’ll see how long it lasts.

  14. ?¿?

    Aug 4th, 2011

    PS. I bet that non furrry nazi’s are also allowed to roam the grid freely. And when you say “ideology that flies in the face of most of humanity” are you talking about nazi ideology specifically? I assume so because from where I’m looking at humanity the hate for different people is still far too common. Only this time it’s not jews but muslims who are the popular target.
    It amazes me sometime that people fail to see the similarities between what happened then and what is happening now. Same shit different victims.
    Sure there’s no camps where torture is taking place this time… oh wait there is. Only the guards and torturers are not German this time.

  15. Pappy Enoch

    Aug 4th, 2011

    “There is nothing so exciting as bringing one or all of my slaves on their leashes to a public event.”

    Git a dawg, gal.

    How many o’ y’all want to bet that feller is a Brother IRL? My bookie won’t even lay odds on that one.

    Hoo whee….I needs another drink.

  16. Skye D.

    Aug 4th, 2011

    “There is nothing so exciting as bringing one or all of my slaves on their leashes to a public event.”

    *Sigh* I’m probably going to get a lot of guff for this, but here goes…

    I dunno…maybe I’m prudish, but I really hate it when roleplayers bring this sort of RP out of their private areas, and pull this sh*t in public. If I want to see it, I’ll go where it’s done. But when I’m out and about doing pictures, at a nightclub with a friend, at an art opening, or out shopping, the last thing I want to see is someone leading around another person like a freakin’ dog.

    I’ve privately IM’d more than a few Dommes about this, and usually get a ton of attitude, and am generally told to “get a life”. But when I point out that they’re in a PG or G sim, and their slave’s ass is hanging out for anyone to see, they’re chatting in character via public chat for anyone to read, and that their behavior is really inappropriate for the setting, they usually huff and puff but beat a hasty retreat.

    Trust me. There are a lot of people who don’t buy into or want to see this. To me, it’s incredibly rude to foist it on them. I know I’ll probably get a few “Well if you don’t like it, then leave” retorts. But that’s crap too. Why should *I* have to leave because *your* behavior is inappropriate? It’s my world too, after all.

    I have no problem with anyone that wants to RP like this. It’s fun, after all! Just…do it in private, or areas designated for it.

  17. Stillforge Pigeon

    Aug 4th, 2011

    @Skye D

    Oh I know! I really hate it when people in wheelchairs come to events too, and when women breastfeed in public. And OMG! People kissing in public just drives me up a wall! In fact, anything that’s different than what I do just makes me crazy!

  18. Lili

    Aug 5th, 2011

    Yayyyy slavery. How come I didn’t think of that?

  19. Yep

    Aug 5th, 2011

    I know I make these dorks remove their collers and leashes in my sim. the first word out of their mouth besides “ok” I send them flying.

    They may be a master in their sims, but in mine they are just dorky master-baders to me.
    there is no room outside Zindra for these dorks, that is why zindra was made. For all the freaky geeky people to mingle and let the normal people do their thing outside of zindra without having to see the weirdo’s.

  20. Dread Judge

    Aug 5th, 2011

    I look forward to saying “I knew this thread when it was just a pup”

  21. At0m0 Beerbaum

    Aug 5th, 2011

    @ mister question mark

    yeah I was referring to the nazi ideology, I also wrote that on 4 hours of sleep.

    Now here’s the big kicker: dress up as a human AV in nazi garb in SL, you will get banned. Now, nazifurs, dress up in nazi paraphernalia, never even get as much as a warning. I bet if nazifurs made a deathcamp where “fursecutors” or whoever they hate go, it would be allowed to stay around forever.

    My point was, furries get away with everything in SL namely because they tend to scream the loudest when they get caught doing wrong, and there are linden bigwigs who are furry.

    Just pointing out that fun little bit of hypocrisy and that yes, it was the furry part of the deathcamp that was deemed intolerable.

