Griefer U
by prokofy on 22/04/07 at 10:48 pm
By Prokofy Neva, Dept. of Community Affairs
The Herald has been deluged lately with indignant complaints about weird goon goings-on in what is supposed to be an educational sim, Woodbury University. As usually with all the Eddie Haskelling and word-salad alibi-Ike sort of stuff involved, it’s hard to get at the truth — and as Uri always says, we’ll have to hope it emerges in the comments.
If you blinked, you missed it, but on April 12, the Lindens’ police blotter had this note:
Date: Thursday, April 12, 2007
Violation: Community Standards: Harassment, Soliciting Abuse
Region: Woodbury University
Description: Organizing abusive attacks on regions.
Action taken: Suspended 3 days.
In fact, oddly, googling the terms “Woodbury University” and “Second Life” gives you that police blotter item first, then somebody’s blog about visiting the island campus, and little else. This lack of hard information about the strange edu sim has spawned a persisent rumour that the U.S. government has funded this RL university, located in…Burbank, California (nee-noo, nee-noo, LL is in California!) to create a fake griefer group and launch simulated terror attacks on the unsuspecting SL population to study responses.
Our stringer, Aging Hippie Random Unsung, the Eternal Student, went out to Woodbury last night and came up with a different diagnosis. After being challenged by notorious Patriotic Nigras griefer Mudlips, on security detail but unable to boot anyone, Random concluded: “I figure the professor who bought this sim is on leave, and the Trustifarians have taken over,” he said.
When he arrived at the sim, it was being rebuilt, evidently after a griefer trashed it and caused what one source says was close to $1000 US worth of damage (?).
A hodge-podge collection of kids in motley uniforms and costumes of different genres greeted him, and despite the title “Woodland Security,” didn’t have the ability to eject Unsung on sight.
A frequent flyer griefer of the Ravenglass sims was seen in mufti sporting the faux “security” title, and it was either that the inmates had taken over the asylum, Unsung concluded, or the manager, one Tizzers Foxchange, described as “Woodbury Admin,” figured that the best way to guard a sim from griefers like the Patriotic Nigras in Second Life, was to hire the PNs as your security goons. Great concept!
Tizzers seemed very eager, while the others were word-salading and free-associating and clanging, to show that she has an exemplary record with LL, and does not engage in, or condone griefing. But we’ve seen it all in SL, and we know that one of the first things griefers do is make all these plausible-deniability groups like “Concerned Griefers of America” or go and donate to the cause of fighting cancer via the American Cancer Society to try to cleanse their tarnished image.
An avatar named MC Fizgig is described as the “Woodbury Professor” but there is almost no activity showing on his avatar, i.e. no picture, comments, First Life info, groups except “Woodbury” itself. So he may be AFK, and not realizing what’s happening, and not at all have a gig with the Dept. of Homeland Security — or he could have invented the PNs to test stuff. Who knows?
The Lindens used to have strict rules for any researchers coming into SL to study people, but with the corporate invasion and marketing explosion, all of that’s been thrown overboard, in part due to the bitching of the Herald about oppression of academic freedom. So it’s not known if there is anything remotely like this experiment claimed, or if LL knows anything about it. It is likely that Woodbury got the usual educational non-profit discount, however, of $150 for the sim instead of $195 (or a discount off the new tier of $295).
The rag-tag ranks of security at Woodbury consisted of one avatar running around crying “Sieg Heil!”, goose-stepping, and making “Heil Hitler” type of salutes in her Nazi regalia; another strange cat semi-dressed with a fez covering his private parts, and various other “hello kitty” sorts of avatars. If anybody interested in researching this chaos further, contact me for the chat logs.
By her own admission, Tizzers regularly reads 4chan’s site, which she described neutrally as a site for “Japanese image preservation” or some such nonsense, though everyone knows that it is Griefer Central for some of the worst marauders of SL. I’m not going to have to prove this in just a minute; watch the comments fill up with the worst kind of crap. Tizzers is also in some of the classic /b/tard groups like “Gay 4 Philip”.
Somebody needs to write Woodbury’s Board of Trustees or President and complain about these goose-stepping griefers who have indeed caused a lot of damage and lost business and down-time in SL for a number of sims — though the facts there aren’t confirmed, either, and it is hard to know who’s snowing whom on all this. The Lindens prove curiously unable to stop this, though rumour has it that they cull the PN alts every once in awhile and also infiltrate their groups to see what they’re doing.
