The Alphaville Herald

30 Responses to “W-HAT Goons Protest Supports Babyfur Rights in Second Life”

1. 

   Tertullian Blatherskate, Esq., of Blatherskate, Snopes, Gantry, and Blatherskate
   

   Apr 17th, 2009
   

   Damn you all to hell. Miss Petunia Amaryllis Courtney Taliaferro, tireless crusader for cleanliness and the eradication of vice in SL, was rushed in the wee-wee hours this morning to the emergency room of St. Lazarus of Many Sores.

   The vapors that overcame her after reading this noxious spewing about diaper-fetishes and sculpted nether-parts overcame her delicate nature.

   You shall hear in court us, if the poor woman does not recover promptly.

   Flowers may be sent to Miss Petunia, but only in blue and white colors. I’m guessing, from her monograph “True Gardens of the Upper Classes,” that other colors would be an effrontery to her delicate aesthetic sensibilities.
2. 

   Urizenus Sklar
   

   Apr 17th, 2009
   

   Troubling news Tertullian. I have sent her a flower cupcake and the latest issue of The Doily Monthly.
3. 

   Two Worlds
   

   Apr 17th, 2009
   

   Clearly W-hat supports free speech and the freedom of expression. Anyone claiming W-hat to be cyberterrorists, bigots, or trolls needs to re-evaluate their priorities. W-hat will join the whole of the metaverse in combating the omnipresent threat of censorship, and making Second Life a better place for sick f*cks who want to get their rocks off on the Internets.
4. 

   George Zimmer, Founder and CEO of Men's Warehouse
   

   Apr 17th, 2009
   

   You know, this would be much more of an ironic social commentary and troll if babyfurs didn’t actually hang out around w-hat.
5. 

   We
   

   Apr 17th, 2009
   

   Pix are you serious?
6. 

   We
   

   Apr 17th, 2009
   

   Uri don’t go getting all high and mighty on the “censorship” kick and support for
   freedom of speech line of BS, you f*ckers censor the sh!t out of this site dipsh!t.

   Are you on meds or some sh!t?

   The educational system must want to squeeze you out and pinch you off like the turdroll you are misf!t!

   Ex-lax much dumba$$?
7. 

   Emperor Norton Hears a Who?
   

   Apr 17th, 2009
   

   I think W-Hat dorked themselves to death on this one by even knowing what a “babyfur” is. That requires way too much knowledge of an obscure fetish of an obscure fetish.

   And Christ had a scat fetish sign is just a plane clueless cheep shot. It was Peter who had the scat fetish, as he relates in his letter to Philmon;

   Philmon 1:20 Yea, brother, let me have joy of thee in the Lord: refresh my bowels in the Lord.

   And that is from the Bible.

   Until they get a clue about their target the only laughs will be at their own expense.
8. 

   Zac
   

   Apr 17th, 2009
   

   There’s probably a lot of things you can make fun of w-hat for, but babyfurs aren’t one of them.
9. 

   Silawx
   

   Apr 17th, 2009
   

   Quote:
   You know, this would be much more of an ironic social commentary and troll if babyfurs didn’t actually hang out around w-hat.

   Like your mom?
10. 

    Blues
    

    Apr 17th, 2009
    

    Today’s e-article, Pixeleen can’t tell grief from serious behavior.

    Also Two Worlds your a faggot.
11. 

    mootykips
    

    Apr 17th, 2009
    

    w-hat aren’t perfect but at least they exhibit creative humor above dumping boxes everywhere so don’t throw stones in glass houses maybe? if furries manage to be better at griefing than you then there’s not much hope
12. 

    Eva Ryan
    

    Apr 17th, 2009
    

    /me shoves a soiled dainty doily up Tertullian Blatherskate, Esq., of Blatherskate, Snopes, Gantry, and Blatherskate’s ass.
13. 

    Two Worlds
    

    Apr 17th, 2009
    

    George Zimmer, you better have some evidence as large and overwhelming as your massive, mastadonic man-yogurt thrower.
14. 