    It was also absolutely hilarious when you saw how ridiculous it was and why it existed in the first place. (to piss off the Alliance navy who were headquartered in the same sim, who tended to be douches, and had furry members who were likely to get pissy)

    to illustrate the point further: the whole thing was a tongue in cheek reaction to typical furry horseshit where their being criticized for being a bunch of manchildren is akin to being persecuted on the same level as the jews, or blacks, or any other minority group that have gone through suffering in the past at the hands of an oppressor, usually on the level of being enslaved or killed in massive genocides. We just built what they considered they were going through :)

  22. IntLibber

    Aug 5th, 2011

    Ya, corroborating At0m0, I know for instance, that Vanguard military group got their first full sim build returned in its entirety by Jeska Linden because there were a few swastikas obscurely seen on the grills of some vehicles, and dont forget the famous Kirby case where a US senator’s staffer drunkenly posted swastikas and a hitler poster claiming that Kirby avatars hated our troops. Harry Linden banned that guy and his stuff pretty quickly. Again: human avatar. Meanwhile, the Furzis had a death camp on the mainland near one of the main welcome areas for a long time with LL blessing. Meanwhile, the G-team got into a habit of banning any black avatars they found on the racist principle that they had to be PN since real black people dont use computers. I think the only black av who escaped that purge was Filthy Fluno and that was only because Pathfinder was RL besties with him.

  23. ?¿?

    Aug 5th, 2011

    Nazi shit should be bannable the grid over furries or not. I agree fully with you two on that. Exception of course for having it around for historical education but thats often used as an excuse by neonazis. Tho thats easy to spot, people with an interest in WW2 history usually dontgo around wearing SS uniforms.

    Anywho, this black man with a leash is more free then the naysayers in these comments… to qote from Jeff Wayne’s version of War of the worlds; “Man is born in freedom but soon becomes a slave, in cages of convention from the cradle to the grave”

    This guy and the woman holding his leash escaped those cages.

  24. Skye D.

    Aug 5th, 2011

    @ Stillforge:

    “Oh I know! I really hate it when people in wheelchairs come to events too, and when women breastfeed in public. And OMG! People kissing in public just drives me up a wall! In fact, anything that’s different than what I do just makes me crazy!”

    I knew there would be someone that would take what I said and compare it to things that are of a completely different context. I have no problem with breastfeeding, people in wheelchairs, or kissing in public. Those are everyday, situational things.

    I *do* have a problem with people roleplaying their sexual proclivities in areas that are clearly not meant for such a thing. I was involved in a RL M/s relationship at one time, and when we were in public you would never have known. We were a normal couple, doing normal couple-y things. That aspect of our relationship was kept strictly in private, and we would never have even considered disrespecting others by acting out in public.

    There is a time and a place for such activities, and public events or obviously busy public spaces is not them.

  25. Persephone Bolero

    Aug 5th, 2011

    It’s really funny how many people are focusing on the race of the slave. What about the position of the woman in this relationship? Isn’t this more about the empowerment of women than the subjugation of a race?

    I have to agree with Skye, though. There are many in the D/s lifestyle who take it outside areas where its appropriate.

  26. Senban Babii

    Aug 5th, 2011

    “Isn’t this more about the empowerment of women than the subjugation of a race?”

    Okay so let’s reverse it. Let’s make it a white male owning a female black slave.

    Is it suddenly about the empowerment of males? Would that be acceptable?

    The empowerment of one party should not be at the expense of disempowering the other party.

  27. lol

    Aug 5th, 2011

    I wonder if the black slave knows his master is really a Man IRL

  28. Prez Obama

    Aug 5th, 2011

    Well look at this, the USA finally gets a Black man in the white house, and yet a W.A.S.P. can still own a negro slave. Rev Al Sharpton was right nothing has changed in america

  29. hobo kelly

    Aug 5th, 2011

    Nazifurs? Really? mmm, nazi furs… it kinda rolls off of the tounge as you say it… nnnnaaaaazziiiiieeeeeee ffuuuuuuurrrrrrrrzzzz… nazi furs, furs which were handed down from the third reich would now be at least about 70 years old. Im kinda gaining a new interest in furs, here to fore thought to be disgusting, but now, i wonder if you get to have swatstickers on your uniform instead of these iron crosses which arent bad but with a nice swatsticker on your arm, blood red against a black leather SS uniform, them dumb sonsabitches think twice when they see you come along, with your minaturized supernatural uber waffen devices designed for pain, secreted in your leather vest, and your Luger hanging from your Sam Brown belt. Not to mention the Nazi Death Dagger… You gotta love a smart snappy deadly uniform properly worn by someone that would gladly send you to the electrical retraining camp for looking at them wrong. you would follow a uniform like that anywhere… ok snap, out of it. I could never put on a furry head. but i gotta see one of these Nazi Furs in action some time. also: Intlibber, please post more.

    the Fuhrer has determined that you may all return to your discussions, but remember, we are watching you and we have ways to make you talk…

  30. At0m0 Beerbaum

    Aug 7th, 2011

    another case in point:

    the furry deathcamp didnt tout nazi imagry IIRC, just a lot of anti-furry imagery, then tons of shock images plastered around the border by various people who later came in.