I might add that if Homeland Security or for that matter any other government or university agency wishes to study simulated terrorism in SL, they don’t need to buy an island or have a special campus. Just come fly around the mainland with us on Governor Linden’s Estate : )
Random Unsung
Apr 23rd, 2007
“I don’t know Random Unsung. We’ve never been properly introduced. I imagine it’s because we’re never online at the same time.”
Hi, Random here. Just wanted to state that I am indeed not Prokofy’s alt, we’re simply in the same groups, with the same interests! I’m glad you were able to get this posted for me Prokofy, people need to know about the pig-headed Leninist cults popping up everywhere with their pernicious attacks. Of course, it’s the FIC and the Sherpas that are behind all that, ready to devour Second Life, people simply have to know about what’s going on out there!
-Random Unsung: Totally not a Prokofy Alt. Totally.
Visit my blog!
http://secondthoughts.typepad.com/second_thoughts/2006/06/getting_started.html
Hazim Gazov
Apr 23rd, 2007
>> Hi, Random here. Just wanted to state that I am indeed Prokofy’s alt.
Fixed.
mootykips
Apr 23rd, 2007
“This goes well beyond Second Life, and as you brought up with Hal Turner even spills into the real world now. Maybe you guys really should start cleaning yourselves up and maybe you wouldn’t be under so much scrutiny. By the way I don’t condone Hal Turner’s shithead antics but many of you anon aren’t helping by goading him on and hiding behind your “just cause” just to get some laughs.”
Spoiler: we did it for the lulz, not because Hal Turner’s a racist.
“All you anon seem to care about lately is getting sympathy points and getting in the headlines anywhere. You yourselves have lost what /b/, 4chan, or whatever was about in the first place. Don’t cry know because you are mostly reviled around the internet for crap you did in the past and are now trying to clean the crap you tracked everywhere from your boots.”
Says a guy who think we raided Hal because..uh..he was a racist. Yeah. You’re totally one to know what /b/ is about.
The fact is: you guys are hilarious. Apparently, you’re debating a bunch of PN over some land that wasn’t even ours, saying all *channers are PN, and then bitching about how awful we are for..uh..wait..being “Leninist” cyber-terrorists?
STOP TAKING THE INTERNET SO SERIOUSLY. Or, you know, don’t. Either way, *chan doesn’t care about what you think of them and PN just laughs at you internally. Keep debating about how bad 4chan is, keep lumping innocent landowners in with us, keep attempting to spy on us, keep trying to debate with us in futility, keep banning us one by one or in groups or in bases or in groups or on land, keep dressing up like superheroes on a game and calling mommy and daddy on us. It won’t work – we are the hardened war veterans of the Internet, and the whole “you’re big meanies, stop being e-terrorists, 4chan is a bunch of fat/skinny nerds” shit doesn’t faze us.
Shut down (all the furry sims) or shut up. Either way we win. None of this finger-pointing provides anything but laughs. We don’t get butthurt by accusations or bans or precious Linden space moneys being lost.
Ordinal Malaprop
Apr 23rd, 2007
“STOP TAKING THE INTERNET SO SERIOUSLY. Or, you know, don’t. Either way, *chan doesn’t care about what you think of them and PN just laughs at you internally”
> After all, what is a man? A miserable pile of secrets. We will expose your secrets, force you to face your demons, and demand you listen to your own stupidity.
> We will do it through madness. And we will remove you from the high place you have built yourself.
mootykips
Apr 23rd, 2007
I see no contradiction.
SomeRandomGuy
Apr 23rd, 2007
>>-Random Unsung: Totally not a Prokofy Alt. Totally.
Aaaaand the Walmartesque slogan is supposed to be dissuading? Your similar ineptitude in manipulating words removes all doubt from my mind.