    Two Worlds
    

    Apr 17th, 2009
    

    Hey, if it isn’t W-hat wannabe extraordinaire Blues Stilman, come to sh*t up the SLH just like he sh*ts up W-hat everytime he logs in (which is normally 12 hours straight, probably because he is unemployed).

    Hey, anyone want an easy target to grief the f*ck out of, send a CARE package to Blues Stilman, c/o real W-hats everywhere.
15. 

    holy shit
    

    Apr 18th, 2009
    

    Damn We, you sound pretty enraged. There a story behind all that anger or are you just lashing out irrationally? And please don’t tell me you’re pissed because you’re a babyfur because if you do I swear I’ll piss myself lolling.

    Article was great. It could have used more organization when it came to the chatlogs but I suppose they were necessary as they are to illustrate the hilarity.

    “You know, this would be much more of an ironic social commentary and troll if babyfurs didn’t actually hang out around w-hat.”

    The funny thing is that I can’t figure out whether or not to take them seriously. Are they really babyfurs or are they just trolling the PN and furries at the same time?
16. 

    Yikes
    

    Apr 18th, 2009
    

    HEY HEY! HO HO!! AGE VERIFICATION HAS GOT TO GO!
    HEY HEY! HO HO!! AGE VERIFICATION HAS GOT TO GO!
    HEY HEY! HO HO!! AGE VERIFICATION HAS GOT TO GO!
    HEY HEY! HO HO!! AGE VERIFICATION HAS GOT TO GO!
    HEY HEY! HO HO!! AGE VERIFICATION HAS GOT TO GO!
    HEY HEY! HO HO!! AGE VERIFICATION HAS GOT TO GO!
    HEY HEY! HO HO!! AGE VERIFICATION HAS GOT TO GO!
    HEY HEY! HO HO!! AGE VERIFICATION HAS GOT TO GO!
    HEY HEY! HO HO!! AGE VERIFICATION HAS GOT TO GO!
    HEY HEY! HO HO!! AGE VERIFICATION HAS GOT TO GO!
    HEY HEY! HO HO!! AGE VERIFICATION HAS GOT TO GO!
    HEY HEY! HO HO!! AGE VERIFICATION HAS GOT TO GO!
    HEY HEY! HO HO!! AGE VERIFICATION HAS GOT TO GO!
    HEY HEY! HO HO!! AGE VERIFICATION HAS GOT TO GO!
    HEY HEY! HO HO!! AGE VERIFICATION HAS GOT TO GO!
    HEY HEY! HO HO!! AGE VERIFICATION HAS GOT TO GO!
    HEY HEY! HO HO!! AGE VERIFICATION HAS GOT TO GO!

    (what are we protesting again?)
17. 

    Yikes
    

    Apr 18th, 2009
    

    Also, Pix I know you might be a bit retarded, but we weren’t pro-baby fur.
    HEY HEY! HO HO!! AGE VERIFICATION HAS GOT TO GO! <— Age Verification

    If you had read the description of the event it didn’t mention babyfurs.

    I mean, hay, if you’re going to pretend to be a reporter at least pretend to be a good one tia.
18. 

    Finnius
    

    Apr 18th, 2009
    

    To tell you the truth, I’m a little pissed off at this article. Okay, a lot. I mean really, first you misunderstand what were protesting. We were protesting (ironically, of course, but still) the advent of age verification rules, not those sick ass fucks who pretend to be children. I mean christ. Then, to put insult to injury, you don’t even get a good shot of ME. What the fuck’s up with that shit, yo? I was holding a sign OF MY OWN FACE! It was a big sign too. God, for a journalist, you’re not too good at picking the important people out of the crowd.
    
19. 

    Robble Rubble
    

    Apr 18th, 2009
    

    TWO WORLDS YOUR HEAD IS SHAPED LIKE A FOOTBALL, GO BACK TO TEACHING HIGH SCHOOL KIDS, NOT SWEARING AND BEING A PERPETUAL VIRGIN.