  31. At0m0 Beerbaum

    Aug 7th, 2011

    I agree with skye, and this is why furries got so butthurt when going to our sims. they go around with their sexual roleplay (b-but furries arent all about sex! zomg!) and they got butthurt and shocked when they got harassed or trolled about it, as did anyone who came in with sexual roleplay shit.

    The fun part was when people would create skyboxes in our sims with sex beds and were genuinely shocked when we stood around their bed making comments.

    works much better than banning people. they never come back after the fact :)

  32. Jim Tarber

    Aug 8th, 2011

    “The empowerment of one party should not be at the expense of disempowering the other party.”

    @Senban Babii, while that may have been true under the forced servitude of the past, this is entirely different. Before I’d criticize this mutually agreed arrangment, I’d be pretty certain that the other party actually felt disempowered, and more importantly, that they felt this was a bad thing. There are probably thousands of SL residents whose dream is to find this kind of arrangement described here.

  33. Persephone Bolero

    Aug 8th, 2011

    “The empowerment of one party should not be at the expense of disempowering the other party.”

    It’s always amusing to watch people speak for others. Obviously, these people are in this relationship through mutual agreement. And at anytime, they can sever it. So with all due respect, Senban, your statement here was pretty arrogant. How do you know that this man isn’t perfectly happy with their arrangement?

  34. Senban Babii

    Aug 8th, 2011

    “So with all due respect, Senban, your statement here was pretty arrogant. How do you know that this man isn’t perfectly happy with their arrangement?”

    Absolutely. I’m not for one second saying that he actually *is* a slave. I mean it’s *possible* that he is, kept against his will and forced to log into SL but it’s pretty unlikely, right?

    But my comment was entirely aimed at addressing *your* point.

    “Isn’t this more about the empowerment of women than the subjugation of a race?”

    So I wasn’t “speaking for others” as you put it, I was offering a counter to _your_ point.

    The same point can be addressed to Jim Tarber who also commented. I’m not questioning the issue of SLavery. I was addressing a point made by Persephone. Both of you need to recognise this fact and not go off on knee-jerk reactions, making assumptions.

  35. Persephone Bolero

    Aug 9th, 2011

    @Senban “But my comment was entirely aimed at addressing *your* point.”

    Then your counter point made no sense. At all. By asking about a white male owning a black woman, you only repeated my point. Either that or you’re completely oblivious to the double standards involved here, which, when illuminated, expose the absurdity in all the politically correct issues people are taking with the man’s race.

    So, thanks for making my point…again. Whether you intended to or not, you did.

  36. Senban Babii

    Aug 10th, 2011

    Okay, you win Persephone. Wow, you’re so right? Please, continue.

  37. Persephone Bolero

    Aug 10th, 2011

    @Senban Oh, don’t be like that. It’ll just go to my head.

  38. Senban Babii

    Aug 10th, 2011

    Sorry, Persephone, bad morning dealing with people who were born with cheese in place of a brain, I was just trying to back out gracefully instead of getting drawn into a long debate about the issue.


  39. NAACP

    Aug 14th, 2011

    NAACP here, what’s going on this thread?

  40. Yep

    Aug 16th, 2011

    Go getem Tiger :D

  41. Ugh

    Aug 16th, 2011

    Oh my, a comment with a naughty racist word seems to have gone missing….

    shall we call the cold case investigators or will Nelson or Pix please explain where the missing comment went?

  42. Yep

    Aug 16th, 2011

    Tiger’s comment was deleted too :(

  43. Ugh

    Aug 16th, 2011

    That’s the one I meant.

    Go get ‘em yep

  44. Yep

    Aug 16th, 2011

    Why would I go get Tiger? I like Tiger :P

  45. Senban Babii

    Aug 24th, 2011

    Why haven’t we had a Post Sicks for three weeks?

  46. Senban Babii

    Aug 31st, 2011

    Why haven’t we had a Post Sicks for four weeks?

  47. Anon7

    Sep 7th, 2011

    D/s is for the most part a dangerous and often damaging lifestyle
    the proponents seldom mention the people that leave after being abused or psychological damage.

    They even mask the issue with claims that the damage is not from D/s but that it just happens.. even on sites that are all about the damaged people in the lifestyle

  48. Senban Babii

    Sep 7th, 2011

    Why haven’t we had a Post Sicks for five weeks?

  49. IntLibber Brautigan

    Sep 7th, 2011

    Because SL ran out of actual women (not that that was ever a qualifier to pose nude here…)

Leave a Reply