You misunderstand /b/ more than I thought. Realize that the shock images are taken at face value. They are what they are, not something that the majority of us enjoy or would seek to replicate. The way /b/tards act is part of the funny, as is implied by the -tard suffix. Retards are funny in the same depraved way as most of the memes. You might say the average person would call it wrong, but I think you’re forgetting one important thing about anything mainstream. For something to be as popular as /b/ as to get a million posts in a week and a half would require a whole lot of people, and that’s going to add up to average. When a lot of average people start talking and sharing pictures without identities on a site with minimalist rules, you’re going to get, for lack of a more accurate description, some fucked up shit. People post horrible images to constantly piss off people because they can and they get a kick out of it. People who make serious posts are often given responses in the “snappy answers to stupid question” fashion; most commonly they are told to “become an hero,” a meme which translates to “kill yourself.” What I find more appalling than Anonymous telling someone to kill themselves is that you’d actually take anything on /b/ seriously. That’s the point – hard and honest, veiled in only the lightest sarcasm – that you should keep in mind around /b/. The internet is NOT serious business, spelled out clearly since no one seems to get it.
That being said, I don’t like to see shock images. I tolerate them because I have to if I want to peruse /b/. Remember that is has no rules. If you go there, you’re agreeing to see whatever you see. Don’t go there expecting to see flowers and sunshine. I don’t actually see shock images all that often. Porn is more common, but most of the pictures are image macros and stupid crap, threads about insincere senseless violence and funny things that happened yesterday.
And it’s stupid to say that everyone gives three cheers for raiding. They laugh at others’ misfortunes, which you probably think is wrong, but they’re not the ones raiding. They take it for what it is and laugh, shouting about serious business and habeebing it. It’s supposed to be funny. If it’s not your cup of tea, then GTFO.
It’s the raiders that you will focus on. You have to, because if you don’t, then you are accusing /b/tards who just want to act like idiots with their friends and chuckle at those unlucky enough to get raided of doing something wrong when they are innocent. You may not agree with /b/’s idea of fun, but proactive punishment against /b/tards is worse than laughing at a scrunched cat.
mootykips
Apr 23rd, 2007
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
NobodyImportant
Apr 23rd, 2007
Dear “and what”; regarding your comment,
“Odd, I saw many older accounts harassing a a Vtech memorial and we all know PNs can’t keep an account for a few weeks or a few days. Some of these people had the “Woodbury University” group in their profiles and were using many known /b/ memes.”
I have a newsflash.
Have you heard of Seworrun Koenig? Possibly. Maybe not. You won’t find him in a Second Life search, because he’s been banned.
That, however, is not the point I’m about to make.
I knew Seworrun, or “Sew”, as he was called in the PN ranks. He joined the Patriotic Nigras months ago. During the third “base” the PN had set up, I believe that was sometime around January of this year.
Sew was banned just after the “JLU raid” the PN organized (where they used a weapon to take down four sims in quick succession, that were supposedly confirmed Justice League headquarters). Sew was able to keep one account – ONE account – for months. Months. Granted, Sew was only an idea man and a weapons designer, but nevertheless; Sew was a PN.
So don’t assume that all PN members are unable to keep accounts for extended lengths of time. Sew is blatant proof it’s been done.
And by the way, Sew was my brother, in case you’re wondering how I know all this.
Huge Chavez
Apr 23rd, 2007
/b/ is but a pale shadow of FYAD, where true meta comes from
Hazim Gazov
Apr 23rd, 2007
>>The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
I am Plastic Duck.
Anonymous
Apr 23rd, 2007
how random
Anonymous
Apr 23rd, 2007
http://www.secondlifeherald.com/slh/2005/07/coryd_comes_to_.html
cickmy lunt
Apr 23rd, 2007
lawl
Seriously
Apr 23rd, 2007
Oh noes. The /b/astards themselves are all hovering around making fun of how serious everyone is taking all this. While they try to seriously legitimize what they do. Seriously everyone is too serious. And seriously you /b/astards, go lurk inside walls plastered with Desu and stay there in your own little insignificant part of the internets. Brag about all your numbers, well you’re still outnumbered. Seriously.
Tenshi Vielle
Apr 23rd, 2007
I’m sorry, did I just miss something here? You wrote a piece while praying to whatever god that someone in the comments would clear it up for you?
…could someone other than Prokofy write an article, please? Seriously.
Anonymous
Apr 24th, 2007
MUDKIPZ!
Bridget
Apr 24th, 2007
No I’m Plastic Duck.