    HEY HEY! HO HO!! AGE VERIFICATION HAS GOT TO GO!

    WHY DON’T YOU COME BACK TO WHAT IN THE WEE HOURS OF THE MORNING TO WHINE ABOUT HOW GOONS WON’T ACCEPT YOU AND MAKE ANOTHER GOONPRIDE SPEECH.

    HEY HEY! HO HO!! AGE VERIFICATION HAS GOT TO GO!

    CALL YOURSELF OUT IN HELLDUMP AGAIN.

    HEY HEY! HO HO!! AGE VERIFICATION HAS GOT TO GO!
20. 

    Orion
    

    Apr 18th, 2009
    

    I’d comment here but after those threats from “Satan” in the other article I fear for my safety! – OOPS, another proponent of free speech squashed and oppressed by the machine!
21. 

    Silawx
    

    Apr 18th, 2009
    

    Oh no, it’s true. Most of us are HUGE furrys. For instance, my Fursona is a horseshoe crab. I mean, look at this:

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8e/Xiphosura.jpg

    How can you look at that smooth, curved shell and NOT be turned on? And it’s got ten legs. You know what that means?

    Really great hugs :3
22. 

    Rabid Barkley
    

    Apr 18th, 2009
    

    My innerfur is a giraffe and I scour the regions of furnation (the whole two I’m not banned from) looking for a baby moose to become my lover.
23. 

    Satan
    

    Apr 18th, 2009
    

    Orion, you shouldn’t feel concerned for your safety except maybe in the sense that your obsession is harmful to yourself and others. I don’t recall making any threats but I suppose really anything can be a ‘threat’. ie “I’m going to go outside for a cigarette” OMG I just threatened to do something!!

    You’re still missing the point that the debate had nothing to do with free speech at all but if you’d like to continue to debate it, how about you go back to THAT thread and do it there instead of in this one where it is irrelevant. I will gladly join you. Though convincing you of the truth is an act of futility since people tend to believe what they want to anyways, the act of making you look stupid to everyone else that is watching is both challenging and rewarding since it really requires me to explore the complexities of the human mind and articulate them (which interests me rather a lot).

    On another note, I hereby declare this article win (since obviously W-HAT is NOT in actuality supporting babyfurs)

    Also I agree with ‘holy shit’ in that it’s damn near impossible to tell if w-hat are serious furries or babyfurs as far as I see it.
24. 

    LOL
    

    Apr 18th, 2009
    

    Regardless of age verification and how old you are IRL, Age playing a “Baby Fur” with a diper fetish is just wrong on so many levels. The second life game is domminated by sex and the sex industry, only the pedophiles think it is “OK” to have chracters with child-like features.
25. 

    Robble Rubble
    

    Apr 19th, 2009
    

    So lol I have this bridge that I want to sell you.
26. 

    IMHO
    

    Apr 20th, 2009
    

    If you go around telling everyone you’re a kid, then you do deserve to be reported for being a kid.
27. 

    Neo Citizen
    

    Apr 27th, 2009
    

    Unbelievable.

    Simply stupifying.

    Read from the top of this document. Every single idiot who posted in the comments missed the primary point, even though you repeated it in comment after comment. It’s not about the baby furs – it’s about the age verification. W-Hat, nor any other griefer group (Woodbury University) would fail hard if age verification kicked back in as a standard. When Linden Lab pulled it in late 2006, it was one of their more witless moves. Bringing it back would stop 70% of the griefing in one shot. If you had to age verify every time you made a new griefing avatar, it would slow the march of the griefer alts to a trickle.

    Screw the baby furs, bring back age verification for EVERYBODY.

    Wait, the screw the baby furs, part, forget I said that part. That’s disgusting. But you get the idea.
28. 

    Stahi Columbia
    

    May 13th, 2009
    

    Awww, my tail was off.
29. 

    H. Trevino
    

    Aug 20th, 2010
    

    They seriously need phsycological help
30. 

    Yep
    

    Aug 20th, 2010
    

    “They seriously need phsycological help”

    And lot of it.

Leave a Reply