Random Unsung
Apr 24th, 2007
You can’t be Plastic Duck, plastic duck is stalking my children right now. I mean, Prokofy’s children. Because I am not Prokofy. I am Random Unsung. Thanks for putting that up there Prokofy, people need to know about the Bolshevik cults and their nazi followers! Them, combined with the sherpas form what I like to call, the Toxic Three and their legion of doom. Thankfully, we have you, our own “hero” if you will, to protect us from this ever-present danger with your words that bring fear into their stalinistic nazi minds!
Hazim Gazov
Apr 24th, 2007
Have you checked the children? Yeah, I ate them, napkin plix.
-Plasticine Quack
Bridget
Apr 24th, 2007
Shut up prokofy if you can be Random Unsung I can be Plastic Duck you fucking leninist.
cickmy lunt
Apr 24th, 2007
joking about eating children is assault and rape and i will not stand for it
hope you like fbi agents raiding your house
/b/astard
Apr 24th, 2007
It’s a wonder any /b/astard can carry on any sort of discussion without reverting back to childish antics. Oh wait. That’s already happened.
Nacon
Apr 24th, 2007
Nice to see a good example of retardation falls in hands of SL Heralds to withhold their… image?
Whatever, nice to know how much of a junk the herald is.
(stupid leet mode) LOLZ?
tool
Apr 24th, 2007
So what if the Herald got most of it wrong it still brought all you little twips out of the woodwork to do you usual dances and spew your usual dribble. The Herald may be an asinine piece of garbage but majority of you anonymous are a cancer on the whole internet. At least the Herald is just a cancer that stays within the bowels of SL.
The /b/ pox needs to be wiped off the internet. Your 15 mins of fame are long up. Do not pass go, do not collect 200 dollars.
Sn4X15
Apr 24th, 2007
Tool:
Do you liek mudkipz?
SomeRandomGuy
Apr 24th, 2007
>>The /b/ pox needs to be wiped off the internet. Your 15 mins of fame are long up. Do not pass go, do not collect 200 dollars.
Are you aware of John Gabriel’s Greater Internet Fuckwad Theory?
http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2004/03/19
Enlighten yourself. The internet provides anonymity and safety from judgment. When people have to register themselves to a system, they worry about their reputations within the community. Since /b/tards are Anonymous and the ones who get b& last mere days or weeks on SL, they don’t give a shit how you insult them. They are like suicide bombers who would never dream of killing anyone, just annoying them for a while. It would be very hard to destroy /b/ and Anonymous now that they exist.
Nobody wants fame from this, you’re just feeding the trolls. By showing that we irritate you, you’re just provididng lulz. And even if you ignore our antics, we’re perfectly fine with entertaining ourselves. Hmm, yes, very hard indeed.
Anonymous
Apr 24th, 2007
No matter how badly you were trying to tarnish the image of woodbury, ANY press is still press. You have only strengthened their resolve.
In the long run they will win, and you will just be a whiny bitch on the internet.
Anyonymous
Apr 24th, 2007
I am Anonymous and I am a lemming. Must follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar follow moar
mootykips
Apr 24th, 2007
more like lurk moar amirite
Prokofy Neva
Apr 24th, 2007
>I’m sorry, did I just miss something here? You wrote a piece while praying to whatever god that someone in the comments would clear it up for you?
>…could someone other than Prokofy write an article, please? Seriously.
Jealous much?
Tenshi Vielle
Apr 24th, 2007
Nah. Just tired of reading “OMFG EVERYThING IS A CONSPIRACY FIGHT TEH POWER” … honestly. Just let it go. The sixties and seventies were over a long time ago. We know you participated in the movement, but we need progress here, not PTSD.
Prokofy Neva
Apr 24th, 2007
Tenshi, we all know you’re a brainless 20-something twit from the me-generation, but you can still learn some basics of journalism.
NEWS FLASH TENSHI! You can’t verify information on an anonymous, online world with alts and people doing fakes and heists and crap all the time. So, you give it your best shot, you cover what you can, but then due to the secrecy and propaganda factor, as in any closed society, you have to use other methods to get out the truth.
Getting people to post what they know in comments, getting people to contrast and compare the facts as delivered, helps to get the story checked. What needs to happen is that those people who care most about this need to contact the president’s office at Woodbury. My job here was to write an article illustrating there is a lot of community concern, and try to gather and present the facts. Not wishing to go pursue them endlessly when I am not paid to do so isn’t lazy journalism; it’s just not lazy real life, where I *am* paid.
College classes going to be over soon?
Prokofy Neva
Apr 24th, 2007
and BTW ANOTHER NEWS FLASH: I didn’t claim any conspiracy here, I *reported on* the claims of others who have gotten so worked up and so outraged at the Lindens allowing another v-5 griefing cluster to form and operate that they’ve concluded that the government or the university or somebody has a paid grant to do terrorism research.
I haven’t found any evidence to support that, nor did Random Unsung, my stringer : )
Instead, I think it’s just busy or lazy Lindens not wanting to take any firm action against people who are in their libsecondlife program. If anything, they may feel they’ve isolated the infection by having it stay on this one island.
Anonymous
Apr 24th, 2007
:: the 4chans and PN upset about their sim going foom
Hey, you guys trash other folks stuff and simcrash them all the time. Don’t take it so seriously – it’s just the Internet after all…
Enjoy a taste of your own medicine.
Hazim Gazov
Apr 24th, 2007
EXCUSE MOI, I NEVER crash sims, EVER. Seriously. Also the PN have nothing to do with V5 and Anshe Chung is better than Prokofy because she lives closer to mah elevens.
Anonymous
Apr 24th, 2007
>> Blacks and Jews upset about their sim going foom
>>Hey, you guys trash other folks stuff and simcrash them all >>the time. Don’t take it so seriously – it’s just the >>Internet after all…
>>Enjoy a taste of your own medicine.
Anonymous
Apr 24th, 2007
racist.
mootykips
Apr 24th, 2007
“the 4chans and PN upset about their sim going foom”
Um, no we don’t.
Hazim Gazov
Apr 24th, 2007
Wow mootykips, that was terrible, I only came twice. I give it a twelve for effort.
SomeRandomGuy
Apr 24th, 2007
How badly do you want the PN gone? Do you realize that it’s going to be virtually impossible to get rid of them? How do you stop people who dodge bans like mad? How do you handle eople who, when given attention, bring their lavish randomness to the forefront to further irritate and befuddle the general populace. They just want you to react to them, and maybe if you would get over the drama and artificial seriousness of your e-lives, they wouldn’t attack you.
But wait, I forgot. What is this article about?
Anonymous
Apr 24th, 2007
>>But wait, I forgot. What is this article about?
Combat frogs.
SomeRandomGuy
Apr 24th, 2007
i herd u like battletoads. is it tru?
MacGuyver
Apr 24th, 2007
This thread is now about video games. GO GO GO.
Prokofy Neva
Apr 24th, 2007
How badly do you want the PN gone? Do you realize that it’s going to be virtually impossible to get rid of them? How do you stop people who dodge bans like mad? How do you handle eople who, when given attention, bring their lavish randomness to the forefront to further irritate and befuddle the general populace. They just want you to react to them, and maybe if you would get over the drama and artificial seriousness of your e-lives, they wouldn’t attack you.
No, I don’t give in to terrorists who demand ransoms or concessions. I don’t care if it’s “virtually impossible” to get rid of them but one thing one can deny them is legitimacy and claims to the truth, which they do not possess. That’s always possible, and that will always spread and ultimately triumph. No terrorist is ever legitimate because of his choice of methods; no terrorist ever can claim possession of the truth because truth is not something that can be violently opposed; it immediately becomes a lie.
How do you handle people who bring “lavish randomness” to every occasion? Well, um, calling them idiot fucktards is a start. One can also hope they’ll grow up and find some other occupation.
I simply won’t countenance any concept that says that terrorists get to run the media, and tell everybody that if you pay attention to them and cover them in the media, especially critically, they’ll “get you” and “make it even worse”.
This spawns a little side industry of people who then cluck about over-coverage, especially critical coverage of terrorism. I totally agree that terrorism has to be covered prudently, so as to avoid needless attention-whoring occasions. That’s why the attack on Woodbury itself, the constant fretting by do-gooders about it, didn’t rise to the test of coverage IMHO. But at a certain point, you cover it as part of the larger issue: why do legitimate institutions (seemingly) get taken over by terrorists?
I refuse to enable a band of Internet fuckwads to tell me what I can and can’t take seriously. They have no power over me. If I want to take something seriously, I do, I’m free to do so, and no band of fuckwads can intimidate, bully, harass, and grief me into frog-marching, cowering and intimidated, into their concept of “fun”. Hell, no.
Drama is what they indulge in, trying to hysterically impose an extremist conservative notion of “not seriousness” on the world. They are anything but fun; they are deadly bores.
Anonymous
Apr 24th, 2007
Doom 3
Thread over.
Carigorp Matzerath
Apr 24th, 2007
Ok, Prokofy. We get it. But, remember that part when you said you didn’t have all the facts so you needed to leave certain things for residents with proper knowledge to pan out? You obviously don’t possess the proper knowledge concerning 4chan, /b/, and PN. So, why do you keep talking about it? Isn’t this the part where you let the people who know what they are saying spread the facts? I have done extensive research on the subject. I even use 4chan myself. 4chan does not equal griefers and /b/tards do not equal PN. It is as simple as that. Griefers are simply a subgroup of /b/. Not all of it, like you seem to claim. Woodbury has not been taken over by “terrorists”. It simply had a run in with the less desirable aspects of anonymous. It came right to its doorstep. Tizzers can’t help that PN came to the university and started mucking things up. After the incident occured, Tizzers started banning everyone in the group/sim that griefs. Some might slip through the cracks, but the ones that do will get reported to her. And, before you start feeding me lines about Plastic Duck, get some real proof other than taking your word for it. Find some hard evidence, and BRING IT TO TIZZERS. It is HER business who stays and who goes; not all the resident’s of SL. Why oversensationalize it? It’s a private matter and should be dealt with accordingly.
Anyway, I know first hand all the aspects of the culture of /b/. The vast majority of /b/tards are regular people with some extra time on their hands. Don’t tag the actions of the few on to the majority. If a random black person beat you up on the street, would you proclaim that all black people are criminals?
Prokofy Neva
Apr 24th, 2007
Carigorp,
Readers are welcome to go to these griefer sites and make up their own minds. After all, I let readers make up their own minds, unlike griefers, who impose their will, and a version of the truth on their unwilling victims.
I don’t buy the Leninist line that these griefers’ groups have components that “aren’t about griefing”. They are all devoted to violent, nihilist, reductive ideologies that in fact make an entire atmosphere of griefing by recruitment, training, and support. I don’t care if most of them don’t pull the trigger. They are all indicted as being part of a conspiracy to impose will on others by force.
Tizzers is in on it, too. She praises 4chan as if she was unaware — or lying about — its role in spawning and perpetrating the worst griefing in SL. She’s *hardly* the person you put in charge of making decisions about who is and isn’t a griefer. She’s simply not trustworthy, either by ignorance or by malicious intent. You don’t take a gaggle of the world’s known griefers and put them in a thing called “security” and praise them for rebuilding — something their alts destroyed while giggling at everybody.
I simply won’t bite on calls to provide “proof” about “Plastic Duck”. Plastic Duck is everywhere and nowhere, and not relevant to this discussion. Any alt or concept like that is.
Woodbury University needs investigation by the property authorities within that university, and if they’ve been turned, then one would have to go higher.
cickmy lunt
Apr 24th, 2007
put the thesaurus away, prokofy. way to misuse “countenance”
also, it’s even more painfully obvious that you don’t know what 4chan and SA are really about. 4chan has a board dedicated to pictures of cats for fucksake! they must be super griefers! and there’s a forum on SA dedicated to animal care, certainly they use their knowledge to commit acts of internet terrorism on the IAMS corporation :rolleyes:
of course, you’ll just use the same tired argument that since they’re not up each other’s asses worrying about what other people do with their free time, they must be condoning DA GREEF!!1one
whatever, i hang out with my baku buddies as well as pubbies, i must be one hell of a griefer to sit quietly playing slingo all day and spending all that money buying prim skirts and hair to make myself q-t
Anonymous
Apr 24th, 2007
Sorry to say this Prokofy, but you are a close minded fool. Anyone who would wrap an entire subgroup up into one little ball and label them all the same deserves that title. I have seen the /b/ culture first hand. The majority of them are not, as I said before, griefers. Also, the majority of them do not condone griefing. I AM a /b/tard and I am an officer of one of the most effective anti griefing groups in Second Life. Just because not all /b/tards are out there trying to stop PN does not mean that they condone their actions.
Carigorp Matzerath
Apr 24th, 2007
Oops, forgot the name there.